植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯生长发育、光合特性及产量的影响

吴雁斌; 吕和平; 高彦萍; 梁宏杰; 罗爱花; 张武

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.005.004

植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯生长发育、光合特性及产量的影响

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.005.004

甘肃省农业科学院马铃薯研究所/甘肃省马铃薯脱毒种薯（种苗）病毒检测及安全性评价工程中心，甘肃　兰州　730070

基金项目: 甘肃省农业科学院科技成果转化项目（2021GAAS-CGZH03）；甘肃省现代农业科技支撑体系区域创新中心重点科技项目（2021GAAS52）；甘肃省农业科学院重点研发项目（2021GAAS28、2022GAAS30）

详细信息

作者简介:
吴雁斌（1982−），男，助理研究员，硕士，主要从事马铃薯育种及良种繁育研究工作（E-mail：79619698@qq.com）

通讯作者:
张武（1966−），男，研究员，主要从事马铃薯良种繁育研究工作（E-mail：842487867 @qq.com）

中图分类号: S 532
计量
- 文章访问数: 502
- HTML全文浏览量: 128
- PDF下载量: 31
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-01-17
- 录用日期: 2022-01-17
- 修回日期: 2022-03-20
- 网络出版日期: 2022-05-21
- 刊出日期: 2022-05-28

Effects of Treating Seeds with Growth Regulator on Growth, Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Potato Plants

Potato Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Gansu Potato Seed (Seedling) Virus Detection and Safety Evaluation of Engineering Technology Research Center, Lanzhou, Gansu　730070, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究不同生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯种薯生长发育、光合特性及产量的影响，筛选适合生产小型种薯的生长调节剂。方法以马铃薯红美原种为供试材料，采用随机区组设计，利用不同含量的5%氨基寡糖素、甲壳寡糖素、寡聚酸碘、6-BA，复配6种生长调节剂（D1~D6），清水为对照（CK），研究生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯植株生长、光合及产量的影响。结果 D2（10 mL·L⁻¹ 5%氨基寡糖素+2.5 mg·L⁻¹6-BA+7.5 mL·L⁻¹寡聚酸碘）、D5（5 mL·L⁻¹甲壳寡糖素+2.5 mg·L⁻¹ 6-BA+7.5 mL·L⁻¹寡聚酸碘）处理出苗期较其他处理提前2 d，盛花期也较CK处理提前5 d和4 d。D3（10 mL·L⁻¹ 5%氨基寡糖素+2.5 mg·L⁻¹ 6-BA）和D4（5 mL·L⁻¹甲壳寡糖素+7.5 mL·L⁻¹寡聚酸碘）株高较CK分别提高12 cm和9 cm。D2处理茎粗最大，主茎数最少，茎粗生长速率最大，较CK高79.16%。D3处理茎粗最小，主茎数最多；D2处理马铃薯叶片净光合速率最大，显著高于对照，较对照增加53.86%。D2处理胞间CO₂浓度、气孔导度与D5处理无差异，显著高于其他处理。D2处理显著提高了≤50 g块茎比率，而D5处理显著提高了＞50 g块茎比率。D2处理单株结薯数最高，产量35335.94 kg·hm⁻²；D5处理单株薯重最高，产量30572.42 kg·hm⁻²。结论 D2处理拌种处理能够提高马铃薯茎粗、叶绿素含量、光合速率和单株薯重，进而提高马铃薯小薯率和产量，适用于马铃薯机械化种植中原种生产；D5处理可提高单株薯重、大薯数量及产量，提高马铃薯商品薯产量。
- 马铃薯 /
- 生长调节剂 /
- 光合作用 /
- 产量
Abstract: Objective Effects of seed treatment with growth regulators on the growth and yield of potato plants were studied to select the suitable regulators for small potato. Method Using randomized block design, seeds of Hongmei potatoes were treated with 6 formulated growth regulating solutions (D1—D6) or water as control (CK). The solutions contained 5% amino-oligosaccharides (AO), chitosan oligosaccharide (CO), iodine oligosaccharide acids (IOA), and/or 6-BA in varied concentrations. After treatment, the seed germination as well as the plant growth, development, photosynthesis, and yield were determined for an analysis. Result The seeds treated with D2 (10 mL·L⁻¹ AO + 2.5 mg·L⁻¹ 6-BA+7.5 mL·L⁻¹ IOA) or D5 (5 mL·L⁻¹ CO + 2.5 mg·L⁻¹ 6-BA+7.5 mL·L⁻¹ IOA) germinated 2 d earlier than the others. The flowering stage of the plants began 5 d earlier with D2 and 4 d earlier with D5 than with CK. Treatment D3 (10 mL·L⁻¹ AO + 2.5 mg·L⁻¹ 6-BA) or D4 (5 mL·L⁻¹ CO+7.5 mL·L⁻¹ IOA) increased the plant height by 12 cm and 9 cm, respectively, over those of CK. Among all treatments, D2 produced the least number of main stems but the largest stem girth and the greatest growth rate that was 79.16% higher than CK; whereas D3 the smallest stem girth and the largest number of main stems. The plant photosynthetic rate was significantly enhanced by D2 with a 53.86% increase over CK. The CO₂ concentration and stomatal conductance of D2- and D5-treated plants were not significantly different but significantly higher than the others. On tuber productivity, D2 significantly increased the proportion of tuber weighed ≤50 g, while D5 significantly raised that of＞50 g. D2 gave the highest number of tubers per plant with a yield of 35 335.94 kg·hm⁻², whereas D5 the greatest weight of tubers per plant with a yield of 30572.42 kg·hm⁻². Conclusion It appeared that the seeds treated by D2 could increase the stem girth, chlorophyll content, photosynthetic rate, and tuber weight per plant of the potato plants. As a result, the plant yield and small tuber rate were increased making it desirable for mechanized cultivation. On the other hand, the seed treatment of D5 boosted the tuber weight per plant and the number and yield of large-sized tubers.
- Potato /
- growth regulator /
- photosynthesis /
- yield

HTML全文

图 1 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯株高、茎粗生长速率的影响

图中小写字母表示差异显著（P＜0.05），下图同。

Figure 1. Effects of seed treatments with growth regulators on height and stem girth growth rate of potato plants

Data with lowercase letters on same column indicate significant differences at P＜0.05. Same for figures below.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯叶绿素含量的影响

Figure 2. Effects of seed treatments with growth regulators on potato plant chlorophyll content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 试验设计

Table 1. Experimental design

处理Treat- ment	生长调节剂 Growth regulator
处理Treat- ment	5%氨基寡糖素Amino- oligosaccharides/ （mL·L⁻¹）	甲壳寡糖素Chitosan- oligosaccharide/ （mL·L⁻¹）	6-BA/ （mg·L⁻¹）	寡聚酸碘 Iodine Oligosaccharide Acids/ （mL·L⁻¹）
D1	10.0	0.0	0.0	7.5
D2	10.0	0.0	2.5	7.5
D3	10.0	0.0	2.5	0.0
D4	0.0	5.0	0.0	7.5
D5	0.0	5.0	2.5	7.5
D6	0.0	5.0	2.5	0.0
CK	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯生育期的影响

Table 2. Effects of seed treatments with growth regulators on potato growth period

处理 Treatment	播种期 Sowing/ （月−日）	出苗期 Emergence/ （月−日）	盛花期 Flowering/ （月−日）	成熟期 Maturity/ （月−日）	生育期 Growth stage/d
D1	04−25	05−30	07−12	09−30	120
D2	04−25	05−28	07−10	09−25	117
D3	04−25	05−30	07−12	09−30	120
D4	04−25	05−30	07−12	09−30	120
D5	04−25	05−28	07−12	09−26	118
D6	04−25	05−30	07−11	09−30	120
CK	04−25	06−01	07−15	10−02	121

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯生长指标的影响

Table 3. Effects of seed treatments with growth regulators on potato plant growth

处理 Treatment	株高Plant height/cm	茎粗Stem thick/mm	主茎数 Mainstem number	分枝数 Branches
D1	50.00±2.01 b	12.49±0.41 b	2.2±0.01 b	2.4±0.01 b
D2	52.00±2.33 b	15.08±0.16 a	2.0±0.02 b	2.8±0.02 ab
D3	56.67±0.88 a	10.31±0.02 c	2.9±0.03 a	3.8±0.03 a
D4	53.67±0.66 ab	10.58±0.02 c	2.7±0.01 a	3.5±0.02 a
D5	52.67±2.08 b	11.82±0.07 bc	2.4±0.01 ab	2.9±0.03 ab
D6	51.00±1.15 bc	11.94±0.04 bc	2.5±0.04 ab	2.6±0.02 ab
CK	44.67±0.88 c	9.51±0.50 d	1.8±0.02 c	2.0±0.01 c
表中同列数值小写字母表示差异显著（P＜0.05），下表同。
Data with lowercase letters on same column indicate significant differences at P＜0.05. Same for tables below.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯光合作用的影响

Table 4. Effects of seed treatments with regulators on photosynthesis of potato plants

处理 Treat- ment	净光合速率 P_n/ (μmol·m⁻² ·s⁻¹)	胞间CO₂浓度 C_i/ （μmol·mol⁻¹)	气孔导度 G_s / （mol·m⁻²·s⁻¹)	蒸腾速率 T_r / （mmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹)
D1	19.02±2.00 b	262.25±11.35 b	0.66±0.11 b	6.02±0.52 c
D2	24.12±1.52 a	282.87±12.58 a	0.72±0.14 a	6.32±0.39 bc
D3	18.26±1.11 b	260.56±13.34 b	0.65±0.11b	6.27±0.31bc
D4	17.22±1.54 bc	258.33±12.78 b	0.58±0.05 b	6.43±0.42 bc
D5	23.64±1.22 a	277.59±11.02 ab	0.69±0.05 ab	6.74±0.12 b
D6	20.39±1.27 b	259.22±14.55 b	0.57±0.10 b	6.41±0.51 bc
CK	15.68±0.91 c	219.25±12.21 c	0.25±0.01 d	8.18±0.33 a

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯块茎分布的影响

Table 5. Effects of seed treatments with regulators on tuber count and size of potato plants　　　　（单位：%）

处理 Treatment	大薯率＞50 g Large potato rate＞50 g	小薯率≤50 g Small potato rate≤50 g
D1	73.89	20.11
D2	67.55	32.45
D3	74.50	17.72
D4	77.41	19.83
D5	80.17	22.16
D6	73.87	22.13
CK	72.41	25.5

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 植物生长调节剂拌种对马铃薯产量的影响

Table 6. Effects of seed treatments with growth regulators on tuber yield of potato plants

处理 Treatment	单株结薯数 Tuber number per plant	单株薯重 Weight per tuber/kg	产量 Yield/（kg·hm⁻²）
D1	6.77±0.22 b	0.54±0.05 bc	27497.81±99.56 bc
D2	7.91±0.62 a	0.66±0.03 b	35335.94±142.89 a
D3	6.95±0.05 b	0.68±0.04 b	26012.81±89.56 bc
D4	5.98±0.52 bc	0.58±0.02 bc	28331.72±132.56 b
D5	7.09±0.05 b	0.75±0.03 a	30572.42±112.32 b
D6	6.36±0.30 b	0.52±0.06 bc	29773.74±108.46 b
CK	5.63±0.05 c	0.47±0.02 c	24758.97±105.23 c

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(31)

[1]	杨帅, 闵凡祥, 高云飞, 等. 新世纪中国马铃薯产业发展现状及存在问题 [J]. 中国马铃薯, 2014, 28(5):311−316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2014.05.012 YANG S, MIN F X, GAO Y F, et al. Status quo and challenges of China potato industry of the 21st century [J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2014, 28(5): 311−316.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2014.05.012
[2]	高彦萍, 吕和平, 张武, 等. 马铃薯卷叶病毒RT-LAMP检测方法的建立 [J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(9):1943−1950. doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.09.1943 GAO Y P, LYU H P, ZHANG W, et al. Establishment of the detection method for potato leafroll virus by RT-LAMP [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(9): 1943−1950.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.09.1943
[3]	曹志强. 定西市马铃薯产业发展优势、问题及对策分析 [J]. 中国马铃薯, 2006, 20(6):374−377. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2006.06.021 CAO Z Q. Analysis of the advantages, problems and countermeasures of potato industry development in Ding xi [J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2006, 20(6): 374−377.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2006.06.021
[4]	赵婧, 赵贵宾, 李星, 等. 甘肃省推进马铃薯主粮化行动的几点思考 [J]. 中国马铃薯, 2015, 29(3):182−185. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2015.03.017 ZHAO J, ZHAO G B, LI X, et al. Some reflections on promotion of potato as a staple food in Gansu Province [J]. Chinese Potato Journal, 2015, 29(3): 182−185.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3635.2015.03.017
[5]	吴正强, 岳云, 赵小文, 等. 甘肃省马铃薯产业发展研究 [J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2008, 29(6):67−72. WU Z Q, YUE Y, ZHAO X W, et al. Studies on potato industry development in Gansu Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2008, 29(6): 67−72.(in Chinese)
[6]	刘晓伟, 何宝林, 康恩祥. 半干旱地区马铃薯覆膜方式的研究 [J]. 作物杂志, 2012(1):115−117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2012.01.030 LIU X W, HE B L, KANG E X. A study on different modes of plastic mulching of potato in the semi-arid area [J]. Crops, 2012(1): 115−117.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2012.01.030
[7]	李霄峰, 鲁喜荣. 叶面喷施植物生长调节剂对马铃薯产量和品质的影响 [J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(22):199−200. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2011.22.127 LI X F, LU X R. The influence on potato's yield and quality by spraying plant growth regulator [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(22): 199−200.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2011.22.127
[8]	王丽颖, 高翀, 高涵妮, 等. 22%丙硫菌唑·寡聚酸碘悬乳剂的高效液相色谱分析 [J]. 农药, 2021, 60(4):267−269. WANG L Y, GAO C, GAO H N, et al. Analysis of prothioconazole·iodine oligosaccharide acids 22% suspension emulsion by HPLC [J]. Agrochemicals, 2021, 60(4): 267−269.(in Chinese)
[9]	项洪涛, 冯延江, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对马铃薯产量和品质的调控研究进展 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(15):15−19. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040108 XIANG H T, FENG Y J, ZHENG D F, et al. Plant growth regulators affecting yield and quality of potato: Research progress [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(15): 15−19.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb17040108
[10]	秦丽, 张月辰. 不同浓度多效唑对大棚马铃薯生长调控的效果 [J]. 贵州农业科学, 2010, 38(4):85−87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2010.04.026 QIN L, ZHANG Y C. Effect of different paclobutrazol concentration on growth of potato planted in greenhouse [J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(4): 85−87.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2010.04.026
[11]	曲亚英, 李掌, 郑永伟, 等. 植物生长调节剂和种植密度对马铃薯‘陇薯7号’生长、产量及不同质量块茎分布的影响 [J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2020, 55(1):72−81. QU Y Y, LI Z, ZHENG Y W, et al. Effects of plant growth regulator and density on growth, yield and distribution of single tuber mass of potato ‘Longshu No.7’ [J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2020, 55(1): 72−81.(in Chinese)
[12]	赵晶晶, 冯乃杰, 郑殿峰, 等. 植物生长调节剂对马铃薯叶片生理代谢及产量品质的影响 [J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(6):154−158,165. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.06.23 ZHAO J J, FENG N J, ZHENG D F, et al. Effects of plant growth regulators on leaf physiology, yield and quality of potato [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(6): 154−158,165.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2017.06.23
[13]	陈晓光, 李洪民, 张爱君, 等. 不同氮水平下多效唑对食用型甘薯光合和淀粉积累的影响 [J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38(9):1728−1733. CHEN X G, LI H M, ZHANG A J, et al. Effect of paclobutrazol under different N-application rates on photosynthesis and starch accumulation in edible sweetpotato [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(9): 1728−1733.(in Chinese)
[14]	禤维言, 张涛, 黄永禄, 等. 喷施多效唑对甜高粱生长及生理特性的影响 [J]. 作物杂志, 2011(5):73−76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2011.05.017 XUAN W Y, ZHANG T, HUANG Y L, et al. Effects of paclobutrazol on development and physiological properties of sweet Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2011(5): 73−76.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2011.05.017
[15]	龙国, 张绍荣. 不同药剂处理对马铃薯生长及产量影响的研究 [J]. 农业科技通讯, 2008(1):51−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2008.01.025 LONG G, ZHANG S R. Analysis of the advantages, problems and countermeasures of potato industry development in Ding xi [J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008(1): 51−53.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2008.01.025
[16]	曹先维, 张新明, 陈洪, 等. 南方冬作区马铃薯产业发展现状和技术特点及需求分析[C]// 马铃薯产业与小康社会建设. 中国作物学会, 2014: 180-188.
[17]	刘喜才, 张丽娟. 马铃薯种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. LIU X C,ZHANG L J. Potato germplasm resource description specifications and data standards[M]. BEI JING,China Agriculture Press, 2006.（in Chinese）
[18]	杨进荣, 王成社, 李景琦, 等. 马铃薯干物质积累及分配规律研究 [J]. 西北农业学报, 2004, 13(3):118−120,134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2004.03.031 YANG J R, WANG C S, LI J Q, et al. Accumulation and distribution of dry matter in potato [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2004, 13(3): 118−120,134.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2004.03.031
[19]	王爱华, 张文芳, 黄冲平. 马铃薯干物质分配与器官建成的动态模拟研究 [J]. 生物数学学报, 2005, 20(3):102−108. WANG A H, ZHANG W F, HUANG C P. Study on the simulation of potato dry-matter distribution and its apparatuses formation [J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 2005, 20(3): 102−108.(in Chinese)
[20]	于品华. 烯效唑对无土栽培马铃薯微型种薯生长及产量影响 [J]. 甘肃农业科技, 1997, 5:10−11. YU P H. Effect of allylizole on the growth and yield of potato miniature seed potatoes in soilless culture [J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Teshnology, 1997, 5: 10−11.(in Chinese)
[21]	PONT LEZICA R F. Evolution des substances de type gibbérellines chez la pomme de Terre pendant la tubérisation, en relation avec la longueur du jour et la température [J]. Potato Research, 1970, 13(4): 323−331. doi: 10.1007/BF02358277
[22]	WOOLLEY D J, WAREING P F. The role of roots, cytokinins and apical dominance in the control of lateral shoot form in Solanum Andigena [J]. Planta, 1972, 105(1): 33−42. doi: 10.1007/BF00385161
[23]	MASSACCI A, NABIEV S M, PIETROSANTI L, et al. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) to the onset of drought stress under field conditions studied by gas-exchange analysis and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging [J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2008, 46(2): 189−195. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.10.006
[24]	宋贺, 蒋延玲, 许振柱, 等. 玉米光合生理参数对全生育期干旱与拔节后干旱过程的响应 [J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(7):2405−2415. SONG H, JIANG Y L, XU Z Z, et al. Response of photosynthetic physiological parameters of maize to drought during the whole growth period and after the jointing stage [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(7): 2405−2415.(in Chinese)
[25]	王惠群, 萧浪涛, 李合松, 等. 矮壮素对马铃薯中薯3号光合特征和磷素营养的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(6):1143−1147. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505x.2007.06.025 WANG H Q, XIAO L T, LI H S, et al. Effects of chlorocholine chloride on photosynthetic characteristics and phosphate nutrition of potato Zhongshu3 [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007, 13(6): 1143−1147.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505x.2007.06.025
[26]	HIRONAKA K, ISHIBASHI K, HAKAMADA K. Effect of static loading on sugar contents and activities of invertase, UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase and sucrose 6-phosphate synthase in potatoes during storage [J]. Potato Research, 2001, 44(1): 33−39. doi: 10.1007/BF02360285
[27]	杨东清, 董文华, 骆永丽, 等. 外源6-BA对两种氮素水平下小麦幼苗叶片光合性能及内源激素含量的影响 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20):3871−388. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.20.004 YANG D Q, DONG W H, LUO Y L, et al. Effects of exogenous 6-BA on photosynthetic characteristics and endogenous hormone content in wheat leaves under two nitrogen application levels at seedling stage [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(20): 3871−388.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.20.004
[28]	谭雪莲, 吕军锋, 郭天文, 等. 旱地地膜覆盖和施肥对马铃薯干物质累积和土壤水分含量的影响 [J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2011, 30(2):104−106,126. TAN X L, LV J F, GUO T W, et al. Effects of plastic film mulching and fertilization on potato dry matter accumulation and soil water content in dryland [J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2011, 30(2): 104−106,126.(in Chinese)
[29]	白宝璋. 马铃薯块茎形成与光周期和植物激素关系的研究进展 [J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 1986, 8(2):6−9,14. BAI B Z. Advances in the study on potato tuberization affected by photoperiod and photohormone [J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1986, 8(2): 6−9,14.(in Chinese)
[30]	宋占午. 细胞分裂素对马铃薯块茎形成的影响 [J]. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 1992, 28(1):55−61. SONG Z W. Effects of cytokinins on tuberization of potato plant [J]. Journal of Northwest Normal University, 1992, 28(1): 55−61.(in Chinese)
[31]	齐德强, 赵晶晶, 冯乃杰, 等. 烯效唑(S3307)和胺鲜酯(DTA-6)对马铃薯叶与块茎糖代谢及产量的影响 [J]. 作物杂志, 2019(4):148−153. QI D Q, ZHAO J J, FENG N J, et al. Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on sugar metabolism and yield of potato leaves and tubers [J]. Crops, 2019(4): 148−153.(in Chinese)