文心兰杂交后代的EST-SSR和SRAP分子标记鉴定

林榕燕; 罗远华; 樊荣辉; 叶秀仙; 方能炎; 钟淮钦; 黄敏玲

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.007

文心兰杂交后代的EST-SSR和SRAP分子标记鉴定

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.007

福建省农业科学院作物研究所/福建省特色花卉工程技术研究中心，福建　福州　350013

基金项目: 福建省科技计划公益类专项（2020R1031009）；福建省农业科学院科研项目（A2017-6）；福建省农业科学院科技创新团队建设（CXTD2021010-2）；福建省农业高质量发展超越“5511”协同创新工程项目（XTCXGC2021016）

详细信息

作者简介:
林榕燕（1990−），女，助理研究员，研究方向：花卉生物技术研究（E-mail：lryyan@163.com）

通讯作者:
黄敏玲（1960−），女，研究员，研究方向：花卉品种选育与生物技术研究（E-mail：huangml618@163.com）

中图分类号: S 682.31
计量
- 文章访问数: 377
- HTML全文浏览量: 85
- PDF下载量: 28
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-22
- 修回日期: 2021-06-27
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-28

Identification of Hybrid Progenies from Oncidium Hybridum with EST-SSR and SRAP Molecular Markers

Crop Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Fujian Engineering Research Center for Characteristic Floriculture, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的采用EST-SSR和SRAP分子标记技术，对文心兰杂交后代株系进行鉴定，以期为文心兰杂种后代的真实性鉴定提供方法。方法以文心兰黄金午后、百万金币及其46个杂交后代株系为试验材料，从21对文心兰EST-SSR引物和176对SRAP引物组合中筛选出具有父本特征带且带型清晰稳定的有效引物，利用筛选出的有效引物对供试材料进行扩增，根据扩增结果进行文心兰杂交后代真实性鉴定、聚类分析及遗传相似系数分析。结果共筛选出6对EST-SSR引物和10对SRAP引物组合用于文心兰杂交后代真实性鉴定，供试的46个杂交后代株系均鉴定为真杂种；6对EST-SSR引物共扩增到34个多态性条带，多态性比例为87.18%，10对SRAP引物组合共扩增到81个多态性条带，多态性比例为81.82%；从聚类结果可以看出，供试的杂交后代株系与母本的亲缘关系较近；遗传相似系数分析发现，杂交后代与母本间的平均遗传相似系数大于父本，说明供试的杂交后代在遗传上更偏向母本，与聚类结果相吻合。结论 EST-SSR和SRAP分子标记技术均可有效应用于文心兰杂交后代真实性鉴定研究。
- 文心兰 /
- EST-SSR /
- SRAP /
- 杂交后代鉴定
Abstract: Objective A method to verify authenticity of an Oncidium hybrid progeny was developed based on the EST-SSR and SRAP molecular markers for cultivar selection at early stage. Method In this study, Wil. ‘Rich Yellow’, Onc. ‘Million Dollar’ and their 46 hybrid progenies were used as test materials. The effective primers with patermal characteristic bands, while the bands were clear and stable, were screened from 21 pairs of EST-SSR primers and 176 pairs of SRAP primer combinations. Then, the selected effective primers were used to amplify the test materials. According to the amplification results, the authenticity identification, cluster analysis and genetic similarity coefficient analysis of the hybrid progenies were carried out. Result Six pairs of EST-SSR primers and 10 pairs of SRAP primer combinations were chosen for the verification on 46 hybrid progenies. From the EST-SSR primers 34 polymorphic bands were obtained with 87.18% polymorphic loci, while the SRAP primer combinations rendered 81 polymorphic bands with 81.82% polymorphic loci. From the clustering results, we can see that all the hybrid progeny strains were closely related to the female parent. The average genetic similarity coefficient between hybrid progenies and female was higher than that of the male parent, indicating that the hybrid progenies are closer to female parent in heredity, which was consistent with the results of clustering analysis. Conclusion EST-SSR and SRAP molecular markers can be effectively used in the study of authenticity identification of hybrid progenies of Oncidium hybridum.
- Oncidium hybridum /
- EST-SSR /
- SRAP /
- identification of hybrid progenies

HTML全文

图 1 文心兰杂交后代的EST-SSR引物Hga15（A）和SRAP引物组合Me1+Em3（B）鉴定结果

注：M：DL2 000 marker；父本♂：百万金币；母本♀：黄金午后；1～46：对应46个杂交后代株系；箭头所示为父本特征带。

Figure 1. Identification of Oncidium hybrid progenies using EST-SSR primer Hga15 (A) and SRAP primer combinations Me1+Em3 (B)

Note: M: DL2 000 marker; ♂: Million Dollar; ♀: Rich Yellow; 1-46 corresponding to the 46 filial generation ; Arrows were feature bands of male parent.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 基于EST-SSR和SRAP分子标记的文心兰聚类分析

Figure 2. Clustering Oncidium based on EST-SSR and SRAP molecular markers

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 文心兰亲本与杂种间遗传相似系数

Figure 3. Coefficients of genetic similarity between Oncidium parents and hybrid progenies

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 亲本来源及主要性状

Table 1. Source and main traits of the parents

品种 Variety	杂交亲本 Hybrid parents	主要用途 Main purpose	主要性状 Main traits
黄金午后 Golden Afternoon ‘Rich Yellow’	Cda．× Odm．× Onc．	盆花、切花 Potted flowers, cut flowers	花被片黄色与褐色相间，具花香 Tepals are yellow and brown, with floral fragrance
百万金币 Sweet Sugar ‘Million Dollar’	Onc. × Onc.	盆花 Potted flowers	花黄色具条纹褐斑，无花香 Flowers are yellow with striped brown spots, no floral fragrance

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 文心兰杂交后代鉴定的EST-SSR和SRAP标记引物信息

Table 2. Information on EST-SSR and SRAP primer pairs used for Oncidium hybrid progeny identification

引物 Primers	正向引物序列 Forward primer sequences	反向引物序列 Reverse primer sequences	父本特征带数 No. of male specific fragments	鉴定出的杂交后代数 No. of the identified hybrids
Hga15	5′-ATCGTAATCCTGAAGCGTATC-3′	5′-AAGCCCAAACTATTCCATT-3′	2	46
Hcac7	5′-AAAACTCCCACTTATCCAAA-3′	5′-CCCTGTATTATCGCCGTAG-3′	1	28
Hga29	5′-AGTGCCTCTATCATTCCTCT-3′	5′-GTTGTGCGGGTTAGTTGG-3′	2	40
Htc26	5′-TTCGGCCATTAACGGTCC-3′	5′-TGTGATTTCTTGGGGTGC-3′	3	38
Hga19	5′-GCAAACGCACAACACGAC-3′	5′-AGAAAGCAATGGCGAAGC-3′	6	46
Htag5	5′-AAAATCTTACTCACCACCTCC-3′	5′-GCATACTTTCCTCGCCAC-3′	2	10
Me1+Em3	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGATA-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTGAC-3′	5	46
Me3+Em1	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGAAT-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTAAT-3′	2	33
Me4+Em7	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGACC-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTATG-3′	4	45
Me6+Em2	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGTAA-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTTGC-3′	3	37
Me6+Em7	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGTAA-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTATG-3′	2	40
Me6+Em8	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGTAA-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTCTG-3′	3	46
Me7+Em1	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGTCC-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTAAT-3′	5	37
Me8+Em1	5′-TGAGTCCAAACCGGTGC-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTAAT-3′	7	44
Me10+Em2	5′-TGGGGACAACCCGGCTT-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTTGC-3′	4	46
Me10+Em16	5′-TGGGGACAACCCGGCTT-3′	5′-GACTGCGTACGAATTCGG-3′	4	44

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 文心兰EST-SSR和SRAP引物多态性分析

Table 3. Polymorphism of EST-SSR and SRAP primer pairs of Oncidium

引物名 Primer	总条带 Total band	多态性条带 Polymorphism band	多态性比率 Polymorphism percentage/%	多态性信息含量 Polymorphism information content
Hga15	3	3	100.00	0.66
Hcac7	6	5	83.33	0.83
Hga29	6	5	83.33	0.80
Htc26	6	6	100.00	0.80
Hga19	10	9	90.00	0.87
Htag5	8	6	75.00	0.85
Me1+Em3	8	6	75.00	0.86
Me3+Em1	8	6	75.00	0.85
Me4+Em7	10	7	70.00	0.89
Me6+Em2	8	7	87.50	0.85
Me6+Em7	7	6	85.71	0.85
Me6+Em8	9	6	66.67	0.87
Me7+Em1	11	11	100.00	0.85
Me8+Em1	16	11	68.75	0.92
Me10+Em2	11	11	100.00	0.88
Me10+Em16	11	10	90.91	0.89

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	王培育, 郑世仲, 叶炜, 等. 文心兰挥发性成分的GC-MS分析 [J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2020, 16(3):175−179. WANG P Y, ZHENG S Z, YE W, et al. GC-MS analysis of volatile components of Oncidium hybridum [J]. Subtropical Agriculture Research, 2020, 16(3): 175−179.(in Chinese)
[2]	冯保云, 李蓉, 赖钟雄, 等. 文心兰HSP70基因的克隆及表达分析 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(4):745−754. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.016 FENG B Y, LI R, LAI Z X, et al. Cloning and expression analysis of HSP70 in Oncidiumhybridum [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 745−754.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.016
[3]	罗远华, 黄敏玲, 林兵, 等. 文心兰杂种胚培养研究 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(8):839−843. LUO Y H, HUANG M L, LIN B, et al. Embryo culture for orchid hybrid crossedbetween beallara marfitch and Oncidium sweet sugar [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(8): 839−843.(in Chinese)
[4]	吕复兵, 周芳, 朱根发. 文心兰杂交结实性研究 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2008, 35(7):52−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2008.07.019 LYU F B, ZHOU F, ZHU G F. Study on Oncidium hybrid seed setting [J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 35(7): 52−53.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2008.07.019
[5]	罗远华, 林兵, 叶秀仙, 等. 高产优质文心兰新品种金辉的选育 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(1):40−45. LUO Y H, LIN B, YE X X, et al. Breeding a high-yield premium Oncidium, Jinhui [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(1): 40−45.(in Chinese)
[6]	王燕君, 王亚平, 张乐萍, 等. 盆栽文心兰新品种‘玉香’ [J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(12):2555−2556. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0513-353X.2013.12.035 WANG Y J, WANG Y P, ZHANG L P, et al. A new potted Oncidium cultivar ‘fragrant jade' [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2013, 40(12): 2555−2556.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0513-353X.2013.12.035
[7]	刘玉洋, 徐靖, 何金宇, 等. 铁皮石斛和金钗石斛杂交后代的分子鉴定 [J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(9):1709−1713. LIU Y Y, XU J, HE J Y, et al. Identification of offsprings from hybridization of Dendrobium officinale × Dendrobium nobile [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(9): 1709−1713.(in Chinese)
[8]	杨柳燕, 杨贞, 蔡友铭, 等. SRAP分子标记在铁皮石斛后代品种鉴定中的应用 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(17):5690−5695. YANG L Y, YANG Z, CAI Y M, et al. Application of SRAP markers in offspring identification of Dendrobium officinale [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(17): 5690−5695.(in Chinese)
[9]	刘雪骄, 王明玖, 索荣臻. 利用SRAP分子标记鉴定内蒙古栽培大豆与野生大豆杂交后代真实性 [J]. 大豆科学, 2017, 36(2):193−198. LIU X J, WANG M J, SUO R Z. The authentic evaluation on hybrids of wild soybean and cultivated soybean based on SRAP marker in Inner Mongolia [J]. Soybean Science, 2017, 36(2): 193−198.(in Chinese)
[10]	孙宇明, 冯丽媛, 李琬玥, 等. SRAP分子标记鉴定百合杂交后代 [J]. 上海交通大学学报(农业科学版), 2015, 33(1):53−58. SUN Y M, FENG L Y, LI W Y, et al. Identification of lily hybrid offspring by SRAP molecular marker [J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (Agricultural Science), 2015, 33(1): 53−58.(in Chinese)
[11]	叶新如, 刘建汀, 李永平, 等. 基于EST-SSR标记的MCID法鉴定冬瓜种质资源 [J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(4):780−788. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.04.0780 YE X R, LIU J T, LI Y P, et al. Identification of wax gourd by using EST-SSR markers-based MCID method [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(4): 780−788.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2021.04.0780
[12]	PREETHI P, RAHMAN S, NAGANEESWARAN S, et al. Development of EST-SSR markers for genetic diversity analysis in coconut (Cocos nucifera L. ) [J]. Molecular Biology Reports, 2020, 47(12): 9385−9397. doi: 10.1007/s11033-020-05981-8
[13]	ZOU X H, HUANG X L, ZHANG L Q, et al. Characterization of Est-SSR markers related to Colletotrichum fructicola infection in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duchase) [J]. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2020, 34(1): 680−689.
[14]	孙清明, 马帅鹏, 马文朝, 等. 荔枝两个F₁杂交群体的EST-SSR鉴定及多样性分析 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2014, 12(1):87−95. SUN Q M, MA S P, MA W C, et al. Identification and genetic diversity analysis of two F1 hybrid populations of Litchi(Litchi chinensis sonn. ) using EST-SSR markers [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2014, 12(1): 87−95.(in Chinese)
[15]	罗远华, 黄敏玲, 林兵, 等. 文心兰花粉活力与杂交结荚性研究 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2015, 30(3):258−263. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.03.010 LUO Y H, HUANG M L, LIN B, et al. Studying on pollen viability and hybrid pod setting ability of Oncidium [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(3): 258−263.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.03.010
[16]	POREBSKI S, BAILEY L G, BAUM B R. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components [J]. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 1997, 15(1): 8−15. doi: 10.1007/BF02772108
[17]	BUDAK H, SHEARMAN R C, PARMAKSIZ I, et al. Molecular characterization of Buffalograss germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers [J]. TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik, 2004, 108(2): 328−334. doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1428-4
[18]	林榕燕, 钟淮钦, 黄敏玲, 等. 文心兰EST-SSR标记的开发及其在遗传多样性分析中的应用 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2016, 14(11):3113−3119. LIN R Y, ZHONG H Q, HUANG M L, et al. Development of EST-SSR molecular marker and its application in genetic diversity analysis of Oncidium [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2016, 14(11): 3113−3119.(in Chinese)
[19]	ILBI H. RAPD markers assisted varietal identification and genetic purity test in pepper, Capsicum annuum [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2003, 97(3/4): 211−218.
[20]	李胜男, 张明月, 李晓龙, 等. 苹果和梨远缘杂种后代的鉴定 [J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2021, 29(2):393−401. LI S N, ZHANG M Y, LI X L, et al. Identification of progenies of distant hybrids of apple (Malus) and pear(Pyrus) [J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2021, 29(2): 393−401.(in Chinese)
[21]	尹跃, 赵建华, 何昕孺, 等. 枸杞种间杂交F₁群体的SSR鉴定及遗传分析 [J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(12):2027−2034. YIN Y, ZHAO J H, HE X R, et al. Hybrid identification and genetic analysis in wolfberry F1 population using SSR markers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 2027−2034.(in Chinese)
[22]	胡凤荣, 何国仁, 王斐, 等. 利用ISSR分子标记方法鉴定风信子杂种后代 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2015, 13(6):1336−1342. HU F R, HE G R, WANG F, et al. The identification of the hyacinth hybrid progeny by the method of ISSR molecular marker [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2015, 13(6): 1336−1342.(in Chinese)
[23]	刘颖鑫, 李沛曈, 迟天华, 等. 菊花脑×甘菊种间F₁杂种的鉴定和遗传多样性分析 [J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(8):1553−1564. LIU Y X, LI P T, CHI T H, et al. Identification and genetic diversity analysis of interspecific F1 hybrids between Chrysanthemum nankingense × C. lavandulifolium [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(8): 1553−1564.(in Chinese)
[24]	高轶静, 方锋学, 刘昔辉, 等. 甘蔗与斑茅割手密复合体杂交后代的分子标记鉴定 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(5):912−916. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1810.2012.05.034 GAO Y J, FANG F X, LIU X H, et al. Identification of progeny from crosses between sugarcane(Saccharum spp. )and intergeneric hybrid complex(Erianthus arundinaceus × Saccharum spontaneum)with molecular markers [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2012, 13(5): 912−916.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1810.2012.05.034
[25]	忻雅, 方献平, 王淑珍, 等. 简单重复序列标记和序列相关扩增多态性标记在草莓遗传多样性分析中的比较 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2019, 45(3):278−287. XIN Y, FANG X P, WANG S Z, et al. Comparison of simple sequence repeat (SSR) and sequence related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers for genetic diversity analysis in strawberry [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2019, 45(3): 278−287.(in Chinese)
[26]	吴洋洋, 仰小东, 杨信程, 等. 菊花不完全双列杂交F₁代遗传关系的SRAP分析 [J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(6):1116−1124. WU Y Y, YANG X D, YANG X C, et al. Genetic relationship among Chrysanthemum F1 hybrids derived from an incomplete diallel cross unraveled by SRAP markers [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(6): 1116−1124.(in Chinese)
[27]	STAFNE E T, CLARK J R. Genetic relatedness among eastern North American blackberry cultivars based on pedigree analysis [J]. Euphytica, 2004, 139(2): 95−104. doi: 10.1007/s10681-004-2436-4