基于层次分析法的水土保持牧草筛选评价

王俊宏; 韩海东; 王成己; 郑向丽; 徐国忠; 黄毅斌

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.04.015

基于层次分析法的水土保持牧草筛选评价

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.04.015

福建省农业科学院农业生态研究所/福建省山地草业工程技术研究中心/福建省丘陵地区循环农业工程技术研究中心, 福建福州 350013

基金项目:

福建省自然科学基金项目 2016J01127

福建省科技计划项目——省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项 2015R1017-5

福建省农业科学院科技创新项目 2015CX-2

详细信息

作者简介:
王俊宏(1983-), 男, 硕士, 助理研究员, 研究方向:牧草育种与农业生态(E-mail:wang_110@126.com)

通讯作者:
徐国忠(1965-), 男, 研究员, 主要从事牧草育种研究(E-mail:xuguozhong178@126.com)

黄毅斌(1964-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事农业生态研究(E-mail:ecohyb@163.com)

中图分类号: S157.43
计量
- 文章访问数: 1447
- HTML全文浏览量: 169
- PDF下载量: 22
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2017-03-07
- 修回日期: 2018-08-18
- 刊出日期: 2019-04-28

Grasses for Soil and Water Conservation Selected by Analytic Hierarchy Process

Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Engineering and Technology Research Center for Hilly Prataculture/Fujian Engineering and Technology Research for Recycling Agriculture, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的筛选适宜福建省种植的水土保持型牧草，为福建省水土流失区域治理的草种选择提供参考。方法在水土流失严重的长汀地区选取11个草种，通过测定出苗率、成活率、覆盖度、枯落物浸水容量、根系重等水土保持特性指标，运用层次分析法和模糊数学法对试验品种进行综合评价，筛选福建省水土保持适宜牧草。结果试验区内表现优或较优的草种有百喜草、闽引圆叶决明、闽草1号狼尾草、闽牧6号狼尾草、大翼豆、葛藤；表现良好的有红象草、钝叶决明、扁豆、含羞草；表现较差的有福引圆叶决明1号。结论禾本科属的百喜草、闽草1号狼尾草、闽牧6号狼尾草，豆科属的闽引圆叶决明、大翼豆、葛藤较为适合福建长汀及周边相同气候条件的水土流失地区种植。
- 水土保持 /
- 草种 /
- 筛选 /
- 评价
Abstract: Objective Varieties of grass were evaluated for soil and water conservation in Fujian area. Method In Changting, the area where soil erosion and water conservation have become a serious concern, 11 varieties of grass for forage were screened according to their characteristics on the rates of germination, survival, coverage, and litter water-holding capacity as well as the weight of root mass. Analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics method were applied for the selection of best adaptable grass in the area. Result Paspalum notatum Flugge, Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Minyin, Pennisetum americanum×P.purpureum Mincao 1, Penniseturn americanum×P.purpureum cv. Minmu 6, Pueraria lobata, and Macroptilium atropurpureum, were considered superior or desirable varieties. Pennisetun purpureum cv. red, Cassia obtusifolia, Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet, Mimosa pudica exhibited good performance, whereas, Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Fuyin 1 did not perform well. Conclusion The gramineous grass, Paspalum notatum Flugge, Pennisetum americanum×P.purpureum Mincao 1, Penniseturn americanum×P.purpureum cv. Minmu 6, and leguminous grass, Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Minyin, Pueraria lobate, Macroptilium atropurpureum, appeared to be suitable for cultivation in the areas around Changting.
- water and soil conservation /
- grass /
- screening /
- evaluation

HTML全文

表 1 参试草品种

Table 1. Grass varieties tested

草品种 Forage variety	拉丁学名 Latin name
闽草1号狼尾草	Pennisetum americanum× P.purpureum Mincao 1
红象草	Pennisetun purpureum cv. red
闽牧6号狼尾草	Penniseturn americanum×P.purpureum cv. Minmu 6
百喜草	Paspalum notatum
闽引圆叶决明	Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Minyin
钝叶决明	Cassia obtusifolia
扁豆	Lablab purpureus
福引圆叶决明1号	Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Fuyin 1
大翼豆	Macroptilium atropurpureum
葛藤	Pueraria lobata
含羞草	Mimosa pudica

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 参试草品种观测结果

Table 2. Observations on 11 grass varieties

品种 Forage variety	评价指标Evaluation indices
品种 Forage variety	C₁/%	C₂/%	C₃/cm	C₄/%	C₅/(t·hm^-2)	C₆/(t·hm^-2)	C₇/(t·hm^-2)
闽草1号狼尾草Pennisetum americanum× P.purpureum Mincao 1	90	98	368	93	12.8	6.61	177.87
红象草Pennisetun purpureum cv. red	87	96	368	92	17.8	6.23	147.11
闽牧6号狼尾草Penniseturn americanum×P.purpureum cv. Minmu 6	84	97	350	89	16.1	10.66	146.85
福引圆叶决明1号Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Fuyin 1	74	92	107	75	13.8	1.62	9.04
百喜草Paspalum notatum	78	90	40	86	0.0	6.42	6.20
闽引圆叶决明Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Minyin	82	89	98	86	12.5	1.60	14.80
钝叶决明Cassia obtusifolia	91	93	210	85	15.2	1.24	15.85
扁豆Lablab purpureus	96	80	364	91	20.8	3.47	17.93
大翼豆Macroptilium atropurpureum	83	85	347	93	35.4	2.03	24.73
葛藤Pueraria lobata	86	83	263	97	22.8	1.34	25.28
含羞草Mimosa pudica	88	84	315	98	13.3	3.73	33.57

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 各类评价内容的分级界值

Table 3. Thresholds of evaluation criteria

指标 Cj	分级界限值Critical values					d值 d value	最大差值 Maximum difference
指标 Cj	优Best	较优Better	良Medium	较差Worse	差Worst	d值 d value	最大差值 Maximum difference
C1/%	96.00	90.50	85.00	79.50	74.00	5.50	22.00
C2/%	98.00	93.50	89.00	84.50	80.00	4.50	18.00
C3/cm	368.00	286.00	204.00	122.00	40.00	82.00	328.00
C4/%	98.00	92.25	86.50	80.75	75.00	5.75	23.00
C5/(t·hm^-2)	35.40	26.55	17.70	8.85	0.00	8.85	35.40
C6/(t·hm^-2)	10.66	8.30	5.94	3.58	1.22	2.36	9.42
C7/(t·hm^-2)	177.87	134.95	92.03	49.11	6.20	42.92	172.00

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 层次单排序及层次总排序

Table 4. Single-level and total sequencing of hierarchy

C层 C level	B1	B2	B3	B4	层次C总排序 C Sort
C层 C level	0.1772	0.099	0.4753	0.2485	层次C总排序 C Sort
C1	0.5994				0.1062
C2	0.4006				0.0710
C3		1			0.0990
C4			0.637		0.3028
C5			0.1047		0.0498
C6			0.2583		0.1228
C7				1	0.2485

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 参试草品种适宜性评价结果

Table 5. Adaptability of 11 grass varieties

品种 Forage variety	优 Best	较优Better	良 Medium	较差 Worse	差 Worst	评语 Total
百喜草Paspalum notatum	0.4431	0.0405	0.3429	0.0838	0.0897	优
闽引圆叶决明Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Minyin	0.4296	0.3079	0.1032	0.0252	0.1341	优
闽草1号狼尾草Pennisetum americanum× P.purpureum Mincao 1	0.3732	0.4792	0.1200	0.0276	0.0023	较优
闽牧6号狼尾草Penniseturn americanum×P.purpureum cv. Minmu 6	0.3236	0.4234	0.1287	0.0271	0.0976	较优
大翼豆Macroptilium atropurpureum	0.1839	0.2676	0.0755	0.2509	0.2229	较优
葛藤Pueraria lobata	0.1658	0.2473	0.1867	0.2043	0.1959	较优
红象草Pennisetun purpureum cv. red	0.1156	0.2547	0.4281	0.1781	0.0235	良
钝叶决明Cassia obtusifolia	0.0097	0.1666	0.3718	0.1375	0.3154	良
含羞草Mimosa pudica	0.3106	0.1781	0.3615	0.0770	0.0979	良
扁豆Lablab purpureus	0.2001	0.0791	0.2785	0.1848	0.2583	良
福引圆叶决明1号Chamaecrista rotundifolia cv. Fuyin 1	0.0003	0.0473	0.0515	0.7625	0.1399	较差

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(37)

[1]	高光耀, 傅伯杰, 吕一河, 等.干旱半干旱区坡面覆被格局的水土流失效应研究进展[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(1):12-22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201301002 GAO G Y, FU B J, LV Y H, et al. The effect of land cover pattern on hillslope soil and water loss in the arid and semi-arid region: a review[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(1):12-22.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201301002
[2]	刘晓燕, 杨胜天, 王富贵, 等.黄土高原现状梯田和林草植被的减沙作用分析[J].水利学报, 2014(11): 1293-1300. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slxb201411004 LIU X Y, YANG S T, WANG F G, et al. Analysis on sediment yield reduced by current terrace and shrubs-herbs-arbor vegetation in the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2014(11): 1293-1300.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slxb201411004
[3]	戴清霞.基于GIS和遥感的长汀县水土流失动态监测[D].福州: 福建农林大学, 2006. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y949334 DAI Q X. Water and soil loss dynamic monitoring of Changting County based on GIS and remote sensing[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2006.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y949334
[4]	曾从盛.福建典型区生态环境研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2006. ZENG C S. Typical Area Ecological Environment Research of Fujian[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2006.(in Chinese)
[5]	王琦.基于GIS与遥感的藉河示范区水土保持效益评价研究[D].杨凌: 中国科学院, 2010. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-80129-2010210212.htm WANG Q. On the benefit evaluation of region-scale soil and water conservation in Jihe Demonstration Zone based on GIS and Remote Sensing[D]. Yangling: University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010.(in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-80129-2010210212.htm
[6]	唐克丽.中国水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社, 2004. TANG K L. Soil and Water Conservation in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2004.(in Chinese)
[7]	CUI F, LI J, DING A, et al.Conditional QTL mapping for plant height with respect to the length of the spike and internode in two mapping populations of wheat[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2011, 122(8): 1517-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1551-6
[8]	MIKELSAAR A V, SVNTER A, MIKELSAAR R, et al. Epitope of titin A-band-specific monoclonal antibody Tit1 5 H1.1 is highly conserved in several Fn3 domains of the titin molecule. Centriole staining in human, mouse and zebrafish cells[J]. Cell Division, 2012, 7(1): 21. doi: 10.1186/1747-1028-7-21
[9]	孟广涛, 方向京, 李贵祥, 等.干热河谷不同引进草种水土保持效果比较[J].水土保持学报, 2008, 22(5): 65-67, 114. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2008.05.015 MENG G T, FANG X J, LI G X, et al. Effects of Different Introduced Grasses on Soil and Water Conservation in Dry-Hot Valley[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 22(5): 65-67, 114.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2008.05.015
[10]	孙发政.遵循水土生态规律发展草业和建设山水城市[J].南昌工程学院学报, 2014, 33(4): 85-87, 100. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4869.2014.04.019 SUN F Z. A study on forage industry development and landscape city construction based on ecological conservation[J]. Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology, 2014, 33(4): 85-87, 100.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4869.2014.04.019
[11]	钟荣华, 贺秀斌, 鲍玉海, 等.狗牙根和牛鞭草的消浪减蚀作用[J].农业工程学报, 2015, 31(2): 133-140. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.02.019 ZHONG R H, HE X B, BAO Y H, et al. Role of Cynodon dactylon L. and Hemarthria altissima in wave attenuation and erosion control[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(2): 133-140.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.02.019
[12]	许岳飞, 毕玉芬, 金晶炜.灌草复合型草地水土保持功能与经济效益分析[J].水土保持学报, 2007, 21(6): 56-59, 74. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.06.013 XU Y F, BI Y F, JIN J W. Analysis of Soil and Water Conservation Function and Economic Benefit of Composite Shrub-Grasslands[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 21(6): 56-59, 74.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1009-2242.2007.06.013
[13]	张成梁, 程冬兵, 刘士余.红壤坡地果园植草的水土保持效应[J].草地学报, 2006, 14(4): 365-369. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb200604014 ZHANG C L, CHENG D B, LIU S Y. Effects of Soil-and-Water Conservation by Planting Herbals on the Sloping Red Soil Land of an Orchard[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2006, 14(4): 365-369.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb200604014
[14]	邓辉, 何政伟, 陈晔, 等.基于GIS和RUSLE模型的山地环境水土流失空间特征定量分析——以四川泸定县为例[J].地球与环境, 2013, 41(6): 669-679. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzdqhx201306011 DENG H, HE Z W, CHEN Y, et al. The Spatial Features of Soil Erosion in Mountain Environment Based on GIS and RUSLE——A Case Study in Sichuan Luding[J]. Earth and Environment, 2013, 41(6): 669-679.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzdqhx201306011
[15]	左长清, 马良.几个草种的水土保持效应研究[J].江西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 26(4): 619-623. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxnydxxb200404031 ZUO C Q, MA L. A Study on Soil and Water Conservation Effects of Different Grass Coverings[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis(Natural Sciences Edition), 2004, 26(4): 619-623.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jxnydxxb200404031
[16]	周玉锋, 杨茂发, 文克俭, 等.水土保持型牧草苇状羊茅(Festuca arundinacea Schreb)节肢动物群落结构[J].生态学报, 2009, 29(1):515-522. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.01.061 ZHOU Y F, YANG M F, WEN K J, et al. Arthopod community structure of soil and water conservation-type tall fescue[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(1):515-522.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.01.061
[17]	蒋荣, 张兴奇, 张科利, 等.喀斯特地区不同林草植被的减流减沙作用[J].水土保持通报, 2013, 33(1): 18-22. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stbctb201301004 JIANG R, ZHANG X Q, ZHANG K L, et al. Runoff and Sediment Reduction Effects Under Different Forest and Grass Vegetation in a Karst Area[J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 33(1): 18-22.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stbctb201301004
[18]	罗海维, 徐建明.林草措施在石头河水库水土保持中的应用[J].广西水利水电, 2014(1): 60-62, 65. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1510.2014.01.016 LUO H W, XU J M. Application of forest and grass measures in water and soil conservation of Shitouhe Reservoir[J]. GuangXi Water Resources & Hydropower Engineering, 2014(1): 60-62, 65.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1510.2014.01.016
[19]	唐成斌, 龙绍云.灰色关联系统理论在牧草上的应用初探[J].草业科学, 1991, 8 (6): 44-47. TANG C B, LONG S Y. An application of the grey system theory in the introduction and evaluation of forages[J]. Pratacultural Science, 1991, 8 (6): 44-47.(in Chinese)
[20]	李志强.苜蓿干草营养价值评定方法研究进展[J].饲料广角, 2002 (11): 2124. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slgj200211001 LI Z Q. Alfalfa hay nutrient value assessment method is reviewed[J]. Feed China, 2002 (11): 2124.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/slgj200211001
[21]	韩路, 贾志宽, 韩清芳, 等.苜蓿种质资源特性的灰色关联度分析与评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 31 (3): 59-64. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2003.03.014 HAN L, JIA Z K, HAN Q F, et al. Relational grade analysis of grey theory and evaluation of characteristics of alfalafa germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition), 2003, 31 (3): 59-64.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2003.03.014
[22]	王国庆, 聂莹莹, 彭芳华, 等.AHP在牧草价值综合评定中的应用[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(15):132-135. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hljxmsy201608037 WANG G Q, NIE Y Y, PENG F H, et al. The application of AHP in the forage value comprehensively evaluating[J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016(15):132-135.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hljxmsy201608037
[23]	严慧玲, 刘东明, 李作恒, 等.层次分析法在河北省太行山区植被恢复植物种类筛选中的运用[J].植物研究, 2015, 35(5):751-758. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwyj201505019 YAN H L, LIU D M, LI Z H, et al. Analytic Hierarchy Process in Plant Species Selection of Revegetation in the Taihang Mountains in Hebei Province[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2015, 35(5):751-758.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zwyj201505019
[24]	梁力, 季贵斌, 赵颖.高速公路边坡暖季型草本植物生态适应性评价[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 39(1):128-132. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dbdxxb201801026 LIANG L, JI G B, ZHAO Y. Ecological Adaptability Evaluation of Warm-Season Herb Plants of Highway Slope[J]. Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science Edition), 2018, 39(1):128-132.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dbdxxb201801026
[25]	李鹏.几种引进牧草的水土保持效应研究[D].杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2008. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10712-2008101631.htm LI P. Study on soil and water conservation benefits of several us introduced grasses[D]. Yangling: Northwest A&F University, 2008.(in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10712-2008101631.htm
[26]	张雷, 洪光宇, 李卓凡, 等.基于层次分析法的毛乌素沙地3种造林模式恢复成效评价[J].林业资源管理, 2017(6):108-112, 119. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyzygl201706019 ZHANG L, HONG G Y, LI Z F, et al. Assessment of Three Kinds of Reforestation Models Recovery Effect in Mu Us Sandy Land Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process[J]. Forest Resources Management, 2017(6):108-112, 119.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lyzygl201706019
[27]	贾纳提, 刘梦, 梁维维, 等.旱作条件下新疆天山北坡中山带人工草地建植效果评价[J].草地学报, 2016, 24(5):1126-1130. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb201605030 JIA N T, LIU M, LIANG W W. Evaluation of planting effect of artificial grassland cultivated in the middle zone of northern slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5):1126-1130.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb201605030
[28]	刘宝贤, 申宏伟, 徐峰, 等.鲁东南滨海地区观赏草的观赏适应性评价[J].草业科学, 2014, 31(12):2221-2229. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0046 LIU B X, SHEN H W, XU F, et al. Ornamental-adaptability evaluation of ornamental grasses in Southeastern coastal region of Shandong[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(12):2221-2229.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2014-0046
[29]	岳辉.南方红壤侵蚀荒坡地种植Ⅱ系狼尾草栽培技术[J].水土保持应用技术, 2007(5):45-47. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5366.2007.05.018 YUE H. The southern red soil erosion slope planting pennisetum Ⅱ department of cultivation techniques[J]. Technology of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007(5):45-47.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5366.2007.05.018
[30]	韩立立, 谢锦升, 曾宏达, 等.百喜草治理对退化红壤生态系统碳库及分配的影响[J].亚热带资源与环境学报, 2013, 8(1):33-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2013.01.007 HAN L L, XIE J S, ZENG H D, et al. Effects of Pasplum notatum Flügge on Carbon Storage Change and Allocation in an Ecosystem Developed on Degraded Red Soil[J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2013, 8(1):33-40.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7105.2013.01.007
[31]	叶超, 郭忠录, 蔡崇法, 等. 5种草本植物根系理化特性及其相关性[J].草业科学, 2017, 34(3):598-606. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201703019 YE C, GUO Z L, CAI C F, et al. Relationship between root tensile mechanical properties and main chemical components of five herbaceous species[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(3):598-606.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201703019
[32]	应朝阳, 罗旭辉, 黄毅斌, 等.闽引圆叶决明适应性研究[J].草地学报, 2010, 18(1):137-140. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb201001026 YING Z Y, LUO X H, HUANG Y B, et al. Study on Adaptability of Chamaecrista rotundi folia Greene. cv. Minyin[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(1):137-140.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/cdxb201001026
[33]	苗晓靖, 陈赫男, 马睿, 等.几种灌藤植被根系分布与固持土壤效果评价[J].中国水土保持, 2015(2):50-51, 55. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgstbc201502019 MIAO X J, CHEN H N, MA R, et al. Several kinds of irrigation rattan vegetation root system distribution and retaining soil effect assessment[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2015(2):50-51, 55.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgstbc201502019
[34]	校亮, 熊东红, 张宝军, 等.葛藤覆被下干热河谷冲沟沟岸土壤水热变化特征[J].生态学报, 2018, 38(2):646-656. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201802029 XIAO L, XIONG D H, ZHANG B J, et al. Effect of Kudzu coverage on soil moisture and temperature in the gully bank of the Dry-hot Valley Region[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(2):646-656.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201802029
[35]	毕玉芬, 车伟光, 许岳飞.干热河谷区灌草草地的水土保持效应[J].热带作物学报, 2009, 30(8): 1176-1180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2009.08.024 BI Y F, CHE W G, XU Y F. Soil and Water Conservation Function of Composite Shrub Grasslands on the Hot Arid Valley in Yunnan Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2009, 30(8): 1176-1180.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2009.08.024
[36]	郭凯歌, 王向东, 殷小琳.国内水土保持生态效应评价的初步探讨[J].中国水土保持, 2017(4):8-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0941.2017.04.004 GUO K G, WANG X D, YIN X L. Domestic water and soil conservation ecological effect evaluation of the preliminary discussion[J]. Soil and Water Conservation in China, 2017(4):8-11.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0941.2017.04.004
[37]	蒲玉琳, 谢德体, 倪九派, 等.紫色土区坡耕地植物篱模式综合生态效益评价[J].中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(1):44-51. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201401007 PU Y L, XIE D T, NI J P, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive ecological benefits of different hedgerow patterns on slope-farmland in purple soil area[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(1):44-51.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stnyyj201401007