甘蔗花穗温水去雄技术研究

常海龙; 郭育强; 周峰; 方娜; 邱永生; 陈俊吕; 张伟; 秦元霞; 吴建涛; 张垂明; 刘壮; 王勤南

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.06.004

甘蔗花穗温水去雄技术研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.06.004

广州甘蔗糖业研究所海南甘蔗育种场/农业农村部广东甘蔗种质资源与利用科学观测实验站，海南　三亚　572025

基金项目: 广东省科学院建设国内一流研究机构行动专项资金项目（2020GDASYL-20200302005）；现代农业产业技术体系建设项目（CARS-170107）；国家自然科学基金项目（31701488）；广东省甘蔗剑麻产业技术体系创新团队专项（GARS-07-02）；广东省甘蔗种质资源库建设项目（2019B030316034）

详细信息

作者简介:
常海龙（1984−），男，农艺师，研究方向：甘蔗遗传育种（E-mail：hl2004@126.com）

通讯作者:
王勤南（1983−），男，副研究员，研究方向：甘蔗遗传育种（E-mail：wangqinnan66@163.com）

中图分类号: S 566.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 773
- HTML全文浏览量: 147
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-07-09
- 修回日期: 2020-05-02
- 刊出日期: 2020-08-10

Research on the Emasculation Technology by Hot Water about Sugarcane Tassels

Hainan Sugarcane Breeding Station of GSIRI/Ministry of Agriculture of Guangdong Sugarcane Germplasm Resources and Utilization of Scientific Observation Test Station, Sanya, Hainan　572025, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究不同温度、时间和品种对甘蔗花穗温水去雄效果的影响，探寻适宜的甘蔗杂交母本去雄方案，减少自交，提高甘蔗花穗杂交结实率。方法采用L₉（3⁴）正交表的设计方案进行三因素三水平的正交试验。以ROC22、科5和桂糖02-619等3个多花粉的甘蔗品种为试材，分别将其花穗在48、50 和52 ℃温水中浸泡3 、5 和7 min。每处理6株（每株1个花穗），其中：3株自交，3株异交（人工授予新鲜的外源花粉）。统计分析自交出苗数和异交出苗数。结果 ROC22、科5和桂糖02-619等3个品种均随水温增加、时间延长，其自交出苗数和异交出苗数都逐渐降低，假杂种比例呈现波动变化，50 ℃、3 min处理组合的假杂种比例最低（0.12）。方差分析结果表明，自交结实出苗数/异交结实出苗数（M值）可以作为温水去雄效果的评定标准，M值越高，去雄效果越好。温度和时间对M值均有显著影响，品种间差异不显著。结论甘蔗花穗去雄前先将小花穗枝条未展开和成熟（或即将成熟）的枝条剪去，置于 50 ℃温水中浸泡3 min后再进行杂交，可显著提高甘蔗有性杂交的育种效率。
- 甘蔗 /
- 花穗 /
- 正交试验 /
- 温水去雄 /
- 异交结实率
Abstract: Objective Orthogonal tests on temperature, time and varieties were conducted for the effects of emasculation technology by hot water in this study, which contributed to explore the suitable emasculation schemes of female parents, reduce self-fertilization ratio and improve the hybrid seed fertility of sugarcane tassels. Method The tassels of ROC22, Ke 5 and Guitang 02-619 with numerous pollen were treated at 48℃, 50℃ and 52℃ for 3 min, 5 min and 7 min according to the design scheme from L₉ (3⁴) orthogonal table. Among 6 tassels (one tassel per plant), 3 tassels were self-pollinated and the other 3 tassels were cross-pollinated (fresh exogenous pollen was granted artificially), the results of which were analyzed to calculate the emergence rate of self-pollinated and cross-pollinated hybrids. Result The emergence rate of ROC22, Ke 5 and Guitang 02-619 were gradually decreased with the increasing of temperature and time, and the ratio of pseudohybrids appeared to change with fluctuating. In addition, the pseudohybrids ratio was lowest (0.12) when cultivars were treated at 50℃ for 3 min. The variance analysis results showed that emergence number of self-pollinated seeds/emergence number of outcrossed seeds (M value) can be used to identify the effects of emasculation technology by hot water, the effect of emasculation technology by hot water was more significant when M value was higher. The temperature and time influenced on M value significantly, but different varieties had no difference. Conclusion The emasculation effect of sugarcane tassels being treated at 50℃ for 3min was better when the unspread branches and mature or being mature branches were removed before tassel emasculation, which significantly increased the seed setting percentage of hybridization.
- Sugarcane /
- tassels /
- Orthogonal tests /
- Emasculation technology by hot water /
- Outcrossing rate

HTML全文

表 1 正交试验各因素与水平设计

Table 1. The factors and levels in orthogonal tests

水平 Level	因素 Factors
水平 Level	温度 Temperature/℃	时间 Time/min	品种 Variety
1	48	3	ROC22
2	50	5	科5 Ke 5
3	52	7	桂糖02-619 Guitang02-619

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同处理甘蔗花穗的各项性能指标

Table 2. The performance index of sugarcane tassels in various treatments

试验组合 Test combination	因素 factors			自交出苗数 The number of selfing seed germination/株	异交出苗数 The number of outcrossing seed germination /株	假杂种比例 False hybrids ratio	M值 M value
试验组合 Test combination	A 温度 Temperature/℃	B 时间 Time/min	C 品种 Variety	自交出苗数 The number of selfing seed germination/株	异交出苗数 The number of outcrossing seed germination /株	假杂种比例 False hybrids ratio	M值 M value
A₁B₁C₁	48	3	ROC22	73.00	248.67	0.29	3.41
A₁B₂C₂	48	5	科5 Ke 5	56.00	167.33	0.33	2.99
A₁B₃C₃	48	7	桂糖02-619 Guitang 02-619	33.00	67.67	0.49	2.05
A₂B₁C₁	50	3	科5 Ke 5	21.00	173.33	0.12	8.25
A₂B₂C₂	50	5	桂糖02-619 Guitang 02-619	14.00	87.33	0.16	6.24
A₂B₃C₃	50	7	ROC22	4.00	18.00	0.22	4.50
A₃B₁C₁	52	3	桂糖02-619 Guitang 02-619	5.67	22.00	0.26	3.88
A₃B₂C₂	52	5	ROC22	2.67	5.67	0.47	2.13
A₃B₃C₃	52	7	科5 Ke 5	2.00	2.33	0.86	1.17

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同处理的方差分析结果

Table 3. Variance analysis in various treatments

项目 Project	因素 Factor	自由度 df	标准差 SD	F值 F-value	P值 P-value
自交出苗数 The number of selfing seed germination/株	温度 Temperature	2	2 163.953	23.317	0.041
	时间 Time	2	307.973	3.318	0.232
	品种 Variety	2	79.040	0.852	0.540
	误差 Error	2	92.807
异交出苗数 The number of outcrossing seed germination/株	温度 Temperature	2	17 204.298	11.423	0.080
	时间 Time	2	10 564.905	7.015	0.125
	品种 Variety	2	2 312.990	1.536	0.394
	误差 Error	2	1 506.122
假杂种比例 false hybrids ratio	温度 Temperature	2	0.099	4.765	0.173
	时间 Time	2	0.070	3.369	0.229
	品种 Variety	2	0.015	0.729	0.579
	误差 Error	2	0.021
M值 M value	温度 Temperature	2	14.010	62.760	0.016
	时间 Time	2	5.104	22.865	0.042
	品种 Variety	2	0.567	2.541	0.282
	误差 Error	2	0.223
注：P＜0.05或P＜0.01表示差异达显著或极显著水平。 Note: Different datas represented extremely significant difference（P＜0.01）and significant difference（P＜0.05）

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同甘蔗品种花穗经50 ℃温水处理3 min后去雄效果比较

Table 4. Comparison of emasculation technology in different sugarcane tassels that were treated by 50 ℃ water for 3 min

品种 Variety	自交出苗数 the number of selfing seed germination/株	异交出苗数 the number of outcrossing seed germination/株	假杂种比例 false hybrids ratio	M值 M value
ROC22	18.67±10.02 a	222.00±43.21 a	0.09±0.05 a	13.92±5.94 a
科5 Ke 5	22.00±6.00 a	216.33±52.70 a	0.11±0.04 a	10.74±5.60 a
桂糖02-619 Guitang02-619	15.33±4.04 a	200.33±43.52 a	0.08±0.02 a	13.33±2.40 a
注：同列数值后的英文小写字母表示LSD检验0.05水准的差异显著性，无相同字母表示差异显著（P＜0.05）。 Note: Lowercase letters in the same column indicates the significance of difference in LSD tests, without same letters in the same column indicates significant difference（P＜0.05）.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	李奇伟.现代甘蔗改良技术[M].广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2000: 19–42.
[2]	刘少谋, 王勤南, 黄忠兴, 等. 崖城系列亲本在我国甘蔗育种中的利用效果 [J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2011(4):5−10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9695.2011.04.002 LIU S M, WANG Q N, HUANG Z X, et al. Utilization of sugarcane parents of Yacheng series in sugarcane breeding of China [J]. <italic>Sugarcane and Canesugar</italic>, 2011(4): 5−10.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9695.2011.04.002
[3]	刘少谋, 王勤南, 符成, 等. 甘蔗常用亲本及杂交组合家系评价 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(2):234−240. LIU S M, WANG Q N, FU C, et al. Family assessment of usual sugarcane parents and their cross combination [J]. <italic>Journal of Plant Genetic Resources</italic>, 2011, 12(2): 234−240.(in Chinese)
[4]	黄锦福, 邓海华. 甘蔗常用亲本始花期及其遗传研究 [J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2004(4):6−10, 18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9695.2004.04.002 HUANG J F, DENG H H. Initial flowering time and its heritability of the commonly-used sugarcane parents in Hainan sugarcane breeding station [J]. <italic>Sugarcane and Canesugar</italic>, 2004(4): 6−10, 18.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9695.2004.04.002
[5]	经艳芬, 边芯, 桃联安, 等. 云瑞10系列甘蔗亲本及其组合的杂交育种潜力分析 [J]. 南方农业学报, 2019, 50(1):16−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2019.01.03 JING Y F, BIAN X, TAO L A, et al. Breeding potential analysis of Yunrui 10 series sugarcane parents and their crossing combinations [J]. <italic>Journal of Southern Agriculture</italic>, 2019, 50(1): 16−24.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2019.01.03
[6]	常海龙, 刘壮, 许环映, 等. 甘蔗开花生物学特性及花粉活力研究 [J]. 热带农业科学, 2017, 37(4):7−12. CHANG H L, LIU Z, XU H Y, et al. Flowering phenology and pollen activity of sugarcane [J]. <italic>Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture</italic>, 2017, 37(4): 7−12.(in Chinese)
[7]	常海龙, 张垂明, 张伟, 等. 甘蔗花粉活力和柱头可授性日变化研究 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(4):14−18. CHANG H L, ZHANG C M, ZHANG W, et al. Study on diumal variation of sugarcane's pollen vitality and Stigma energy [J]. <italic>Guangdong Agricultural Sciences</italic>, 2017, 44(4): 14−18.(in Chinese)
[8]	吴建涛, 许环映, 张垂明, 等. 不同环境下甘蔗亲本开花情况及其遗传研究 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(9):1954−1957. WU J T, XU H Y, ZHANG C M, et al. Flowering and its heritability of sugarcane parents in different environments [J]. <italic>Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences</italic>, 2017, 30(9): 1954−1957.(in Chinese)
[9]	李奇伟, 陈西文. 近年来海南甘蔗育种场甘蔗开花诱导与新种质杂交利用研究 [J]. 甘蔗糖业, 2000(1):1−7. LI Q W, CHEN X W. Recent studies on flowering induction and utilization of new genetic resources in sugarcane at Hainan sugarcane breeding station [J]. <italic>Sugarcane and Canesugar</italic>, 2000(1): 1−7.(in Chinese)
[10]	赵桂琴. 温汤去雄在早熟禾杂交中的应用 [J]. 草业科学, 2000, 17(1):23−26, 88. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2000.01.007 ZHAO G Q. The application of emasculation with hot water in hybridization of Poa [J]. <italic>Pratacultural Science</italic>, 2000, 17(1): 23−26, 88.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2000.01.007
[11]	MACHADO JR G R, WALKER D I, BRESSIANI J A, et al. Emasculation of sugarcane tassels using hot water [J]. <italic>Biology Breeding</italic>, 1996: 346−351.
[12]	MUKASA Y, SUZUKI T, HONDA Y. Emasculation of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum Gaertn) using hot water [J]. <italic>Euphytica</italic>, 2007, 156: 319−326. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9377-7
[13]	OTSUKA J, YAMAGUCHI S, CHIGIRA O, et al. Application of hot water emasculation to Acacia auriculiformis for controlled pollination [J]. <italic>Journal of Forest Research</italic>, 2010, 15: 210−216. doi: 10.1007/s10310-009-0174-0
[14]	耿雷跃, 张薇, 张启星. 粳稻不同杂交杀雄方法比较 [J]. 北方水稻, 2015, 45(5):19−21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6737.2015.05.005 GENG L Y, ZHANG W, ZHANG Q X. Comparing the Different Sterile Methods in Japonica Rice [J]. <italic>North Rice</italic>, 2015, 45(5): 19−21.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6737.2015.05.005
[15]	詹永发, 杨红, 姜虹, 等. 去雄授粉与花粉贮藏条件对朝天椒杂交结实率的影响 [J]. 种子, 2008, 27(11):17−21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2008.11.006 ZHAN Y F, YANG H, JIANG H, et al. Effect of pollen store and getting rid of powder on hot pepper hybrid rate of fruit [J]. <italic>Seed</italic>, 2008, 27(11): 17−21.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2008.11.006
[16]	何忠军, 李英, 薛艳, 等. 不同化学杀雄剂对甘蓝型油菜的杀雄效果研究 [J]. 种子, 2019, 38(5):153−156. HE Z J, LI Y, XUE Y, et al. Study on the effects of male sterilization of Brassica na pus L.Induced by different chemical hybridization agents [J]. <italic>Seed</italic>, 2019, 38(5): 153−156.(in Chinese)
[17]	赵彩霞, 刘自刚, 孙万仓, 等. 化学杀雄剂对白菜型冬油菜陇油6号的杀雄效果 [J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2013, 35(4):394−399. doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.04.007 ZHAO C X, LIU Z G, SUN W C, et al. Effect of chemical hybridizing agents on winter Brassica rapa cv Longyou 6 [J]. <italic>Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences</italic>, 2013, 35(4): 394−399.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2013.04.007
[18]	YU C Y, DONG J G, HU S W, et al. Efficiency of a novel gametocide amidosulfuron on rapeseed (Brassica napus) [J]. <italic>Plant Breeding</italic>, 2009, 128(5): 538−540. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2008.01594.x
[19]	YU C, HU S, HE P, et al. Inducing male sterility in Brassica napus L. by a sulphonylurea herbicide, tribenuron-methyl [J]. <italic>Plant Breeding</italic>, 2006, 125(1): 61−64. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2006.01180.x
[20]	ADUGNA A, NANDA G S, SINGH K, et al. A comparison of cytoplasmic and chemically-induced male sterility systems for hybrid seed production in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) [J]. <italic>Euphytica</italic>, 2004, 135(3): 297−304. doi: 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013320.28114.c6
[21]	周峰, 张垂明, 吉家乐, 等. 甘蔗母本温水去雄杂交后代的SSR标记鉴定 [J]. 西南农业报, 2016, 29(1):33−38. ZHOU F, ZHANG C M, JI (J)(L\|Y), et al. Identification of sugarcane hybrid progeny with female parent's tassel emasculated in hot water by SSR marker [J]. <italic>Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences</italic>, 2016, 29(1): 33−38.(in Chinese)
[22]	余波, 林添资, 景德道, 等. 水稻剪颖后温汤杀雄的可行性试验 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(9):66−68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2014.09.021 YU B, LIN T Z, JING D D, et al. A feasibility experiment on male was killed by warm soup after glume cutted in rice [J]. <italic>Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences</italic>, 2014, 42(9): 66−68.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2014.09.021
[23]	HUTCHCROFT C D. Contamination in seed fields of corn resulting from incomplete detasseling [J]. <italic>Agronomy Journal</italic>, 1959, 51(5): 267−271. doi: 10.2134/agronj1959.00021962005100050006x
[24]	CHINWUBA P M, GROGAN C O, ZUBER M S. Interaction of detasseling, sterility, and spacing on yields of maize hybrids 1 [J]. <italic>Crop Science</italic>, 1961, 1(4): 279−280. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1961.0011183X000100040015x
[25]	SANGOI L, SALVADOR R J. Effect of maize plant detasseling on grain yield tolerance to high plant density and drought stress [J]. <italic>Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</italic>, 1998, 33(5): 677−684.
[26]	钱前, 王钧, 王莉, 等. 黑果枸杞ISSR-PCR反应体系的正交设计优化 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(19):6398−6406. QIAN Q, WANG J, WANG L, et al. Optimization of ISSR-PCR reaction system in Lycium ruthenicum with orthogonal design [J]. <italic>Molecular Plant Breeding</italic>, 2018, 16(19): 6398−6406.(in Chinese)
[27]	肖琳, 曾艳玲, 刘卫东. 采用正交设计方法优化观赏桃ISSR-PCR反应体系 [J]. 经济林研究, 2017, 35(4):136−140. XIAO L, ZENG Y L, LIU W D. Optimization of ISSR-PCR reaction system of Prunus persica by orthogonal design [J]. <italic>Nonwood Forest Research</italic>, 2017, 35(4): 136−140.(in Chinese)
[28]	李北兴, 王伟昌, 张大侠, 等. 正交设计和均匀设计在优化噻虫胺悬浮剂物理稳定性上的应用 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(2):280−292. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.02.08 LI B X, WANG W C, ZHANG D X, et al. Application of orthogonal design and uniform design in physical stability promotion of clothianidin suspension concentrate [J]. <italic>Scientia Agricultura Sinica</italic>, 2015, 48(2): 280−292.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.02.08
[29]	张彬, 芮雯奕, 郑建初, 等. 水稻开花期花粉活力和结实率对高温的响应特征 [J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(7):1177−1181. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.07.020 ZHANG B, RUI W Y, ZHENG J C, et al. Responses of pollen activity and seed setting of rice to high temperature of heading period [J]. <italic>Acta Agronomica Sinica</italic>, 2007, 33(7): 1177−1181.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2007.07.020
[30]	WILKINSON J E, TWELL D, LINDSEY K. Activities of CaMV 35S and nos promoters in pollen: implications for field release of transgenic plants [J]. <italic>Journal of Experimental Botany</italic>, 1997, 48(2): 265−275. doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.2.265
[31]	杨交礼. 两种新型药物对油菜的杀雄效果及机制研究[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2006. YANG J L. Studies on Male Sterilizing Effect and Mechanism of Two New Chemicals in Rapeseed [D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2006.（in Chinese）