杜鹃花开放式组织培养体系的建立及其遗传稳定性分析

刘雨轩; 胡宗琪; 汪雪蓉; 李冬花; 王泓钦; 赖恭梯; 甘代奎; 赖呈纯; 陈桂信

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.003.009

杜鹃花开放式组织培养体系的建立及其遗传稳定性分析

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.003.009

刘雨轩^{1, 2,},
胡宗琪¹,
汪雪蓉¹,
李冬花¹,
王泓钦¹,
赖恭梯²,
甘代奎³,
赖呈纯^2, ,,
陈桂信^1, ,

1.
福建农林大学园艺学院，福建　福州　350002
2.
福建省农业科学研究院农业工程技术研究所，福建　福州　350003
3.
屏南县林业局，福建　宁德　352300

基金项目: 福建省林业科技项目（闽林科便函[2018]26号）

详细信息

作者简介:
刘雨轩（1997-），女，硕士研究生，研究方向：园艺植物遗传育种（Email：lyxuan23@163.com）

通讯作者:
赖呈纯（1975−），男，博士，副研究员，研究方向：园艺植物生物技术与食品生物技术（Email：lccisland@ 163.com）

陈桂信（1967−），男，博士，副教授，研究方向：园艺植物遗传育种与生物技术研究（Email：guixinchen@163.com）

中图分类号: S 685.21
计量
- 文章访问数: 306
- HTML全文浏览量: 84
- PDF下载量: 23
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2021-09-01
- 修回日期: 2021-10-27
- 刊出日期: 2022-03-31

A Preliminary Study on Open Tissue Culture and Genetic Stability of Rhododendron Plantlets

1.
College of Horticulture , Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian　350002, China
2.
Institute of Agricultural Engineering and Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350003, China
3.
Pingnan County Forestry Bureau, Ningde, Fujian　352300, China

摘要

摘要: 目的通过向培养基中添加不同种类的抑菌剂，建立锦绣杜鹃开放式组织培养，并以开放式组织培养初代和增殖阶段培育的试管芽苗为材料，探究开放式组织培养体系的遗传稳定性，以期为将来杜鹃花的工厂化育苗提供技术支持。方法以锦绣杜鹃当年生枝条的顶芽和带腋芽茎段为试验材料，对外植体的消毒方式以及开放式组织培养初代与增殖培养的阶段培养基抑菌剂的使用浓度进行探索，利用ISSR分子标记技术，检测各时期不同处理的试管芽苗与母本材料间的遗传稳定性。结果外植体材料的适宜消毒方式为10% H₂O₂消毒10～15 min，顶芽存活率61.67%，污染率33.33%，茎段存活率23.33%，污染率68.33%；开放式组织培养阶段，NaClO适宜作为抑菌剂，最适添加量为0.01%，材料存活率62.22%，此时新生叶片细长，数量多，增殖系数为3.067。ISSR分子标记分析表明，不同消毒方式处理的外植体材料、开放式组织培养的各试管芽苗材料以及母本材料间的遗传相似系数均为0.919～0.995，材料间的变异率低，遗传稳定性较好。结论初步探索了开放式组织培养用于杜鹃花组织培养工厂化育苗，锦绣杜鹃外植体的适宜消毒方式为10% H₂O₂消毒10～15 min，顶芽材料的存活率比带腋芽茎段材料高；在开放式组织培养的初代培养和增殖培养阶段，适宜添加0.01% NaClO作为培养基抑菌剂；外植体的不同消毒处理与开放式组织培养，对试管材料遗传稳定性的影响不大。
- 锦绣杜鹃 /
- 开放式组织培养 /
- 试管芽苗 /
- 遗传稳定性 /
- ISSR分子标记
Abstract: Objective An open tissue culture with added bacteriostatic agents in medium for disinfection and disease prevention was established and genetic stability of the plantlets verified for the development of commercialized propagation of rhododendron. Method Terminal buds and stem segments with attached axillary buds were cut from current year branches of Rhododendron pulchrum Sweet plants. Methods using bacteriostatic agents in varied concentrations to disinfect the cut tissues and prevent infection during proliferation stages in an open tissue culture were evaluated. Genetic of the materials in transition from parent to plantlet was scrutinized using an ISSR molecular marker technology to ensure a reliable stability in the process. Result The explants could be adequately disinfected with 10% H₂O₂ for 10 to 15m. A survival rate of terminal buds at 61.67% with a contamination rate of 33.33% and that of stem segments at 23.33% with a contamination rate of 68.33% were achieved. For the open tissue culture, 0.01% addition of NaClO in the medium was found sufficient to achieve the bacteriostatic effect with a survival rate of 62.22% on the plantlets, which had abundant, slender, new leaves and a proliferation coefficient of 3.067. The ISSR molecular maker analysis showed high genetic similarity coefficients ranging from 0.919 to 0.995 between the disinfected explants, the test-tube buds, and the exophyte plantlets. Conclusion This study preliminarily explored the open tissue culture for the feasibility of rhododedron tissue factory nursery. The cut rhododendron tissues for the culture was satisfactorily disinfected with 10% H₂O₂ in 10-15 m. The survival rate of terminal buds after the treatment was higher than that of stem segments. In the early stage of the open tissue culture, a 0.01% addition of NaClO in medium provided sufficient bacteriostatic effect without significant reduction on the survival rate and proliferation coefficient of the treated plantlets. The genetic distance between the parent and the explants remained close, indicating little variation introduced by the propagating operation. The disinfection method and culture procedure appeared feasible for the development of rhododendron seedling generation at nurseries.
- Rhododendron pulchrum Sweet /
- open tissue culture /
- test-tube seeding /
- genetic stability /
- ISSR molecular marker

HTML全文

图 1 不同消毒处理对顶芽材料的影响

注：柱形图上方的不同小写字母表示不同处理组内差异显著测验（P＜0.05），小写字母的不同下标表示不同处理组。图2、3同。

Figure 1. Effects of disinfection treatments on terminal buds

Note: Different lower case letters above the column indicate the significant differences in Duncan’s new Multiple-Range test in different processing groups, p＜0.05, different subscripts of lowercase letters indicate different processing groups. The same as Fig2-3.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 不同消毒处理对带腋芽茎段材料的影响

Figure 2. Effects of disinfection treatments on stem segments with axillary buds

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同抑菌剂对材料生长的影响

注：1：CK；2：0.3% S106；3：0.01% NaClO；4：0.015% NaClO；5：0.02% NaClO；6：25 mg·L⁻¹ 代森锰锌；7：50 mg·L⁻¹ 代森锰锌；8：75 mg·L⁻¹ 代森锰锌；9：100 mg·L⁻¹ 代森锰锌。

Figure 3. Effect of antibacterial agents on growth of cut plant tissues

1: CK; 2: 0.3% S106; 3: 0.01% NaClO; 4: 0.015% NaClO; 5: 0.02% NaClO; 6: 25 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb; 7: 50 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb; 8: 75 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb; 9: 100 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 抑菌剂对材料生长的影响

注：A：CK中生长的材料；B：0.3% S106 中生长的材料；C：0.01% NaClO中生长的材料。

Figure 4. Effect of bacteriostatic agent on growth of cut plant tissues

Note: A: material grown in CK; B: material grown in 0.3% S106; C: material grown in 0.01% NaClO.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 引物UBC 845电泳结果

注：1~30：锦绣杜鹃样品（顺序同表1）；M：2 000 bp marker

Figure 5. Electrophoretic map of UBC primer 845

Note：1~30: sample of R. pulchrum (in same order as shown in Table 1)；M：2 000 bp marker.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 外植体消毒材料的聚类分析

Figure 6. Cluster analysis on bacteriostatic agents

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 开放式培养体系的聚类分析

Figure 7. Cluster analysis on open tissue culture

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 遗传稳定性分析材料

Table 1. Materials subjected to genetic stability analysis

编号 Number	样品标签 Sample lable	样品来源及处理方式 Source and treatment method of sample	编号 Number	样品标签 Sample lable	样品来源及处理方式 Source and treatment method of sample
1	母本 Mother plant	锦绣杜鹃取样母株嫩芽，未处理 Buds of Rhododendron pulchrum Sweet., Untreated	16	CL7	材料使用400 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂ 消毒10 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 400 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 10 min, Incipience media
2	SY1	材料使用10% H₂O₂消毒 5 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 10% H₂O₂ solution for 5 min, Incipience media	17	CL8	材料使用400 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 20 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 400 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 20 min, Incipience media
3	SY2	材料使用10% H₂O₂消毒 10 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 10% H₂O₂ solution for 10 min, Incipience media	18	CL9	材料使用400 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 30 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 400 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 30 min, Incipience media
4	SY3	材料使用10% H₂O₂消毒 15 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 10% H₂O₂ solution for 15 min, Incipience media	19	OPC1	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 100 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open primary culture, Incipience media + 100 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb
5	SY4	材料使用12% H₂O₂消毒 5 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 12% H₂O₂ solution for 5 min, Incipience media	20	OPC2	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 75 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open primary culture, Incipience media + 75 mg·L⁻¹mancozeb
6	SY5	材料使用12% H₂O₂消毒 10 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 12% H₂O₂ solution for 10 min, Incipience media	21	OPC3	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 50 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open primary culture, Incipience media + 50 mg·L⁻¹mancozeb
7	SY6	材料使用12% H₂O₂消毒 15 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 12% H₂O₂ solution for 15 min, Incipience media	22	OPC4	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 25 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open primary culture, Incipience media + 25 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb
8	CN1	材料使用2% NaClO消毒 20 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 2% NaClO solution for 20 min,	23	OPC5	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 0.01% NaClO Open primary culture, Incipience media + 0.01% NaClO
9	CN2	材料使用2% NaClO消毒 30 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 2% NaClO solution for 30 min,	24	OPC6	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 0.015% NaClO Open primary culture, Incipience media + 0.015% NaClO
10	CL1	材料使用200 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 10 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 200 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 10 min, Incipience media	25	OPC7	开放式初代培养，初代培养基 + 0.02% NaClO Open primary culture, Incipience media + 0.02% NaClO
11	CL2	材料使用200 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂消毒 20 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 200 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 20 min, Incipience media	26	OZZ1	开放式增殖培养，增殖培养基 + 0.01% NaClO Open proliferation culture, Proliferation medium + 0.01% NaClO
12	CL3	材料使用200 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 30 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 200 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 30 min, Incipience media	27	OZZ2	开放式增殖培养，增殖培养基 + 0.015% NaClO Open proliferation culture, Proliferation medium + 0.015% NaClO
13	CL4	材料使用300 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 10 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 300 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 10 min, Incipience media	28	OZZ3	开放式增殖培养，增殖培养基 + 0.02% NaClO Open proliferation culture, Proliferation medium + 0.02% NaClO
14	CL5	材料使用300 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 20 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 300 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 20 min, Incipience media	29	OZZ4	开放式增殖培养，增殖培养基 + 100 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open proliferation culture, Proliferation medium + 100 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb
15	CL6	材料使用300 mg·L⁻¹ ClO₂消毒 30 min，初代培养基 Material disinfected by 300 mg·L⁻¹ClO₂ solution for 30 min, Incipience media	30	OZZ5	开放式增殖培养，增殖培养基 + 75 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 Open proliferation culture, Proliferation medium + 75 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同ZT含量对材料增殖系数的影响

Table 2. Effects of ZT content on proliferation coefficient of materials

材料 Materials	ZT含量 Content of ZT/(mg·L⁻¹)	增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient
材料 Materials	ZT含量 Content of ZT/(mg·L⁻¹)	10 d	20 d	30 d
带腋芽茎段 Stem segment with axillary bud	0	1.250	1.750	1.750
	1.5	1.400	1.643	2.000
	2.0	1.000	2.222	2.389
	2.5	1.000	2.313	2.500
	3.0	1.385	2.333	2.944
顶芽 Terminal bud material	0	1.000	1.000	1.000
	1.5	1.000	1.000	1.000
	2.0	1.000	1.000	1.000
	2.5	1.000	1.000	1.000
	3.0	1.000	1.000	1.000

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 开放式增殖培养对材料的影响

Table 3. Effect of open tissue culture on materials

材料 Materials	抑菌剂含量 Content of bacteriostatic agent	增殖系数 Multiplication coefficient
材料 Materials	抑菌剂含量 Content of bacteriostatic agent	10 d	20 d	30 d
带腋芽茎段 Stem segment with axillary bud	0.01% NaClO	1.667	1.815	3.067
	0.015% NaClO	1.364	1.636	1.333
	0.02% NaClO	1.333	1.333	1.000
	100 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 100 m·L⁻¹ mancozeb	1.667	1.815	2.667
	75 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 75 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb	1.167	2.000	2.526
顶芽 Terminal bud material	0.01% NaClO	1.000	1.000	1.000
	0.015% NaClO	1.000	1.000	1.000
	0.02% NaClO	1.000	1.000	1.000
	100 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 100 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb	1.000	1.000	1.000
	75 mg·L⁻¹代森锰锌 75 mg·L⁻¹ mancozeb	1.000	1.000	1.000

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 13条ISSR引物的碱基序列扩增

Table 4. Base sequence amplification of 13 ISSR primers

编号 Serial name	引物序列 Primer sequence	扩增总带数 Amplified bands/条	多态性带数 Polymorphic bands/条	多态性位点百分率 Percentage of polymoephic/%
UBC 810	（GA）₈T	7	2	28.57
UBC 811	（GA）₈C	10	0	0.00
UBC 815	（CT）₈G	8	1	12.50
UBC 816	（CA）₈T	10	4	40.00
UBC 823	（TC）₈C	8	1	12.50
UBC 826	（AC）₈C	9	0	0.00
UBC 827	（AC）₈G	6	2	33.33
UBC 834	（AG）₈YT	9	2	22.22
UBC 835	（AG）₈YC	9	3	33.33
UBC 840	（GA）₈YT	8	3	37.50
UBC 845	（CT）₈RG	10	8	80.00
UBC 847	（CA）₈RC	7	1	14.29
UBC 857	（AC）₈YG	9	2	22.22
总计 Total	−	110	29	−
平均 Average	−	8.46	2.23	26.36

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(24)

[1]	谢兰曼, 许彩芬. 浅析杜鹃在苏州园林绿地中的应用 [J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(19):118−119. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4958.2020.19.053 XIE L M, XU C F. Analysis on the application of rhododendron in Suzhou garden green space [J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2020, 43(19): 118−119.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4958.2020.19.053
[2]	李少泓, 孙欣. 杜鹃属植物的化学成分及药理作用研究进展 [J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2010, 28(11):2435−2437. LI S H, SUN X. The research progress in the chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Rhododendron [J]. Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2010, 28(11): 2435−2437.(in Chinese)
[3]	孔鑫, 王剑峰, 熊涵, 等. 杜鹃属植物育种、繁殖及逆境胁迫的研究进展[J/OL]. 分子植物育种: [2021-03-18]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210317.1702.010.html.(in Chinese) KONG X, WANG J F, XIONG H, et al. Research Progress on Breeding, Reproductin and Adversity Stress of Rhododendron[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding: : [2021-03-18]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20210317.1702.010.html.
[4]	MARTIN M, MEYER J R. In Vitro Propagation of Rhododendron catawbiense from Flower Buds[J]. Hortscience, 17(6): 891-892.
[5]	董春枝, 郑开文, 潘季淑. 三种杜鹃花组培快速繁殖初步研究 [J]. 北京农业大学学报, 1989(2):164−166. DONG C Z, ZHENG K W, PAN J S. Preliminary studies on tissue culture and rapid propagation of three species of Rhododendron [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 1989(2): 164−166.(in Chinese)
[6]	胡计红, 陈桂信, 杨惠婷, 等. 屏南龙源‘四季杜鹃’古树组培快繁技术研究 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(4):755−763. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.017 HU J H, CHEN G X, YANG H T, et al. Technology for rapid propagation in vitro of ancient four-season Rhododendron tree in Longyuan of Pingnan [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 755−763.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.017
[7]	崔刚, 单文修, 秦旭, 等. 植物开放式组织培养研究初探 [J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 35(4):529−533. CUI G, SHAN W X, QIN X, et al. The preliminary study on plant open-tissue-culture [J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 2004, 35(4): 529−533.(in Chinese)
[8]	LU J J, ALI A, HE E Q, et al. Establishment of an open, sugar-free tissue culture system for sugarcane micropropagation [J]. Sugar Tech, 2020, 22(1): 8−14. doi: 10.1007/s12355-019-00758-1
[9]	解辉, 莫廷辉, 曾丽星. 次氯酸钠在香蕉开放式组织培养中的应用研究 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2011, 32(5):886−890. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.05.020 XIE H, MO Y H, ZENG L X. Application of sodium hypochlorite in the open tissue culture of banana [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2011, 32(5): 886−890.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2011.05.020
[10]	黄敏, 梁春辉, 李秀平, 等. 两种抑菌剂在铁皮石斛开放式组织培养的应用 [J]. 北方园艺, 2018(12):136−140. HUANG M, LIANG C H, LI X P, et al. Application of two bacteriostatic agents in open tissue culture of Dendrobium officinale [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2018(12): 136−140.(in Chinese)
[11]	崔刚, 单文修, 秦旭, 等. 葡萄开放式组织培养外植体系的建立 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2004, 20(6):36−38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2004.06.013 CUI G, SHAN W X, QIN X, et al. Establishment of grape explant in open tissue culture [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2004, 20(6): 36−38.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2004.06.013
[12]	康俊. 真菌抑菌剂在马铃薯开放式组织培养中的应用 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(26):108−110,121. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.26.038 KANG J. Application of fungal bacteriostat in open tissue culture of potato [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(26): 108−110,121.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2016.26.038
[13]	王丹, 刘霞. 山梨酸钾在红豆杉开放式组织培养中的应用 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(2):634−635. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.02.030 WANG D, LIU X. Application of potassium sorbate in the open tissue culture of Taxus chinensis [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(2): 634−635.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.02.030
[14]	朱梦珠, 杨惠婷, 胡计红, 等. 切花菊‘白扇’开放式组培快繁体系的建立 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(8):1551−1558. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.08.014 ZHU M Z, YANG H T, HU J H, et al. An open in vitro culture system for rapid propagation of cut flower Chrysanthemum cv iwanohakusen [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(8): 1551−1558.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.08.014
[15]	孔刚. 福建杜鹃花遗传多样性ISSR分析及其离体保存[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2011. KONG G. ISSR analysis of genetic diversity and in-vitro conservation of Rhododendron germplasm resources in fujian[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2011. (in Chinese)
[16]	张艳红, 沈向群, 赵凤军, 等. 红枫杜鹃组织培养技术体系的构建 [J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2009, 40(1):25−29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2009.01.006 ZHANG Y H, SHEN X Q, ZHAO F J, et al. Technique system of tissue culture in rododendron ‘hongfeng' [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2009, 40(1): 25−29.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2009.01.006
[17]	CLARKSON T W, MAGOS L. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds [J]. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 2006, 36(8): 609−662. doi: 10.1080/10408440600845619
[18]	WEI X Y, CHEN J J, ZHANG C Y, et al. In vitro shoot culture of Rhododendron fortunei: An important plant for bioactive phytochemicals [J]. Industrial Crops and Products, 2018, 126: 459−465. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.037
[19]	梁钾贤, 揭进, 刘伟清. 二氧化氯对剑麻外植体材料消毒的应用研究 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2012, 33(10):1819−1823. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.10.019 LIANG J X, JIE J, LIU W Q. Disinfection of agavee sisalana explant materials with chlorine dioxide [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(10): 1819−1823.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.10.019
[20]	梁钾贤, 陈彪. 二氧化氯在香蕉外植体建立中的应用 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2009, 38(4):41−42. LIANG J X, CHEN B. Application of chlorine dioxide in the establishment of banana explants [J]. South China Fruits, 2009, 38(4): 41−42.(in Chinese)
[21]	DOUGLAS G C. Propagation of eight cultiv ars of Rhododendron in vitro using agar-solidified and liquid media and direct rooting of shoots in vivo [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1984, 24(3/4): 337−347.
[22]	胡计红. 屏南四季开花杜鹃古树组培快繁体系的建立与优化[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2019. HU J H. Development and optimization for rapid propagation in vitro of flowering season Rhododendron ancient trees from pingnan[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. (in Chinese)
[23]	DUAN Y B, ZHAO F L, LI H, et al. Evaluation of aqueous chlorine dioxide for disinfecting plant explants [J]. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2016, 52(1): 38−44.
[24]	程维舜, 黄翔, 陈钢, 等. 锌缺乏和过量对藜麦幼苗生长及光合作用的影响 [J]. 湖南农业科学, 2020(11):21−23. CHENG W S, HUANG X, CHEN G, et al. Effects of zinc deficiency and excess on the growth and photosynthesis of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seedlings [J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2020(11): 21−23.(in Chinese)