• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

高通量测序分析根结线虫对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响

张丽芳 李艳琼 蔡建 高秀 徐晴芳 刘威良 杨卫星 胡海林

张丽芳,李艳琼,蔡建,等. 高通量测序分析根结线虫对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(8):936−941 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.010
引用本文: 张丽芳,李艳琼,蔡建,等. 高通量测序分析根结线虫对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响 [J]. 福建农业学报,2021,36(8):936−941 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.010
ZHANG L F, LI Y Q, CAI J, et al. High-Throughput Sequencing on Fungal Diversity in Potato Rhizosphere Soil Infested by Root-knot Nematodes [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(8):936−941 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.010
Citation: ZHANG L F, LI Y Q, CAI J, et al. High-Throughput Sequencing on Fungal Diversity in Potato Rhizosphere Soil Infested by Root-knot Nematodes [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2021,36(8):936−941 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.010

高通量测序分析根结线虫对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.08.010
基金项目: 云南省科技计划计划青年项目(2018FD080);曲靖师范学院青年项目(2019QN002)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张丽芳(1987−),女,博士,讲师,研究方向:植物病理(E-mail:752859175@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    胡海林(1986−),男,硕士,助教,研究方向:马铃薯病害(E-mail:243902676@qq.com

  • 中图分类号: S 154; S 532

High-Throughput Sequencing on Fungal Diversity in Potato Rhizosphere Soil Infested by Root-knot Nematodes

  • 摘要:   目的  分析根结线虫对马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性的影响。  方法  通过高通量测序技术、土壤性质测定及生物信息学技术分析感染根结线虫马铃薯和健康马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落多样性差异。  结果  从6个土壤样品中共获得3界12门34纲77目171科332属526种的土壤真菌。对物种多样性指数分析后,发现感染根结线虫马铃薯病株与健康马铃薯植株的根际土壤真菌群落多样性和土壤性质均存在显著性差异。对6个样品进行物种组成分析后,在门水平中,感病植株根际土壤真菌Basidiomycota丰度较健康植株根际土壤真菌丰度高,Ascomycota丰度低于健康植株根际土壤;在科水平中,病株根际土壤丰度较高的菌群有Nectriaceae和Trimorphomycetaceae;在属水平中,健康植株根际土壤丰度较高的菌群为镰刀菌属Fusarium、被孢霉属Mortierella和未知分类毛壳菌科属unclassified_f_Chaetomiaceae  结论  感染根结线虫的马铃薯与健康马铃薯根际土壤真菌群落丰度在门、科和属水平上均存在差异,为进一步研究马铃薯根结线虫的发生和防治提供了新的思路。
  • 图  1  97%相似度时土壤样品的稀释曲线

    Figure  1.  Dilution plots of soil specimens at 97% similarity

    图  2  两组样品中土壤真菌韦恩图

    Figure  2.  Venn diagram on fungi identified in two sample groups

    图  3  门水平上真菌群落结构

    Figure  3.  Structure of fungi community at phylum level

    图  4  科水平上真菌群落结构

    Figure  4.  Structure of fungi community at family level

    图  5  属水平上真菌群落结构

    Figure  5.  Structure of fungi community at genus level

    表  1  不同样品土壤性质

    Table  1.   Properties of soil specimens

    样品编号
    Sample ID
    pH有机质
    OM/(g·kg−1
    速效磷
    AP/(mg·kg−1
    速效钾
    AK/(mg·kg−1
    速效氮
    AN/(mg·kg−1
    MLE14.72±0.05 b1.33±0.20 b277.37±0.78 c423.51±0.32 bc57.39±0.28 de
    MLE24.62±0.03 b1.27±0.14 b265.43±0.63 d420.19±0.19 c56.12±0.25 e
    MLE34.80±0.02 b1.28±0.30 b278.54±0.24 c425.85±0.18 ab60.44±0.19 cd
    MLCK15.13±0.13 a2.33±0.33 a286.83±0.56 b426.92±0.45 ab66.41±0.78 a
    MLCK25.30±0.32 a2.82±0.18 a293.35±0.36 a427.32±0.67 ab64.00±0.57 ab
    MLCK35.22±0.46 a2.74±0.36 a279.72±0.67 c428.28±0.46 a61.23±0.42 bc
    注:同列数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),表2同。
    Note: Different uppercase letters in the same column represented significant difference(P<0.05), The same as Table 2.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同样品土壤真菌群落的多样性指数

    Table  2.   Diversity indices on fungal communities in soil specimens

    样品编号
    Sample ID
    原始序列
    Original sequences
    有效序列
    Effective sequences
    有效序列率
    Effective data ratio
    多样性指数
    Diversity index
    丰富度指数
    Richness index
    覆盖率
    Coverage
    Shannon-Wiener指数
    Shannon-Wiener
    index
    Simpson指数
    Simpson
    index
    Ace指数
    Ace
    index
    Chao指数
    Chao
    index
    MLE1 52315 51714 0.989 2.83±0.10 c 0.18±0.04 b 744.88±0.42 d 677.05±0.78 d 0.997
    MLE2 56393 55653 0.987 2.59±0.14 c 0.26±0.03 a 574.26±0.25 e 586.08±0.36 e 0.997
    MLE3 65004 64006 0.985 3.64±0.32 b 0.06±0.01 c 731.93±0.12 d 763.33±0.25 c 0.997
    MLCK1 64811 63193 0.975 4.13±0.05 a 0.06±0.01 c 960.73±0.36 c 975.25±0.65 b 0.997
    MLCK2 68180 65857 0.966 4.09±0.23 a 0.05±0.01 c 977.19±0.83 b 978.84±0.45 b 0.997
    MLCK3 68295 66066 0.967 4.04±0.14 a 0.06±0.02 c 1013.80±0.46 a 1024.59±0.88 a 0.997
    注:数据后不同小写字母表示处理间差异达显著水平
    Note:Data with different lowercase letters indicated significant difference (P<0.05).
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] MARKS R, BRODIE B. Potato cyst nematodes, biology, distribution and control [J]. Potato Cyst Nematodes Biology Distribution and Control, 1998, 5(2): 79−86.
    [2] 徐春玲, 陈淳, 周春娜, 等. 马铃薯根际3种植物线虫种类记述 [J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2012, 33(2):167−170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2012.02.010

    XU C L, CHEN C, ZHOU C N, et al. Description of Three New Recorded Species of Plant Parasitic Nematodes Extracted from Rhizosphere of Potato in China [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2012, 33(2): 167−170.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-411X.2012.02.010
    [3] OKA Y, KOLTAI H, BAR-EYAL M, et al. New strategies for the control of plant-parasitic Nematodes [J]. Pest Management Science, 2000, 56(11): 983−988. doi: 10.1002/1526-4998(200011)56:11<983::AID-PS233>3.0.CO;2-X
    [4] DACKMAN C, NORDBRING-HERTZ B. Fungal parasites of the cereal cyst nematode Heterodera avenae in southern Sweden [J]. Journal of Nematology, 1985, 17(1): 50−55.
    [5] KHAN T A, SAXENA S K. Effect of root-dip treatment with culture filtrates of soil fungi on multiplication of Meloidogyne javanica and yield of tomato [J]. Test of Agrochemical and Cultivars, 1997(18): 50−51.
    [6] TOJU H, TANABE A S, SATO H. Network hubs in root-associated fungal metacommunities [J]. Microbiome, 2018, 6(1): 116. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0497-1
    [7] 杨树军, 雷丽萍, 祝明亮, 等. 烟草根结线虫生物防治方法应用研究 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2004, 17(S1):151−154.

    YANG S J, LEI L P, ZHU M L, et al. Screening of the parasitical fungi of root knot nematode in tobacco [J]. Southwestern China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2004, 17(S1): 151−154.(in Chinese)
    [8] MENDES R, KRUIJT M, DE BRUIJN I, et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria [J]. Science, 2011, 332(6033): 1097−1100. doi: 10.1126/science.1203980
    [9] UROZ S, BUEEÉ M, MURAT C, et al. Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil [J]. Env Microbiol Rep, 2010, 2(2): 281−288. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00117.x
    [10] WEINERT N, PICENO Y, DING G C, et al. PhyloChip hybridization uncovered an enormous bacterial diversity in the rhizosphere of different potato cultivars: Many common and few cultivar-dependent taxa [J]. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2011, 75(3): 497−506. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01025.x
    [11] PIRES A C C, CLEARY D F R, ALMEIDA A, et al. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and barcoded pyrosequencing reveal unprecedented archaeal diversity in mangrove sediment and rhizosphere samples [J]. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(16): 5520−5528. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00386-12
    [12] BULGARELLI D, ROTT M, SCHLAEPPI K, et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota [J]. Nature, 2012, 488(7409): 91−95. doi: 10.1038/nature11336
    [13] 楼骏, 柳勇, 李延, 等. 高通量测序技术在土壤微生物多样性研究中的研究进展 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(15):256−260. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2513

    LOU J, LIU Y, LI Y, et al. Review of High-throughput sequencing techniques in studies of soil microbial diversity [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(15): 256−260.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2513
    [14] 董艳辉, 于宇凤, 温鑫, 等. 基于高通量测序的藜麦连作根际土壤微生物多样性研究 [J]. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(2):205−211. doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751218

    DONG Y H, YU Y F, WEN X, et al. Studies on diversity of rhizosphere microorganism in quinoa continuous cropping Soil by High Throughput Sequencing [J]. Acta Agriculture Boreali-Sinica, 2019, 34(2): 205−211.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751218
    [15] 张骏达, 李素艳, 孙向阳, 等. 基于高通量测序技术的不同年代公园绿地土壤细菌多样性 [J]. 微生物学通报, 2019, 46(1):65−74.

    ZHANG J D, LI S Y, SUN X Y, et al. Analysis of soil bacterial diversity in urban parks with different ages by high throughput sequencing [J]. Microbiology China, 2019, 46(1): 65−74.(in Chinese)
    [16] 汪娅婷, 付丽娜, 姬广海, 等. 基于高通量测序技术研究云南玉米根际微生物群落多样性 [J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):491−500.

    WANG Y T, FU L N, JI G H, et al. A study of the microbial community diversity of corn rhizosphere in Yunnan province based on High-Throughput Sequencing Technique [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2019, 41(3): 491−500.(in Chinese)
    [17] 王艳云, 郭笃发. 不同植物类型下土壤真菌群落研究 [J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2017, 36(2):696−701.

    WANG Y Y, GUO D F. Study on Soil Fungal Community under Different Plant Types [J]. Genomics and Applied Biology, 2017, 36(2): 696−701.(in Chinese)
    [18] ADAMS R I, MILETTO M, TAYLOR J W, et al. Dispersal in microbes: fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances [J]. The ISME Journal, 2013, 7(7): 1262−1273. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.28
    [19] LAURENT P, VOIBLET C, TAGU D, et al. A novel class of ectomycorrhiza-regulated cell wall polpeptides in Pisolithus tinctorius [J]. Mol Plant Microbe, 1999, 12(10): 862−871. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1999.12.10.862
    [20] HELGASON T, FITTER A H. Natural selection and the evolutionary ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Phylum Glomeromycota) [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2009, 60(9): 2465−2480. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp144
    [21] NONAKA K, KANETA T, ŌMURA S, et al. Mariannaea macrochlamydospora, a new hyphomycete (Nectriaceae) from soil in the Bonin Islands, Japan [J]. Mycoscience, 2015, 56(1): 29−33. doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2014.02.001
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  733
  • HTML全文浏览量:  222
  • PDF下载量:  35
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-03-08
  • 修回日期:  2021-06-19
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-08-10
  • 刊出日期:  2021-08-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回