不同光照条件及混播比例对冷季型草坪草混播质量的影响

赵春莉; 刘翰升; 周博涛; 赵子剑; 潘珠峰

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.01.009

不同光照条件及混播比例对冷季型草坪草混播质量的影响

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.01.009

1.
吉林农业大学园艺学院, 吉林长春 130118
2.
北京林业大学园林学院, 北京 100083

基金项目:

国家大学生科技创新基金项目 201610193057

详细信息

作者简介:
赵春莉(1973-), 女, 博士, 副教授, 硕士生导师, 研究方向:园林植物生物技术及资源等(E-mail:zcl8368@163.com)

中图分类号: S688.4
计量
- 文章访问数: 1168
- HTML全文浏览量: 169
- PDF下载量: 43
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2018-09-10
- 修回日期: 2018-10-15
- 刊出日期: 2019-01-28

Effect of Light Exposure and Cold-season Turfgrass Mixing on Performance of Lawn

1.
School of Horticulture, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin 130118, China
2.
School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究全光照及遮阴条件下，冷季型草坪草草地早熟禾（优美、肯塔基）、紫羊茅（梦神）和多年生黑麦草（轰炸机）与狗牙根混播的草坪质量，比较不同光照条件及混播比例的成坪效果差异，提出适合长春地区夏季混播的草种及组合。方法通过草坪草外观评价指标，运用隶属函数法及权重法进行综合评价，比较成坪效果差异。结果在遮阴条件下，多年生黑麦草轰炸机:草地早熟禾优美=1:2效果最好，质量评价分数为0.731；在全光照条件下，多年生黑麦草轰炸机:草地早熟禾肯塔基:普通狗牙根=3:4:3效果最好，质量评价分数为0.396，多年生黑麦草轰炸机与草地早熟禾优美、紫羊茅梦神混播不成坪。结论在遮阴条件下，两种草坪草混播组合优于含有保护种狗牙根的3个草坪草品种混播组合；在全光照条件下，含有保护种狗牙根的3个草坪草品种混播组合整体草坪质量优于两种草坪草混播组合。
- 草地早熟禾 /
- 紫羊茅 /
- 多年生黑麦草 /
- 冷季型草坪草 /
- 混播 /
- 草坪质量评价 /
- 草坪建植
Abstract: Objective Effects of full light exposure or shading condition and mixing ratio of the cool season meadow grass (Euromyth and K.B.G), Festuca rubra (Rubra), perennial ryegrass (Bomber) and Bermudagrass on the growth and appearance of the lawn were evaluated for turf building in the city of Changchun in northern China. Method Turf appearance indices on the treatment lawns were compared and evaluated using the membership function method and weights comprehensive evaluation method. Result In the shade, the mixing ratio of Bomber:Euromyth at 1:2 performed the best with an evaluation score of 0.731. Under full sunlight exposure, the Bomber:K.B.G:Common=3:4:3 combination had the highest score of 0.396, whereas mixing Bomber and Euromyth or Bomber and Rubra would not form an acceptable lawn. Conclusion The combination of two turfgrasses appeared superior on lawn performance to that of 3-turfgrass containing the protective Bermuda variety in a shaded lot. However, with full sunlight the later were better than the former.
- Poa pratensis /
- Festuca rubra /
- Lolium perenne /
- cold-season turfgrass /
- mixed sowing /
- turf quality evaluation /
- lawn establishment

HTML全文

表 1 播种比例及播种量

Table 1. Mixing ratios and quantities of seeds

处理 Treatment	轰炸机 Bomber	优美 Euromyth	梦神 Rubra	肯塔基 K.B.G	普通狗牙根 Common
A1(CK)	1(86.9)	2(128.6)
A2	1(58.3)	4(154.7)
A3	3(78.0)	7(135.3)
A4	2(104.1)	3(115.9)
B1(CK)	1(86.0)		2(125.8)
B2	1(52.2)		4(152.5)
B3	3(78.0)		7(133.4)
B4	2(104.1)		3(114.3)
C1(CK)	2(52.2)			5(135.3)	3(202.6)
C2	3(78.0)			4(108.3)	3(202.6)
C3	4(104.1)			3(81.2)	3(202.6)
C4	1(26.1)			6(102.4)	3(202.6)
注：表中括号内数字为播种量，单位为g·m^-2。 Note：The data in the parentheses was seeding ralte, g·m^-2.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 草坪质量评价指标权重

Table 2. Turf quality indices and weights for lawn evaluation

评价指标 Evaluation intex	成坪速度 Turf speed	密度 Density	生长速度 Growth rate	质地 Turf texture	颜色 Color	生物量 Biomass
权重Weight	0.05	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.1	0.1

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 不同冷季型草坪草混播比例组合下草坪坪用性状

Table 3. Performance of lawns with various combinations of cold-season turfgrass under differed light conditions

组合处理 Treatment	成坪速度 Turf speed /d	密度 Density /(株·cm^-2	生长速度 Growth rate /(cm·d^-1)	质地 Turf texture /cm	颜色 Color	生物量 Biomass /(g·m^-2)
全光照处理Full light conditions
A1	-	0.50±0.07ij	0.26±0.06hij	0.19±0.05cdefgh	2.64±0.47ab	320±70.00jk
A2	-	0.25±0.06lm	0.20±0.06j	0.15±0.04fgh	2.27±0.17b	160±35.121
A3	-	0.42±0.04ijk	0.32±0.09hij	0.24±0.05abc	2.58±0.24ab	350±73.71ijk
A4	-	0.58±0.08i	0.26±0.06hij	0.26±0.05ab	2.78±0.30ab	270±70.24kl
B1	-	0.33±0.05kl	0.22±0.04ij	0.24±0.04abc	2.64±0.43ab	640±75.50de
B2	-	0.16±0.03m	0.21±0.07ij	0.15±0.04fgh	2.94±0.61ab	350±61.10ijk
B3	-	0.50±0.05ij	0.27±0.04hij	0.20±0.06bcdefgh	3.09±0.70ab	450±149.33ghij
B4	-	0.41±0.10jk	0.39±0.03gh	0.29±0.05a	2.80±0.47ab	490±45.09fghi
C1	24	0.83±0.08gh	0.35±0.07ghij	0.22±0.05abcdef	2.58±0.63ab	830±47.26bc
C2	29	0.92±0.06fg	0.31±0.04hij	0.20±0.04bcdefgh	2.47±0.76ab	700±65.57cd
C3	31	0.75±0.11h	0.36±0.07ghi	0.26±0.05ab	2.47±0.68ab	620±106.93def
C4	35	0.57±0.05i	0.31±0.05hij	0.23±0.03abcd	2.44±0.60ab	340±45.09jk
遮阴处理Shade conditions
A1	23	1.83±0.07b	0.86±0.08bc	0.16±0.01defgh	2.76±0.50ab	1060±121.24a
A2	29	1.58±0.10c	0.77±0.11cd	0.21±0.03bcdefg	2.62±0.57ab	750±65.06bcd
A3	27	1.67±0.06c	0.77±0.20cd	0.17±0.01cdefgh	3.16±0.51ab	550±96.09efg
A4	35	2.00±0.12a	0.83±0.07bc	0.14±0.02gh	3.22±0.50ab	630±77.67de
B1	27	1.63±0.13c	0.97±0.09b	0.14±0.03h	2.93±0.24ab	630±50.33de
B2	33	1.13±0.14e	0.95±0.08b	0.17±0.02defgh	3.42±0.71ab	400±73.701hijk
B3	35	0.93±0.09fg	0.85±0.05bc	0.16±0.02efgh	3.58±0.68a	420±65.57ghij
B4	39	1.40±0.18d	1.16±0.07a	0.23±0.04abcde	3.20±0.53ab	520±95.39efgh
C1	25	0.89±0.05fgh	0.47±0.07fg	0.18±0.02cdefgh	2.91±0.84ab	840±70.95b
C2	21	1.25±0.08de	0.59±0.13ef	0.19±0.03bcdefgh	2.95±0.69ab	880±65.57b
C3	23	1.00±0.15f	0.66±0.06de	0.19±0.03bcdefgh	2.89±0.60ab	640±62.45de
C4	31	0.83±0.12gh	0.38±0.02gh	0.22±0.04abcde	3.24±1.21ab	450±65.06ghij
注：同列数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著(P＜0.05)，“-”观测期内未成坪。 Note: Different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05), and “-” is not flat during the observation period.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同光照处理和不同混播比例组合标准化值及草坪质量综合评价

Table 4. Normalized scores on evaluation indices and quality assessment on lawns built with various combinations of cold-season turfgrass under differed light conditions

组合处理 Treatment	成坪速度 Turf speed	密度 Density	生长速度 Growth speed	质地 Turf texture	颜色 Color	生物量 Biomass	综合评价得分 Comprehensive evaluation score	排序 Sort
全光照处理Full light condition
A1	0	0.187	0.103	0.620	0.457	0.190	0.292	1
A2	0	0.063	0.047	0.817	0.350	0.037	0.271	2
A3	0	0.150	0.157	0.350	0.437	0.217	0.230	3
A4	0	0.227	0.103	0.273	0.497	0.140	0.215	4
B1	0	0.103	0.063	0.353	0.460	0.497	0.226	3
B2	0	0.013	0.057	0.793	0.540	0.223	0.292	2
B3	0	0.190	0.110	0.550	0.587	0.317	0.303	1
B4	0	0.143	0.220	0.157	0.503	0.347	0.215	4
C1	0.58	0.353	0.183	0.473	0.437	0.680	0.393	2
C2	0.52	0.397	0.147	0.550	0.407	0.553	0.396	1
C3	0.48	0.313	0.193	0.270	0.403	0.480	0.307	3
C4	0.42	0.223	0.147	0.413	0.397	0.207	0.277	4
遮阴处理Shade condition
A1	0.62	0.853	0.653	0.740	0.490	0.893	0.731	1
A2	0.52	0.727	0.587	0.513	0.450	0.603	0.588	4
A3	0.55	0.767	0.570	0.680	0.603	0.413	0.633	3
A4	0.42	0.937	0.623	0.830	0.623	0.490	0.730	2
B1	0.55	0.770	0.753	0.863	0.540	0.490	0.727	1
B2	0.45	0.523	0.737	0.727	0.680	0.263	0.614	4
B3	0.42	0.393	0.643	0.773	0.723	0.287	0.574	2
B4	0.35	0.603	0.927	0.423	0.617	0.383	0.606	3
C1	0.58	0.380	0.293	0.633	0.533	0.690	0.478	3
C2	0.65	0.560	0.407	0.593	0.547	0.723	0.550	1
C3	0.62	0.433	0.467	0.610	0.527	0.497	0.511	2
C4	0.48	0.353	0.210	0.433	0.630	0.317	0.368	4

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(23)

[1]	孙吉雄.草坪学[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2008:359-361. SUN J X.Turfgrass Science[M]. The third edition.Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008: 359-361.(in Chinese)
[2]	韩烈保.草坪管理学[M].北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1994. HAN L B.Turfgrass Management[M]. Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1994.(in Chinese)
[3]	南志标.混播治理牧草病害的研究[J].草业科学, 1986, 3(5):40-45. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-CYKX198605009.htm NAN Z B.A sdudy of use mixture of different forage crop species for disease management[J]. Pratacultural Science, 1986, 3(5):40-45.(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-CYKX198605009.htm
[4]	南志标.草坪草病害综合防治的原则与要点[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 1999:193-202. NAN Z B.Principles and Key Points of Integrated Control of Turfgrass Diseases[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1999:193-202.(in Chinese)
[5]	李春杰, 南志标.混播对草坪建植与病害的影响[J].草业科学, 2002(8):63-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2002.08.020 LI C J, NAN Z B.The preliminary identification of several drought resistance warm-season turf grasses[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2002(8): 63-66.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2002.08.020
[6]	沈少君, 林文雄, 陈芳育, 等.草坪混播技术研究现状与展望[J].中国草地, 2002(4):47-52. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd200204009 SHEN S J, LIN W X, CHEN F Y, et al.Current Status and Prospect in Research on Technique of Turfgrass Mixtures[J]. Grassland of China, 2002(4):47-52.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd200204009
[7]	张磊, 郭月玲, 邵涛.我国草坪草混播的研究现状及展望[J].草原与草坪, 2008(1): 81-86. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2008.01.017 ZHANG L, GUO Y L, SHAO T.Current situation and foreground of researches on turf-grass mixture in China[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2008(1): 81-86.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2008.01.017
[8]	翟小娟.草地早熟禾与紫羊茅混播建坪及其群落种间竞争研究[D].呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2009. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10129-2009131570.htm ZHAI X J.Study on the establishment and inter-specificcompetition of the community of the mix-sowing turf of Kentucky Bluegrass and Red Fescue[D]. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2009.(in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10129-2009131570.htm
[9]	德力格尔, 李媛媛, 张淑娟.遮阴对成坪期草地早熟禾和紫羊茅生长特性的影响[J].草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 886-892. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201506005 GELIGEER, LI Y Y, ZHANG S J.Effects of shading on growth characteristics of Poa pratensis and Festuca rubra during turf mature stage[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 886-892.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201506005
[10]	孙吉雄.冷地型足球场草坪混播组合多年生黑麦草最佳含量的研究[J].草业学报, 1995(4): 66-70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.1995.04.002 SUN J X.The study on the optimum ratio of lolium perenne in mixed-seeding cool season sportfiled turf[J]. Pratacultural Science, 1995(4): 66-70.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.1995.04.002
[11]	李祖祥, 吕梅, 夏爱军.遮阴对冷季型草坪草叶绿素含量和生物量的影响[J].草原与草坪, 2017, 37(5):69-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.05.012 LI Z X, LV M, XIA A J.Effects of shading on chlorophyll content and biomassof cool season turfgrass[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2017, 37(5): 69-74.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2017.05.012
[12]	孙吉雄.草坪学[M].第4版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2015: 74-137. SUN J X.Turfgrass Science[M]. The fourth edition.Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015: 74-137.(in Chinese)
[13]	刘建秀.草坪坪用价值综合评价体系的探讨评价体系的建立[J].中国草地, 1988 (1): 44-47. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd199801012 LIU J X.Approach to the comprehensive assessment system of turf quality[J]. Grassland of China, 1988 (1): 44-47.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd199801012
[14]	朱明, 李建龙, 宋子健, 等.亚热带城市绿地草坪质量评价标准及其应用初探[J].中国草地, 2002, 24(5): 40-44. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd200205009 ZHU M, LI J L, SONG Z J, et al.Evaluation standard of greening lawn quality in subtropical cities and its application[J]. Grassland of China, 2002, 24(5): 40-44.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgcd200205009
[15]	罗富成, 彭健, 段新慧, 等.昆明地区几种混播草坪质量评价及组合优化[J].草原与草坪, 2013, 33(3):50-56. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2013.03.010 LUO F C, PENG J, DUAN X H, et al.Quality evaluation and optimization of mixture turf in Kunming[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2013, 33(3): 50-56.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2013.03.010
[16]	孙吉雄.冷地型草坪混播组合中草地早熟禾最佳含量的研究[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 1996(3): 37-41. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600127524 SUN J X.Study on the optimum percentage of Poa pratensis L.in mixed-seeding combination of turf[J]. Journal of Gansu Agriculture Univercity, 1996(3): 37-41.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600127524
[17]	白文祖, 刘照辉, 白小明, 等.3种冷季型草坪草混播初期适宜比例初探[J].草业科学, 2014, 31(8):1455-1460. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201408008 BAI W Z, LIU Z H, BAI X M, et al.Primary study of appropriate mixed sowing ratio of three cool season turfgrasses in initial growth stage[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(8): 1455-1460.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/caoyekx201408008
[18]	张晔, 陈功, 王军.昆明草坪草混播配方优化组合模式探讨[J].草业与畜牧, 2007(3):33-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8403.2007.03.010 ZHANG Y, CHEN G, WANG J.Research on the optimum combination pattern of turfgrass mixture in Kunming[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2007(3): 33-36.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8403.2007.03.010
[19]	张芸芸, 孙彦.冷季型草坪草的耐热性研究进展[J].北方园艺, 2008(8):57-60. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bfyany200808020 ZHANG Y Y, SUN Y.The thermotolerance research of cool-season turfgrasses[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2008(8):57-60.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bfyany200808020
[20]	李文烁.成都草坪草种混播组合试验[J].当代畜牧, 2013(11):18-19. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDXM201311013.htm LI W S.Research on the combination pattern of turfgrass mixture in Chengdu[J]. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2013(11):18-19.(in Chinese) http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DDXM201311013.htm
[21]	赵玉红, 张涪平.轻度遮荫对紫羊茅生长和叶绿素含量的影响[J].草原与草坪, 2009(6):24-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2009.06.006 ZHAO Y H, ZHANG F P.Effect of lightly shading on chlorophyll content and growth of Festuca rubra[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2009(6): 24-27.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2009.06.006
[22]	任健, 杨春勐, 代微然, 等.遮荫对冷季型混播草坪土壤呼吸速率、温度及生物量的影响[J].草原与草坪, 2014, 34(6):37-40, 44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2014.06.006 REN J, YANG C M, DAI W R, et al.Effects of shade on soil respiration, temperatureand biomass in mixed cool season turf[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2014, 34(6):37-40, 44.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2014.06.006
[23]	RICHARDSON M D.Morphology, turf quality, and heat tolerance of intermediate ryegrass[J]. Hortscience, 2004, 39(1):170-173. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.39.1.170