基于光谱特征参数的琯溪蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量估算

栗方亮; 孔庆波; 张青

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.008

基于光谱特征参数的琯溪蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量估算

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2021.12.008

福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所, 福建　福州　350013

基金项目: 福建省自然科学基金项目（2019J01106）；福建省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项（2021R1025008）

详细信息

作者简介:
栗方亮（1980−），男，博士，助理研究员，研究方向：土壤生态与植物营养（E-mail：lifl007@qq.com）

通讯作者:
孔庆波（1978−），男，博士，副研究员，研究方向：植物营养与水肥一体化（E-mail:qbkong@qq.com）

中图分类号: S 666.3; S 127
计量
- 文章访问数: 455
- HTML全文浏览量: 160
- PDF下载量: 27
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-04-20
- 修回日期: 2021-09-13
- 网络出版日期: 2021-12-30
- 刊出日期: 2021-12-28

Spectral Measurements-based Estimation for Chlorophyll in Guanxi Honey Pomelo Leaves

Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的利用光谱特征参数建立蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量估算模型，为实现快速、无损、精确的叶绿素含量估算提供理论依据和技术支持。方法通过提取原始光谱及一阶微分光谱特征波段和光谱特征变量，分析蜜柚叶片高光谱特征参数与叶绿素相对含量（SPAD）值之间的相关关系，构建单变量估算模型和多元回归模型，并确定蜜柚叶绿素含量的最佳估算模型。结果在350～1050 nm的波段，不同SPAD 值的蜜柚叶片反射光谱存在明显差异，光谱反射率均随叶片叶绿素含量升高而降低。原始光谱和一阶微分光谱与叶绿素含量在可见光范围内有多波段相关性显著。原始光谱曲线敏感波长为576 nm和701 nm，一阶微分曲线的敏感波长为691 nm和748 nm。在利用光谱特征参数建立的回归模型中，根据拟合验证精度筛选出多个拟合模型，其中多元回归模型Y_SPAD=54.67−15.75 NDVI′_691,748−10.60 GRVI_550,770+6565.6 R′₆₉₁−6784.58 DVI′_691,748，其拟合决定系数R²为0.894，验证决定系数R²为0.8356，RMSE为7.07，可确定为蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量的最佳预测模型；而一阶微分归一化植被指数NDVI′_691,748和差值植被指数DVI′_691,748为单变量的回归模型的拟合决定系数R²分别为0.824和0.798，验证决定系数R²分别为0.797和0.7918，RMSE分别为13.21和12.56。结论综合建模精度和模型验证精度，基于高光谱指数NDVI′_691,748、GRVI_550,770、R′₆₉₁和DVI′_691,748的多元回归模型可确定为蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量的最佳估算模型。
- 高光谱 /
- 蜜柚 /
- 叶绿素 /
- 光谱指数
Abstract: Objective A hyperspectral estimation model for the chlorophyll content in the leaves of honey pomelo was developed using spectral measurements on the characteristic parameters for the establishment of a rapid, noninvasive, accurate determination method. Method Characteristic bands of spectrum of the leaves were obtained. The first-order differential spectrum and spectral characteristic variables were used to analyze the correlation between the hyperspectral bands and the relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) of pomelo leaves. Univariate estimation and multiple regression models were constructed and compared to arrive at the best prediction model. Result At the wavelengths between 350 nm and 1 050 nm, the reflectance spectra on the pomelo leaves of varied SPADs decreased significantly with increasing chlorophyll content. SPAD significantly correlated with either the original or the first-order differential spectrum at several wavelengths in the visible light range. The sensitive wavelengths for the original spectral curve were 576 nm and 701 nm, and 691 nm and 748 nm for the first order differential spectrum. Based on the precision of fitting, the one that based on the hyperspectral Y_SPAD=54.67−15.75 NDVI_′691,748−10.60 GRVI_550,770+6 565.6 R′₆₉₁−6 784.58 DVI′_691,748 of 3 multiple regression models displayed the R² of 0.894, the verification R² of 0.835 6, and the RMSE of 7.07 and was selected. The univariate regression models applied the first-order differential normalized vegetation index NDVI′_691,748 and the differential vegetation index DVI′_691,748 had R² of 0.824 and 0.798, respectively, the validation R² of 0.797 and 0.7918, respectively, and RMSEs of 13.21 and 12.56, respectively. Conclusion The multiple regression model based on hyperspectral indices NDVI′_691,748, GRVI_550,770, R′₆₉₁ and DVI′_691,748 could be adequately applied for estimating chlorophyll content of honey pomelo leaves.
- Hyperspectral /
- honey pomelo /
- chlorophyll /
- spectral parameters

HTML全文

图 1 不同叶绿素含量的蜜柚叶片高光谱曲线

Figure 1. Hyperspectral curves of pomelo leaves with varied chlorophyll contents

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量与原始光谱反射率的相关性

Figure 2. Correlation between chlorophyll content and original reflectance spectrum of pomelo leaves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量与一阶光谱反射率的相关性

Figure 3. Correlation between chlorophyll content and first-order reflectance spectrum of pomelo leaves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 蜜柚叶片SPAD实测值与预测值比较

Figure 4. Measured and predicted SPADs of pomelo leaves

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 蜜柚叶片样本的SPAD值

Table 1. SPADs of pomelo leaf samples

组别 Group	样本数 Sample number	最小值 Minimum value	最大值 Maximum value	平均值 Average value	标准偏差 Standard deviation
SPAD1	30	26.46	43.43	35.57	4.63
SPAD2	30	46.25	78.46	68.61	4.95
SPAD3	30	78.80	85.21	81.14	4.35
验证组 Validation group	30	26.12	77.21	53.61	16.56

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 选取的高光谱特征参数及说明

Table 2. Selected hyperspectral characteristic parameters and descriptions

光谱特征参数类型 Type of spectral characteristic parameter	光谱特征参数名称 Name of spectral characteristic parameter	光谱特征参数说明 Description of spectral characteristic parameter
光谱位置变量 Spectral position variable	D_b（蓝边幅值Blue edge amplitude）	490～530 nm内一阶微分的最大值 Maximum value of first-order differential in 490-530 nm
	D_y（黄边幅值Yellow edge amplitude）	560～640 nm内一阶微分的最大值 Maximum value of first-order differential in 560-640 nm
	D_r（红边幅值Red edge amplitude）	680～760 nm内一阶微分的最大值 Maximum value of first-order differential in 680-760 nm
	λ_b（蓝边位置Blue edge position）	D_b对应的波长位置Wavelength position corresponding to D_b
	λ_y（黄边位置Yellow edge position）	D_y对应的波长位置 Wavelength position corresponding to D_y
	λ_r（红边位置Red edge position）	D_r对应的波长位置 Wavelength position corresponding to D_r
	R_g（绿峰幅值Green peak amplitude）	510～560 nm内光谱反射率的最大值 Maximum spectral reflectance in 510-560 nm
	R_r（红谷幅值Red valley amplitude）	640～680 nm内光谱反射率的最小值 Minimum spectral reflectance in 640-680 nm
光谱面积变量 Spectral area variable	SD_b（蓝边面积Blue edge area）	490～530 nm内一阶微分光谱值的总和 Sum of first-order differential spectral values in 490-530 nm
	SD_y（黄边面积Yellow edge area）	560～640 nm内一阶微分光谱值的总和 Sum of first-order differential spectral values in 560-640 nm
	SD_r（红边面积Red edge area）	680～760 nm内一阶微分光谱值的总和 Sum of first-order differential spectral values in 680-760 nm
	VI1=R_g/R_r	绿峰R_g与红谷R_r幅值的比值 Ratio of green peak amplitude R_g to red valley amplitude R_r
	VI2=（R_g−R_r）/（R_g+R_r）	绿峰R_g与红谷R_r幅值的归一化值 Normalized value of green peak amplitude R_g to red valley amplitude R_r
	VI3=SD_r/SD_b	红边与蓝边面积比值 Ratio of red edge area to blue edge area
	VI4=（SD_r−SD_b）/（SD_r+SD_b）	红边与蓝边面积的归一化值 Normalized value of red edge area and blue edge area
植被指数变量 Vegetation index variable	DVI（差值植被指数Difference vegetation index）	DVI_{(λ1, λ2)}= R_λ1− R_λ2
	RVI（比值植被指数Ratio vegetation index）	RVI_{(λ1, λ2)}= R_λ1/R_λ2
	NDVI（归一化植被指数 Normalized difference vegetation index）	NDVI_{(λ1, λ2)}=( R_λ1− R_λ2)/（R_λ1+ R_λ2）
	GRVI（绿波段比值植被指数 Green band ratio vegetation index）	GRVI_{(550, 770)}= R₅₅₀/ R₇₇₀
	GNDVI（绿波段归一化植被指数 Green band normalized difference vegetation index）	GNDVI_{(550, 770)} =( R₅₅₀−R₇₇₀)/（R₅₅₀+ R₇₇₀）

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 光谱特征参数及敏感波段植被指数与蜜柚叶绿素含量相关关系

Table 3. Correlation between spectral characteristic parameters, sensitive band vegetation indices and chlorophyll contents of pomelo leaves

光谱特征参数名称 Name of spectral characteristic parameter	相关系数r Correlation coefficient	光谱特征参数名称 Name of spectral characteristic parameter	相关系数r Correlation coefficient
D_b	−0.703**	VI4	0.744**
D_y	0.255	R₅₇₆	−0.799**
D_r	−0.532**	R₇₀₁	−0.829**
λ_b	0.498**	R′₆₉₁	−0.900**
λ_y	−0.134	R′₇₄₈	0. 940**
λ_r	0.707**	DVI_576,701	0.718**
R_g	−0.734**	RVI_576,701	0.620**
R_r	−0.525**	NDVI_576,701	−0.560**
SD_b	−0.716**	DVI′_691,748	0.880**
SD_y	−0.541**	RVI′_691,748	0.708**
SD_r	0.546**	NDVI′_691,748	0.940**
VI1	−0.714**	GRVI_550,770	0.910**
VI2	−0.738**	GNDVI_550,770	0.850**
VI3	0.745**

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量的单变量估测模型

Table 4. Univariate estimation models for chlorophyll content of pomelo leaves

光谱特征参数名称 Name of spectral characteristic parameter	估测模型 Estimation model	R²	RMSE	RE%
NDVI′_691,748 GRVI_550,770 R′₆₉₁ DVI′_691,748 R′₇₄₈ GNDVI_550,770	Y=71.26−23.82 x−16.46 x² Y=109.38−292.40x+259.51x² Y=80.11+82367.6x+3415x² Y=68.58−5369.37x+195635.43x² Y=20.99+28303.8x−3056x² Y=158.79−460.33x+449.68x²	0.824 0.816 0.802 0.798 0.797 0.796	12.40 13.58 13.98 15.45 15.59 15.98	17.01 18.54 18.98 20.14 20.45 21.41

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 蜜柚叶片叶绿素含量估测模型的拟合精度比较

Table 5. Fitting accuracy of estimation models for chlorophyll content of pomelo leaves

光谱特征参数名称 Name of spectral characteristic parameter	实测值与估测值拟合方程 Fitting equation between measured value and estimated value	R²	RMSE	RE%
NDVI′_691,748 GRVI_550,770 R′₆₉₁ DVI′_691,748 R′₇₄₈ GNDVI_550,770 多元回归 Multiple regression	Y=1.25x−5.6191 Y=1.1633x−0.945 Y=1.1982x−2.8258 Y=1.2451x−5.3558 Y=1.9522x−35.447 Y=0.7895x+14.453 Y=1.2732x−7.2039	0.797 0.7293 0.7535 0.7918 0.7520 0.6044 0.8356	13.21 12.86 11.08 12.56 25.03 9.92 7.07	17.45 17.77 15.59 18.54 36.03 15.99 10.70

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(38)

[1]	张青, 栗方亮, 孔庆波, 等. 不同减量施肥模式对蜜柚产量、品质及经济效益的影响 [J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(3):783−792. ZHANG Q, LI F L, KONG Q B, et al. Effect of different reduced fertigation modes on the yield, quality and economic benefits of honey pomelo [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(3): 783−792.(in Chinese)
[2]	LIU P, SHI R, GAO W. Estimating leaf chlorophyll contents by combining multiple spectral indices with an artificial neural network [J]. Earth Science Informatics, 2018, 11(1): 147−156. doi: 10.1007/s12145-017-0319-1
[3]	AMIRRUDDIN A D, MUHARAM F M, ISMAIL M H, et al. Hyperspectral remote sensing for assessment of chlorophyll sufficiency levels in mature oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) based on frond numbers: analysis of decision tree and random forest. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2020, 169: 105221.
[4]	PENG Z, GUAN L, LIAO Y, et al. Estimating total leaf chlorophyll content of Gannan navel orange leaves using hyperspectral data based on partial least squares regression [J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 155540−155551. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949866
[5]	袁炜楠, 许童羽, 曹英丽, 等. 基于主基底分析降维方法的水稻冠层叶片叶绿素含量估算 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(4):423−430. YUAN W N, XU T Y, CAO Y L, et al. Estimation of chlorophyll content in rice canopy leaves based on main base analysis and dimensionality reduction method [J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agric. & Life Sci. ), 2018, 44(4): 423−430.(in Chinese)
[6]	李恒凯, 王英浩. 甜柚叶绿素含量高光谱无损检测模型[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(2): 126–132. LI H K, WANG Y H. Hyperspectral nondestructive detection model of chlorophyll content of Citrus maxima[J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2019, 40(2): 126–132. (in Chinese)
[7]	姜海玲, 李耀, 赵艺源, 等. 扬花期冬小麦冠层叶绿素含量高光谱遥感反演 [J]. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(3):133−140. JIANG H L, LI Y, ZHAO Y Y, et al. Study on the inversion of winter wheat canopy chlorophyll content during flowering period based on hyperspectral remote sensing [J]. Jounral of Jilin Nomal Unversity (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 41(3): 133−140.(in Chinese)
[8]	梁爽, 赵庚星, 朱西存. 苹果树叶片叶绿素含量高光谱估测模型研究 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2012, 32(5):1367−1370. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2012)05-1367-04 LIANG S, ZHAO G X, ZHU X C. Hyperspectral estimation models of chlorophyll content in apple leaves [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2012, 32(5): 1367−1370.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2012)05-1367-04
[9]	王爱芳, 王妮, 高明, 等. 基于高光谱的香樟叶绿素含量估测模型研究 [J]. 黑龙江工程学院学报, 2018, 32(1):14−19. WANG A F, WANG N, GAO M, et al. Estimation models of camphor leaf chlorophyll content based on proximal hyperspectral remote sensing [J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology, 2018, 32(1): 14−19.(in Chinese)
[10]	KHDERY G, ARAFAT S, ABOELGHAR M, et al. Selection of optimal hyperspectral vegetation indices for estimating chlorophyll content of some plant species [J]. European Chemical Bulletin, 2017, 6(11): 531−535. doi: 10.17628/ecb.2017.6.531-535
[11]	楚万林, 齐雁冰, 常庆瑞, 等. 棉花冠层叶片叶绿素含量与高光谱参数的相关性 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(9):65−73. CHU W L, QI Y B, CHANG Q R, et al. Relationship between chlorophyll content and hyperspectral parameters in canopy leaves of cotton [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Nat. Sci. Ed. ), 2016, 44(9): 65−73.(in Chinese)
[12]	李宗飞, 苏继霞, 费聪, 等. 基于高光谱数据的滴灌甜菜叶绿素含量估算 [J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(5):761−769. LI Z F, SU J X, FEI C, et al. Estimation of chlorophyll content in sugar beet under drip irrigation based on hyperspectral data [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020, 37(5): 761−769.(in Chinese)
[13]	张新乐, 于滋洋, 李厚萱, 等. 东北水稻叶片SPAD遥感光谱估算模型 [J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(1):66−75. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.01.08 ZHANG X L, YU Z Y, LI H X, et al. Remote sensing estimation model of SPAD for rice leaves in Northeast China [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(1): 66−75.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2020.01.08
[14]	GUO T, TAN C, LI Q, et al. Estimating leaf chlorophyll content in tobacco based on various canopy hyperspectral parameters [J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanizd Computing, 2019, 10(1): 3239−3247.
[15]	孙玉婷, 杨红云, 孙爱珍, 等. 水稻叶片SPAD值的高光谱估算模型 [J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(5):1062−1069. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2020.05.010 SUN Y T, YANG H Y, SUN A Z, et al. Hyperspectral estimation model for SPAD value of rice leaves [J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2020, 51(5): 1062−1069.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1191.2020.05.010
[16]	CUI Y, ZHAO H, HUANG C, et al. A new integrated vegetation index for the estimation of winter wheat leaf chlorophyll content [J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(8): 974. doi: 10.3390/rs11080974
[17]	孙小香, 王芳东, 郭熙, 等. 基于水稻冠层高光谱的叶片SPAD值估算模型研究 [J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):444−453. SUN X X, WANG F D, GUO X, et al. The estimation models of rice leaf SPAD value based on canopy spectrum [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(3): 444−453.(in Chinese)
[18]	VANBRABANT Y, TITS L, DELALIEUX S, et al. Multitemporal chlorophyll mapping in pome fruit orchards from remotely piloted aircraft systems [J]. Remote Sensing, 2019, 11(12): 1468. doi: 10.3390/rs11121468
[19]	高金龙, 侯尧宸, 白彦福, 等. 基于高光谱数据的高寒草甸氮磷钾含量估测方法研究-以青海省贵南县及玛沁县高寒草甸为例 [J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3):9−21. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015268 GAO J L, HOU Y C, BAI Y F, et al. Methods for estimating nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium content based on hyperspectral data from alpine meadows in Guinan and Maqin Counties, Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 9−21.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015268
[20]	DIAN Y, LE Y, FANG S, et al. Influence of spectral bandwidth and position on chlorophyll content retrieval at leaf and canopy levels [J]. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2016, 44: 583−593. doi: 10.1007/s12524-015-0537-2
[21]	亚森江·喀哈尔, 尼加提·卡斯木, 茹克亚·萨吾提, 等. 基于高光谱的春小麦抽穗期叶绿素含量估算方法 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(18):266−270. YASENJIANG K, NIJIATI K, RUKEYA S, et al. Estimation method of chlorphyll content at heading stage of spring wheat based on hyperspectral data [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(18): 266−270.(in Chinese)
[22]	陈澜, 常庆瑞, 高一帆, 等. 猕猴桃叶片叶绿素含量高光谱估算模型研究 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(6):79−89,98. CHEN L, CHANG Q R, GAO Y F, et al. Hyperspectral estimation model of chlorophyll content in kiwifruit leaves [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Nat. Sci. Ed. ), 2020, 48(6): 79−89,98.(in Chinese)
[23]	LING B, GOODIN D G, RAYNOR E J, et al. Hyperspectral analysis of leaf pigments and nutritional elements in tallgrass prairie vegetation [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 1−13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00001
[24]	王晓星, 常庆瑞, 刘梦云, 等. 冬小麦冠层水平叶绿素含量的高光谱估测 [J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(2):48−54. WANG X X, CHANG Q R, LIU MY, et al. Hyperspectral estimation of chlorophyll content in canopy of winter wheat [J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University(Nat. Sci. Ed. ), 2016, 44(2): 48−54.(in Chinese)
[25]	于雷, 章涛, 朱亚星, 等. 基于IRIV 算法优选大豆叶片高光谱特征波长变量估测SPAD值 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(16):148−154. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.16.019 YU L, ZHANG T, ZHUY X, et al. Determination of soybean leaf SPAD value using characteristic wavelength variables preferably selected by IRIV algorithm [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering , 2018, 34(16): 148−154.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.16.019
[26]	胥喆, 舒清态, 杨凯博, 等. 基于非成像高光谱的高山松叶绿素估算模型研究 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(2):73−78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.02.12 XU Z, SHU Q T, YANG KB, et al. Estimation models of chlorophyll in pinus densata based on non-imaging hyperspectrum [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(2): 73−78.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.02.12
[27]	余蛟洋, 常庆瑞, 班松涛, 等. 猕猴桃叶片 SPAD 值高光谱估算模型构建 [J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6):168−174. YU J Y, CHANG Q R, BAN S T, et al. Hyperspectral models for estimating SPAD values of kiwifruit leaves [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 168−174.(in Chinese)
[28]	ZHAO Y, YAN C, LU S, et al. Estimation of chlorophyll content in intertidal mangrove leaves with different thicknesses using hyperspectral data [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 106(3): 105511.
[29]	韩浩坤, 妙佳源, 张钰玉, 等. 基于高光谱反射率的糜子冠层叶片叶绿素含量估算 [J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1):164−170. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.01.25 HAN H K, MIAO J Y, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Estimating chlorophyll content of proso millet canopy by hyperspectral reflectance [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1): 164−170.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.01.25
[30]	李媛媛, 常庆瑞, 刘秀英, 等. 基于高光谱和 BP 神经网络的玉米叶片 SPAD 值遥感估算 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(16):135−142. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.16.019 LI Y Y, CHANG Q R, LIU X Y, et al. Estimation of maize leaf SPAD value based on hyperspectrum and BP neural network [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(16): 135−142.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.16.019
[31]	陈志强, 王磊, 白由路, 等. 整个生育期玉米叶片 SPAD 高光谱预测模型研究 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(10):2838−2842. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)10-2838-05 CHEN Z Q, WANG L, BAI Y L, et al. Hyperspectral prediction model for maize leaf SPAD in the whole growth period [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(10): 2838−2842.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)10-2838-05
[32]	潘蓓, 赵庚星, 朱西存, 等. 利用高光谱植被指数估测苹果树冠层叶绿素含量 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(8):2203−2206. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)08-2203-04 PAN B, ZHAO G X, ZHU X C, et al. Estimation of chlorophyll content in apple tree canopy based on hyperspectral parameters [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(8): 2203−2206.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)08-2203-04
[33]	房贤一, 朱西存, 王凌, 等. 基于高光谱的苹果盛果期冠层叶绿素含量监测研究 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(16):3504−3513. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.16.022 FANG X Y, ZHU X C, WANG L, et al. Hyperspectral monitoring of the canopy chlorophyll content at apple tree prosperous fruit stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(16): 3504−3513.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.16.022
[34]	PENG Y, ZHANG M, XU Z, et al. Estimation of leaf nutrition status in degraded vegetation based on ﬁeld survey and hyperspectral data [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 1−12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56847-4
[35]	茹克亚·萨吾提, 阿不都艾尼·阿不里, 尼加提·卡斯木, 等. 基于分数阶微分的春小麦叶绿素含量高光谱估算 [J]. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(6):738−746. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2019.06.15 RUKEYA S, ABUAINI A, NIJATI K, et al. Spectral estimation of chlorophyll content in spring wheat leaves based on fractional differential [J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2019, 39(6): 738−746.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2019.06.15
[36]	颜丙囤, 隋学艳, 王猛, 等. 拔节期淹水玉米冠层光谱变化特征分析 [J]. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(5):28−30. YAN B D, SUI X Y, WANG M, et al. Character analysis of canopy spectral changes of corn at jointing stage under waterlogging stress [J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 48(5): 28−30.(in Chinese)
[37]	王烁, 常庆瑞, 刘梦云, 等. 基于高光谱遥感的棉花叶片叶绿素含量估算 [J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(4):16−27. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2017.04.03 WANG S, CHANG Q R, LIU M Y, et al. Estimation on chlorophyll content of cotton based on optimized spectral index [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(4): 16−27.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2017.04.03
[38]	纪童, 王波, 杨军银, 等. 基于高光谱的草坪草叶绿素含量模拟估算 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2020, 40(8):2571−2577. JI T, WANG B, YANG J Y, et al. Hyperspectral-based estimation on the chlorophyll content of turfgrass [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2020, 40(8): 2571−2577.(in Chinese)