Selection of Carrier for Dried Bacillus natto
-
摘要: 为研制纳豆芽胞杆菌固体菌剂的制备工艺，以活菌数为指标，考察不同载体，配比，干燥温度等因素对固体菌剂有效活菌数的影响。结果表明：温度37℃，转速150 r·min-1，摇床上进行吸附60 min后，最优吸附载体为麦饭石，最适吸附比例为1：1，干燥温度40℃，初始有效活菌数达1.09×109 CFU·g-1，最适保藏温度25℃，保藏6个月后仍有2.9×108 CFU·g-1，活菌数残留率为20.2%。同时，麸皮、豆粕、玉米粉可为菌剂提供营养，有利于固体菌剂的长期保藏。Abstract: Preparation of a dried Bacillus natto product was studied. The carrier material, mixing ratio, and drying temperature for the making were evaluated according to the survival rate of B. natto in the dried product. The optimal process was determined to be stirring the bacterial solution with quartz monzonite as the adsorbent carrier in a mixing ratio of 1:1 at 150 r·min-1 and 37℃ for 60 min in a container prior to dehydration at 40℃. The dried product had a bacterial count of 1.09×109 CFU·g-1. After 6-month storage at 25℃, the count decreased by 20.2% to 2.9×108 CFU·g-1. Inclusion of wheat bran, soymeal and/or corn meal in the mix would provide nutrients for B. natto resulting in aprolonged shelf life of the dried product.
-
Key words:
- Bacillus natto /
- dried bacteria /
- carrier /
- quartz monzonite /
- adsorption
-
图 1 不同吸附比对有效活菌数的影响
注：图中不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P＜0.05)。图 2同。
Figure 1. Effect of bacteria/carrier ratio on viable bacteria count in dried product
图 2 不同干燥温度对有效活菌数的影响
Figure 2. Effect drying temperature on viable bacteria count in dried product
图 3 25℃保存条件下不同载体固化菌剂有效活菌数变化
Figure 3. Viable bacteria count in dried products of different carriers stored at 25℃
图 4 4℃保存条件下不同载体固化菌剂有效活菌数变化
Figure 4. Viable bacteria count in dried products of different carriers stored at 4℃
表 1 不同载体吸附效果比较
Table 1. Bacterial adsorptions on different carriers
麦饭石 活性炭 麸皮 玉米粉 豆粕 初始液体菌剂 有效活菌数/(108CFU·g-1) 10.9±0.436a 1.02±0.433a 8.44±0.087b 8.21±0.106b 7.94±0.599b 11.7 吸附率/% 93.2 87.2 72.1 70.2 67.9 含水量/% 9.11 9.03 9.44 9.61 9.74 注：数据后不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P＜0.05)。 
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张拢利, 刘青, 徐智, 等.复合微生物菌剂对污泥堆肥的作用效果研究[L].环境工程学报, 2008, 2(2):266-269. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwrzljsysb200802025 [2] 洪宇健, 孙恺辉, 林瑞敏, 等.微生物制剂在水产养殖中的应用[J].饲料与畜牧, 2016(11):49-49. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20162016120100069810 [3] 勾长龙, 高云航, 刘淑霞, 等.微生物菌剂对堆肥发酵影响的研究[J].湖北农业科学, 2013, 52(6):1244-1246. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2013.06.002 [4] 官赟赟, 顾锡慧, 雷太平, 等.炼油废水COD降解菌固态菌剂的制备及性能考察[J].工业水处理, 2016, ,36(2):75-78. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gyscl201602020 [5] 王微, 李圆萍, 谢惠玲, 等.铜绿假单胞菌菌剂载体的筛选[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 45(3):325-330. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjnydxxb201603015 [6] 赵旭, 王改兰, 陈春玉, 等.谷糠和堆肥作为微生物菌剂载体的研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(14):179-223. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2015.14.069 [7] 高书锋, 刘惠知, 胡新旭, 等.畜禽用凝结芽孢杆菌菌剂制备工艺的初步研究[J].饲料工业, 2012, 33(13):37-40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-991X.2012.13.009 [8] GUAN D, SUN C, SUN Y, et al. Cd2+-Adsorption Properties in Wastewater of Composite Modified Maifan Stone[J]. International Conference on Bioinformatics & biomedical engineering, 2010:1-4. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/icp.jsp?arnumber=5515547 [9] HONG S, ZHANG J, FENG C, et al. Enhancement of nitrate removal in synthetic groundwater using wheat rice stone[J].Water Science & Technology A Journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2012, 66(9):1900-1907. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=60f6248064aa756d25cf50d1da61d0e8 [10] 李慧, 王平, 肖明.硅藻土和滑石粉作为荧光假单胞菌P13菌剂的载体研究[J].中国生物防治, 2009, 25(3):239-244. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-9261.2009.03.011 [11] 王岩, 高建伟, 裴世春, 等.麦饭石对葡萄中农药残留的吸附效果[J].食品工业科技, 2017, 38(20):68-71. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spgykj201720013 [12] 常新强, 周明, 沈权.改性麦饭石去除应用水中的砷[J].净水技术, 2013, 32(3):19-22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-0177.2013.03.005 [13] 马梅荣, 陈雷, 宣世伟, 等.XM固态菌剂载体选择的初步研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2005, 37(2):259-262. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0367-6234.2005.02.033 [14] 张琪.枯草芽胞杆菌固定化载体的改性条件及处理模拟污水[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨理工大学, 2014. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y2509230 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1072
- HTML全文浏览量: 139
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
