单季稻红萍绿肥还田的节肥增产效应

邓素芳; 詹杰; 杨燕秋; 郑慧芬; 应朝阳

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.007.017

单季稻红萍绿肥还田的节肥增产效应

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.007.017

邓素芳^{1, 2,},
詹杰^{1, 2},
杨燕秋^{1, 2},
郑慧芬^{1, 2},
应朝阳^{1, 2, ,}

1.
福建省农业科学院农业生态研究所，福建　福州 350013
2.
国家红萍资源中心，福建　福州 350013

基金项目: 福建省农业科学院对外合作项目（DWHZ2021-08）；福建省自然科学基金项目（2021J01469）；国家绿肥产业技术体系建设专项（CARS-22）；福建省农业种质资源创新专项（ZZZYCXZX202206）

详细信息

作者简介:
邓素芳（1982−），女，博士，助理研究员，研究方向：植物资源评价与利用（E-mail：d.sufang@163.com）

通讯作者:
应朝阳（1969−），男，研究员，研究方向：植物种质资源保护与利用（E-mail：eagleying@21cn.com）

中图分类号: S 142.5
计量
- 文章访问数: 342
- HTML全文浏览量: 112
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-02-24
- 修回日期: 2022-07-08
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-07
- 刊出日期: 2022-07-28

Fertilizer Conservation and Yield Enhancement on Single-cropping Rice Cultivation by Azolla Application

DENG Sufang^{1, 2
,},
ZHAN Jie^{1, 2},
YANG Yanqiu^{1, 2},
ZHENG Huifen^{1, 2},
YING Zhaoyang^{1, 2
, ,}

1.
Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
2.
National Azolla Germplasm Resource Center, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的开展红萍还田替代不同数量化肥对后茬水稻生长和稻田土壤的影响研究，明确水生绿肥红萍对单季稻的化肥减施效应。方法试验设计了3个减肥水平（氮钾肥减20%、40%、60%），比较了30 t·hm⁻²红萍还田替代不同数量氮钾化肥对后茬水稻的产量、生物学性状及土壤肥力的影响。结果与常规（配方）施肥处理相比，每公顷翻压30 t鲜红萍、减施氮钾化肥20%的处理，水稻的株高、有效分蘖数和丛穗数明显提高，产量增加11.11%，并达到显著性水平（P＜0.05）。红萍还田处理的土壤pH值、有机质、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾较未还田处理均有不同程度的提高。常规施肥处理下，红萍还田显著增加了土壤有机质（P＜0.05）。减60%氮钾肥并辅以红萍还田处理（T6）的速效钾含量与常规施肥处理的差异达显著性水平（P＜0.05）。结论每公顷翻压30 t新鲜红萍可以替代常规施肥中20%的氮钾肥，还能显著增加稻谷产量11.11%，并达到培肥地力的作用，是实现单季稻减肥增效的有效措施。本研究可为红萍在单季稻中的绿肥利用提供数据支持。
- 绿肥 /
- 红萍 /
- 还田 /
- 减肥 /
- 培肥
Abstract: Objective Effects of application of aquatic green manure Azolla on fertilizer use reduction and productivity improvement for single-cropping rice farming were studied. Method An experimentation using Azolla at a rate of 30 t·hm⁻² to replace 20%, 40%, and 60% N and K fertilizers was conducted. The resulting grain yield, plant biological characteristics, and soil fertility were monitored. Results In comparison to the conventional fertilization, the application of Azolla to achieve 20% reduction on the use of N and K fertilizers rendered significant increases on plant height, effective tillers count, and panicles per plant with an 11.11% rise on the crop yield (P＜0.05). The pH, organic matters, alkali-hydrolyzed N, available P, and readily available K of the treated soil were improved to varying extents. In general, plowing Azolla into the field significantly increased organic matters in the soil (P＜0.05). The treatment to reduce 60% use of conventional chemical fertilizers with Azolla (T6) made a significantly difference on the readily available K in soil (P＜0.05). Conclusion Application of Azolla at a rate of 30 t·hm⁻² to replace 20% of N and K for fertilization could significantly upgrade the soil fertility and increase the grain yield by 11.11%. It was considered an effective means not only to conserve fertilizer with green manure but also benefit the production of single-cropping rice farming.
- Green manure /
- Azolla /
- returning application /
- fertilizer reduction /
- soil fertility

HTML全文

表 1 不同处理小区施肥量

Table 1. Amounts of fertilizer applied on plots for treatments

处理 Treatment	红萍还田量 Plow-down amount/kg	基肥 Base fertilizer			分蘖肥 Tiller fertilizer		孕穗肥 Booting fertilizer
处理 Treatment	红萍还田量 Plow-down amount/kg	尿素 Urea/g	过磷酸钙 Superphosphate/g	氯化钾 Potassium chloride/g	尿素 Urea/g	氯化钾 Potassium chloride/g	尿素 Urea/g	氯化钾 Potassium chloride/g
T1	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
T2	0	375.65	1200.00	144.00	281.74	108.00	281.74	108.00
T3	72.00	375.65	1200.00	144.00	281.74	108.00	281.74	108.00
T4	72.00	300.52	1200.00	115.20	225.39	86.40	225.39	86.40
T5	72.00	225.39	1200.00	86.40	169.04	64.80	169.04	64.80
T6	72.00	150.26	1200.00	57.60	112.70	43.20	112.70	43.20
表中施肥量为单个小区（24 m²）的施肥量。 The fertilization amount in the table is the fertilization amount of a single plot (24 m²).

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 红萍还田对水稻产量的影响

Table 2. Effect of Azolla application on rice yield

处理 Treatment	稻谷产量 Grain yield/(t·hm⁻²)	比T1 Compared to T1		比T2 Compared to T2		秸秆产量 Straw yield/(t·hm⁻²)	收获指数 Harvest index
处理 Treatment	稻谷产量 Grain yield/(t·hm⁻²)	增产量 Yield increment/(t·hm⁻²)	增产率 Yield increase rate/%	增产量 Yield increment/(t·hm⁻²)	增产率 Yield increase rate/%	秸秆产量 Straw yield/(t·hm⁻²)	收获指数 Harvest index
T1	7.32±0.09 d	—	—	—	—	6.59±0.11 c	0.53±0.01 a
T2	9.07±0.30 bc	1.75	23.86	—	—	8.90±1.34 ab	0.51±0.03 a
T3	9.68±0.26 ab	2.36	32.28	0.62	6.80	9.82±1.11 a	0.50±0.03 a
T4	10.07±0.35 a	2.75	37.63	1.01	11.11	9.51±0.66 ab	0.51±0.02 a
T5	8.98±0.86 bc	1.66	22.73	−0.08	−0.92	7.80±1.43 bc	0.54±0.03 a
T6	8.63±0.91 c	1.31	17.84	−0.44	−4.86	8.33±0.49 abc	0.51±0.02 a
同列不同字母表示不同处理间差异显著（P ＜0.05）； “―”表示未参与比较。下同。 The different letters in the same column indicate significant difference between different treatments (P ＜ 0.05)." —"means not participating in the comparison. Same as below.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 红萍还田对水稻产量构成因素的影响

Table 3. Effect of Azolla application on rice yield components

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height/cm	有效分蘖数 No. of effective tillers	丛穗数 No. of spike per plant	穗长 Spike length/cm	穗粒数 No. of grains per spike	结实率 Seed setting rate/%	千粒重 1000 grain weight/g
T1	125.03±1.76 d	5.27±0.35 c	5.56±0.39 c	22.50±0.20 b	275.24±24.12 a	91.00±0.04 a	25.43±0.70 a
T2	140.91±3.80 abc	7.62±0.39 a	7.07±0.78 bc	24.22±0.47 a	287.12±23.79 a	91.70±0.01 a	25.29±0.64 a
T3	145.33±0.71 a	7.84±0.37 a	8.33±0.00 a	23.95±0.46 a	299.13±15.24 a	81.67±0.11 a	23.70±1.22 b
T4	144.25±3.43 ab	7.87±0.58 a	8.33±0.34 a	23.70±0.71 a	264.46±24.49 a	87.67±0.04 a	24.47±0.72 ab
T5	138.46±4.70 bc	6.87±0.70 ab	8.00±1.20 ab	23.68±1.00 a	283.35±12.03 a	88.33±0.09 a	25.53±0.15 a
T6	137.49±3.75 c	6.11±0.84 bc	6.11±0.51 c	23.48±0.59 ab	279.03±52.64 a	88.98±0.04 a	25.60±0.36 a

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 红萍还田对水稻经济效益的影响

Table 4. Effect of Azolla application on economic benefits for rice farming

处理 Treatment	产值 Output value/ (万元·hm⁻²)	肥料成本 Fertilizer cost/（元·hm⁻²）	红萍还田成本 The cost of returning Azolla to the field/（元·hm⁻²）	收益 Income/（万元·hm⁻²）	收入比T1增加 Income increased over T1/%	收入比T2增加 Income increased over T2/%
T1	2.05±0.03 c	0	0	2.05±0.03 c	—	—
T2	2.54±0.08 b	1194.00	0	2.42±0.08 ab	18.09	—
T3	2.71±0.07 ab	1194.00	380.00	2.55±0.07 ab	24.75	5.64
T4	2.82±0.10 a	978.00	380.00	2.69±0.10 a	31.17	11.07
T5	2.52±0.24 b	762.00	380.00	2.40±0.24 b	17.84	−0.21
T6	2.42±0.26 b	546.00	380.00	2.32±0.26 bc	13.47	−3.91

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 红萍还田对水稻收获后土壤养分含量的影响

Table 5. Effect of Azolla application on nutrients in soil after rice harvest

处理 Treatment	pH	有机质 Organic matter/ （g·kg⁻¹）	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen/（mg·kg⁻¹）	有效磷 Available phosphorus/ （mg·kg⁻¹）	速效钾 Available potassium/（mg·kg⁻¹）
T1	4.97±0.04 a	29.01±3.07 ab	141.56±24.12 a	43.26±5.09 a	42.52±4.38 ab
T2	4.89±0.04 b	27.10±3.38 b	138.44±15.88 a	43.75±5.91 a	41.85±6.07 b
T3	4.88±0.04 b	29.87±3.72 a	150.50±22.95 a	43.90±6.30 a	47.01±12.98 ab
T4	4.93±0.03 ab	28.81±2.14 ab	144.86±11.16 a	45.36±5.13 a	45.68±1.51 ab
T5	4.92±0.01 ab	28.59±1.27 ab	144.09±13.37 a	49.46±4.38 a	45.35±1.07 ab
T6	4.91±0.03 ab	30.43±2.13 a	157.50±9.26 a	46.60±2.60 a	55.66±9.35 a

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(30)

[1]	付浩然, 李婷玉, 曹寒冰, 等. 我国化肥减量增效的驱动因素探究 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(3):561−580. FU H R, LI T Y, CAO H B, et al. Research on the driving factors of fertilizer reduction in China [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(3): 561−580.(in Chinese)
[2]	Osamu Ito, Iwao Watanabe, 孟世福. 红萍固定的氮对水稻的有效性 [J]. 土壤学进展, 1987, 15(6):35−39. ITO O, WATANABE I, MENG S F. Effectiveness of nitrogen fixation by Azolla on rice [J]. Progress in Soil Science, 1987, 15(6): 35−39.(in Chinese)
[3]	刘中柱, 魏文雄, 郑国璋, 等. 红萍富钾生理的研究 Ⅰ. 红萍对水体中钾的吸收 [J]. 中国农业科学, 1982, 15(4):82−87. LIU Z Z, WEI W X, ZHENG G Z, et al. Study on the potassium enriching physiology of Azolla [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1982, 15(4): 82−87.(in Chinese)
[4]	杨邦俊, 向世群. 有机肥对紫色水稻土磷酸酶活性及磷素转化作用的影响 [J]. 土壤通报, 1990, 21(3):108−110. doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.1990.03.003 YANG B J, XIANG S Q. Effects of organic fertilizers on phosphatase activity and phosphorus transformation in purple paddy soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1990, 21(3): 108−110.(in Chinese) doi: 10.19336/j.cnki.trtb.1990.03.003
[5]	王方维, 纪宝华. 细绿萍作为北方水田绿肥的供肥特征研究 [J]. 土壤通报, 1987, 18(5):217−220. WANG F W, JI B H. Study on fertilizer supply characteristics of Azolla filiculoides as green manure in northern paddy fields [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1987, 18(5): 217−220.(in Chinese)
[6]	刘中柱, 郑伟文. 中国满江红[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1989.
[7]	叶国添, 陆培基, 陈震南. 稻田养萍高产低耗多用的探索 [J]. 福建农业科技, 1984(2):27−29. YE G T, LU P J, CHEN Z N. Exploration on high yield, low consumption and multipurpose of Azolla culture in paddy field [J]. Fujian Agricrltural Science and Technology, 1984(2): 27−29.(in Chinese)
[8]	BAGHERI NOVAIR S, MIRSEYED HOSSEINI H, ETESAMI H, et al. Rice straw and composted Azolla alter carbon and nitrogen mineralization and microbial activity of a paddy soil under drying-rewetting cycles [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020, 154: 103638. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103638
[9]	YANG G Y, JI H T, SHENG J, et al. Combining Azolla and urease inhibitor to reduce ammonia volatilization and increase nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield of rice [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 743: 140799.
[10]	YANG G Y, JI H T, LIU H J, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer reduction in combination with Azolla cover for reducing ammonia volatilization and improving nitrogen use efficiency of rice [J]. PeerJ, 2021, 9: e11077. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11077
[11]	MALYAN S K, BHATIA A, TOMER R, et al. Mitigation of yield-scaled greenhouse gas emissions from irrigated rice through Azolla, Blue-green algae, and plant growth-promoting bacteria [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 28(37): 51425−51439. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14210-z
[12]	MASWADA H F, ABD EL-RAZEK U A, EL-SHESHTAWY A N A, et al. Effect of Azolla filiculoides on growth, physiological and yield attributes of maize grown under water and nitrogen deficiencies [J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 40(2): 558−573. doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10120-5
[13]	MAHAM S G, RAHIMI A, SUBRAMANIAN S, et al. The environmental impacts of organic greenhouse tomato production based on the nitrogen-fixing plant (Azolla) [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 245: 118679. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118679
[14]	KIMANI S M, BIMANTARA P O, HATTORI S, et al. Co-application of poultry-litter biochar with Azolla has synergistic effects on CH₄ and N₂O emissions from rice paddy soils [J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6(9): e05042. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05042
[15]	NY/T 1377—2007, 土壤pH的测定[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
[16]	NY/T 1121.7—2014, 土壤检测第7部分: 土壤有效磷的测定[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2014.
[17]	NY/T 889—2004, 土壤速效钾和缓效钾含量的测定[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2004.
[18]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[19]	林忠华. 红萍的养殖与利用(二) [J]. 中国农村科技, 1996(9):13. LIN Z H. Cultivation and utilization of Azolla II [J]. China Rurac Science & Technology, 1996(9): 13.(in Chinese)
[20]	KOLLAH B, PATRA A K, MOHANTY S R. Aquatic Microphylla Azolla: A perspective paradigm for sustainable agriculture, environment and global climate change [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23(5): 4358−4369. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-5857-9
[21]	王在德, 王璞. 红萍对水稻及土壤的作用 [J]. 北京农业大学学报, 1987(1):19−26. WANG Z D, WANG P. The effect of Azolla on rice and paddy soil [J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Pekinensis, 1987(1): 19−26.(in Chinese)
[22]	张钟先, 宋永康, 陈涵贞. 红萍钾对水稻的有效性 [J]. 福建省农科院学报, 1989, 4(2):21−27. ZHANG Z X, SONG Y K, CHEN H Z. The availability of Azolla-potassium for rice [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1989, 4(2): 21−27.(in Chinese)
[23]	李福夺, 尹昌斌. 南方稻区绿肥生态服务功能及生态价值评估研究 [J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(2):327−336. LI F D, YIN C B. Assessment of the functions and ecological services values of green manure in paddy fields in South China [J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(2): 327−336.(in Chinese)
[24]	唐贤, 梁丰, 徐明岗, 等. 长期施用化肥对农田土壤pH影响的整合分析 [J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2020, 42(3):316−321. doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2020.4506 TANG X, LIANG F, XU M G, et al. A meta-analysis of effects of long-term application of chemical fertilizer on pH of farmland soil [J]. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2020, 42(3): 316−321.(in Chinese) doi: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2020.4506
[25]	敖文, 温三明, 尹显高. 绿肥翻压还田对土壤理化性状的影响 [J]. 基层农技推广, 2018, 6(5):33−35. AO W, WEN S M, YIN X G. Effects of returning green manure to field on soil physicochemical properties [J]. Primary Agricultural Technology Extension, 2018, 6(5): 33−35.(in Chinese)
[26]	施书莲, 程励励, 林心雄, 等. 绿萍的增产和改土作用 [J]. 土壤学报, 1978, 15(1):54−60. SHI S L, CHENG L L, LIN X X, et al. Effect of Azolla on the fertility of paddy soils [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1978, 15(1): 54−60.(in Chinese)
[27]	SINGH P K, PANIGRAHI B C, SATAPATHY K B. Comparative efficiency of Azolla, blue-green algae and other organic manures in relation to N and P availability in a flooded rice soil [J]. Plant and Soil, 1981, 62(1): 35−44. doi: 10.1007/BF02205023
[28]	罗玲, 余君山, 秦铁伟, 等. 绿肥不同翻压年限对植烟土壤理化性状及烤烟品质的影响 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(24):13217−13219. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.24.111 LUO L, YU J S, QIN T W, et al. Effect of the different years' green manure treatment on the physical and chemical property of soil and tobacco quality [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(24): 13217−13219.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.24.111
[29]	高嵩涓, 周国朋, 曹卫东. 南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12):2115−2126. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20375 GAO S J, ZHOU G P, CAO W D. Effects of milk vetch(Astragalus sinicus) as winter green manure on rice yield and rate of fertilizer application in rice paddies in South China [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2115−2126.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.20375
[30]	贾芬, 黄毅斌, 唐建阳, 等. 调控稻田人工生物圈及其新耕作体系研究: Ⅰ. 稻田长期定位试验结果初报 [J]. 福建省农科院学报, 1993, 8(3):15−20. JIA F, HUANG Y B, TANG J Y, et al. Studies on artificial controlling biosphere in paddy field and new cropping system I. the preliminary report on long-term determination of soil fertility in paddy field [J]. Journal of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 1993, 8(3): 15−20.(in Chinese)