• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于SPAD值的春石斛假鳞茎成熟度无损判定模型

温碧柔 蔡雪妍 杨逸 彭杰良 陈方尧 闻真珍 刘伟

温碧柔,蔡雪妍,杨逸,等. 基于SPAD值的春石斛假鳞茎成熟度无损判定模型 [J]. 福建农业学报,2022,37(6):781−788 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.06.013
引用本文: 温碧柔,蔡雪妍,杨逸,等. 基于SPAD值的春石斛假鳞茎成熟度无损判定模型 [J]. 福建农业学报,2022,37(6):781−788 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.06.013
WEN B R, CAI X Y, YANG Y, et al. Noninvasive Determination on Maturity of Dendrobium nobile Pseudobulbs based on SPAD Measurements [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2022,37(6):781−788 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.06.013
Citation: WEN B R, CAI X Y, YANG Y, et al. Noninvasive Determination on Maturity of Dendrobium nobile Pseudobulbs based on SPAD Measurements [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2022,37(6):781−788 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.06.013

基于SPAD值的春石斛假鳞茎成熟度无损判定模型

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.06.013
基金项目: 广东省重点研发计划项目(2019B20214001);国家自然科学基金项目(30471223);广东省自然科学基金项目(04020574)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    温碧柔(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向:植物学(E-mail:702019335@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    刘伟(1964-),男,博士,教授,研究方向:植物资源利用(E-mail:liuwei@scau.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: S 682.31

Noninvasive Determination on Maturity of Dendrobium nobile Pseudobulbs based on SPAD Measurements

  • 摘要:   目的  春化处理诱导开花效果不稳定是春石斛生产中经常出现的现象,其原因是气候差异导致的假鳞茎成熟的具体时间不一致,春化起始时间难于把握。为准确判断春石斛假鳞茎的成熟度,确定春化适宜的起始时间,建立了本模型。  方法  以大龙虾(Dendrobium Hot Lobster)、Dendrobium Sakura Hime和甜心(Dendrobium Lucky Girls ‘Sweet heart’)3个春石斛品种为材料,测定不同成熟度春石斛假鳞茎自止叶向下的5个叶位叶片的叶绿素相对含量值(SPAD),通过该5个叶位SPAD值构建的函数关系建立了与假鳞茎成熟度的相关关系模型。以可爱河马(Dendrobium Lovly Hippo)及Dendrobium Sakura Hime 2个春石斛品种为材料,统计了经低温春化后假鳞茎的开花情况,以验证该模型的有效性。  结果  5个叶位叶片的叶的SPAD值之间的函数关系的k值(差异指数)与春石斛假鳞茎的成熟度相关,所构建的模型能够预测不同春化起始时间的春石斛开花情况,可用于春石斛适宜春化起始时间的判断。  结论  本研究提出的基于叶位和SPAD值构建的春石斛假鳞茎成熟度无损判定模型,是一种无损、快速、准确的方法,可提高春石斛生产中盆花的品质,也为春石斛精准调控栽培技术的建立奠定基础。
  • 图  1  春石斛的假鳞茎及叶片发育过程

    从左到右表示春石斛不同发育阶段假鳞茎形态及叶片叶位和状态(颜色);A指止叶;B、C、D和E为止叶下部的叶片及叶位。

    Figure  1.  Development of pseudobulb and leaves of D. nobile

    From left to right: shape, leaf position, and leaf color of a pseudobulb at development stages;A: stop blade;B,C,D, and E: leaves and positions below stop blade.

    图  2  大龙虾(D. Hot Lobster)5个叶位叶片的SPAD值随叶龄的变化趋势(n=3)

    A、B、C、D、E指由止叶向下的5片叶;实线指不同叶位叶片SPAD值;虚线为对应叶位SPAD值变化的趋势线。同一折线不同小写字母表示不同叶龄间差异显著(P˂0.05)。图3~4同。

    Figure  2.  Variation trend of SPAD measurements on 5 top positioned leaves of Hot Lobster pseudobulb (n=3)

    A,B,C,D, and E: 5 leaves from stop leaf down;solid line: variation curve of SPAD measurements on leaves at different positions;dotted line: linear trend corresponding to change curve of SPAD measurements on counterpart leaves. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different leaf age(P˂0.05). Same for Fig 3–4.

    图  3  甜心(D. Lucky Girls ‘Sweet heart’)5个叶位叶片的SPAD值随叶龄的变化趋势(n=3)

    Figure  3.  Variation trend of SPAD measurements on 5 top positioned leaves of Lucky Girls Sweetheart pseudobulb (n=3)

    图  4  D. Sakura Hime 5个叶位叶片的SPAD值随叶龄的变化趋势(n=3)

    Figure  4.  Variation trend of SPAD measurements on 5 top positioned leaves of Sakura Hime pseudobulb (n=3)

    图  5  不同生长阶段春石斛的5个叶位叶片SPAD值之间的函数关系(n=3)

    实线和虚线分别为春石斛5个叶位的叶片在止叶叶龄分别为10 d、100 d和190 d的SPAD值和线性趋势线;不同小写字母表示不同叶位之间差异显著(P˂0.05)。

    Figure  5.  Functional relationship between SPAD measurements on 5 top positioned leaves and maturity of D. nobile pseudobulb (n=3)

    Solid line and dotted line represent the SPAD variation and the linear trend of the leaves of the five leaf positions of D. nobile at the leaf age of 10, 100 and 190 d, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among different leaf positions (P˂0.05).

    图  6  6月至11月可爱河马石斛前5个叶位SPAD值的差异指数的变化(n=3,R2=0.7889)

    Figure  6.  Variability of difference index on SPAD measurements between 5 top positioned leaves of Lovely Hippo pseudobulb from June to November (n=3,R2=0.7889)

    表  1  可爱河马(D. Lovly Hippo)春化开始时假鳞茎的差异指数与春化效果(n=3)

    Table  1.   Difference index on Lovely Hippo pseudobulb before vernalization and flowering after vernalization (n=3)

    止叶展开时间
    Stop blade formation
    time
    差异指数
    Difference
    index(k
    开花节数比率
    Ratio of flowering
    nodes /%
    10 月2.62±0.39 a0.00±0.00 b
    8 月1.41±0.12 b42.34±2.91 a
    不同小写字母表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。表2同。
    Data with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P<0.05. Same for Table 2.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  D. Sakura Hime和可爱河马石斛差异指数与春化效果(n=3)

    Table  2.   Difference index on Sakura Hime, Lovely Hippo, and Lucky Girls Sweetheart pseudobulbs before vernalization and flowering after vernalization (n=3)

    品种
    Stain
    组别
    Group
    差异指数
    Difference index(k
    总开花数
    Total flowers
    开花节数比率
    Ratio of flowering nodes /%
    每花芽开花数
    Number of flowers per flower bud
    D. Sakura Hime组11.93±0.13 a0.00±0.00 b0.00±0.00 c0.00±0.00 b
    组21.77±0.40 a4.67±0.47 b12.35±1.17 b2.67±0.19 a
    组31.50±0.38 a15.22±3.84 a38.38±4.01 a2.45±0.24 a
    可爱河马石斛 D. Lovly Hippo组11.95±0.38 a6.11±0.45 b27.26±2.14 c2.07±0.11 b
    组21.59±0.37 a8.78±0.28 b36.70±1.94 b2.12±0.12 a
    组30.45±0.41 a14.00±0.90 a45.16±2.41 a2.48±0.12 a
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 武荣花, 李振坚, 王雁. 秋石斛品种及其温室栽培 [J]. 农业工程技术(温室园艺), 2007, 27(1):34−35.

    WU R H, LI Z J, WANG Y. Varieties of Dendrobium candidum and their cultivation in greenhouse [J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology (Greenhouse & Horticulture), 2007, 27(1): 34−35.(in Chinese)
    [2] 钟双林. 基于光温的温室春石斛兰生长与外观品质预测模型研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.

    ZHONG S L. A photo-thermal model for predicting growth and external quality of Dendrobium nobile in greenhouse[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese)
    [3] YUNG-TING YEN C, STARMAN T W, WANG Y T, et al. Effects of cooling temperature and duration on flowering of the Nobile Dendrobium orchid [J]. HortScience, 2008, 43(6): 1765−1769. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1765
    [4] 吴梅, 陈旭, 祝泽刚, 等. 年宵花卉春石斛调控栽培技术 [J]. 现代园艺, 2012(23):39−40,84,97. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4958.2012.23.028

    WU M, CHEN X, ZHU Z G, et al. Regulation and cultivation techniques of Dendrobium candidum in Spring [J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2012(23): 39−40,84,97.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4958.2012.23.028
    [5] 鲜小林, 万斌, 秦凡. 盆栽春石斛花期调控技术 [J]. 四川农业科技, 2010(1):38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1028.2010.01.021

    XIAN X L, WAN B, QIN F. Control techniques of flowering period of potted spring Dendrobium [J]. Science and Technology of Sichuan Agriculture, 2010(1): 38.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1028.2010.01.021
    [6] 孟长军. 北方地区春石斛栽培要点 [J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2012(4):86−87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2012.04.026

    MENG C J. Cultivation points of Dendrobium candidum in north China [J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2012(4): 86−87.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2012.04.026
    [7] 徐雨. 春石斛繁殖及花期调控技术的研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006.

    XU Y. Studies on biological characters of the propagation and the regulation of florescence of Nobile-type dendrobium[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2006. (in Chinese)
    [8] 张凤良, 李小琴, 毛常丽, 等. 橡胶树叶片不同发育时期SPAD值及叶色动态变化 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(1):83−90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.01.12

    ZHANG F L, LI X Q, MAO C L, et al. Dynamic changes of SPAD value and color of Hevea brasiliensis leaves during different growth and development periods [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(1): 83−90.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.01.12
    [9] 赵娟, 黄文江, 张耀鸿, 等. 冬小麦不同生育时期叶面积指数反演方法 [J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(9):2546−2552. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)09-2546-07

    ZHAO J, HUANG W J, ZHANG Y H, et al. Inversion of leaf area index during different growth stages in winter wheat [J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(9): 2546−2552.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2013)09-2546-07
    [10] 张晗, 赵小敏, 郭熙, 等. 基于冠层高光谱信息的水稻生长监测应用研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(12):1−9. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2018.12.001

    ZHANG H, ZHAO X M, GUO X, et al. Research progress on application of rice growth monitoring based on canopy hyperspectral information [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(12): 1−9.(in Chinese) doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2018.12.001
    [11] 乔雨, 赵传燕, 戎占磊, 等. 祁连山中部金露梅种群生长过程中的植被光谱特征 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(1):11−20.

    QIAO Y, ZHAO C Y, RONG Z L, et al. Spectral characteristics of Potentilla froticosa in growing process in the middle part of the Qilian Mountains [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(1): 11−20.(in Chinese)
    [12] 邹小波, 陈武, 徐艺伟, 等. 不同生长阶段枇杷叶总黄酮含量的二维分布检测 [J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2016, 28(3):354−358. doi: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2016.3.006

    ZOU X B, CHEN W, XU Y W, et al. Content distribution of total flavonoid in loquat(Eriobotrya japonica) leaves at different growth stages [J]. Natural Product Research and Development, 2016, 28(3): 354−358.(in Chinese) doi: 10.16333/j.1001-6880.2016.3.006
    [13] 岳学军, 全东平, 洪添胜, 等. 柑橘叶片叶绿素含量高光谱无损检测模型 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(1):294−302. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.01.039

    YUE X J, QUAN D P, HONG T S, et al. Non-destructive hyperspectral measurement model of chlorophyll content for Citrus leaves [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(1): 294−302.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.01.039
    [14] POSSINGHAM J V, SAURER W. Changes in chloroplast number per cell during leaf development in spinach [J]. Planta, 1969, 86(2): 186−194. doi: 10.1007/BF00379826
    [15] 陈乾锦, 池国胜, 袁帅, 等. 鲜烟不同采收成熟度和SPAD值与烤后烟叶质量关系研究 [J]. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(1):55−59.

    CHEN Q J, CHI G S, YUAN S, et al. Study on relationship among harvest maturity, SPAD values and quality of flue-cured tobacco after curing [J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2021, 33(1): 55−59.(in Chinese)
    [16] 徐照丽, 李天福. SPAD-502叶绿素仪在烤烟生产中的应用研究 [J]. 贵州农业科学, 2006, 34(4):23−24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2006.04.006

    XU Z L, LI T F. The use of the SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter during the flue-cured tobacco growth [J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 34(4): 23−24.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2006.04.006
    [17] 曾建敏, 姚恒, 李天福, 等. 烤烟叶片叶绿素含量的测定及其与SPAD值的关系 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(1):56−62. doi: 10.3969/mpb.007.000056

    ZENG J M, YAO H, LI T F, et al. Chlorophyll content determination and its relationship with SPAD readings in flue-cured tobacco [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2009, 7(1): 56−62.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/mpb.007.000056
    [18] 张志平, 刘启彤, 张秀衢, 等. 烤烟翠碧一号上部叶不同采收成熟度对烟叶产质量的影响 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(8):32−34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.08.009

    ZHANG Z P, LIU Q T, ZHANG X Q, et al. Effects of harvest maturity of upper leaves on yield and quality of tobacco leaves of flue-cured tobacco cuibi 1 [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(8): 32−34.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.08.009
    [19] 王志东, 陈宜波, 龚蓉, 等. 优质籼稻剑叶SPAD值与稻米品质相关性研究 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1):89−97.

    WANG Z D, CHEN Y B, GONG R, et al. Correlation between SPAD value of flag leaf and rice quality of high quality indica rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(1): 89−97.(in Chinese)
    [20] 王川, 高琴, 马称心. 基于参照SPAD值的不同采收成熟度对烟叶淀粉含量及品质的影响 [J]. 安徽农学通报, 2020, 26(18):137,166. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2020.18.053

    WANG C, GAO Q, MA C X. Effects of different harvest maturity on starch content and quality of tobacco leaves based on reference SPAD value [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 26(18): 137,166.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2020.18.053
    [21] 邓霞. 小麦灌浆期SPAD值对产量的影响研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2020.

    DENG X. Study on the effect of SPAD value on wheat yield during wheat filling[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Normal University, 2020. (in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  210
  • HTML全文浏览量:  80
  • PDF下载量:  9
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2021-12-02
  • 修回日期:  2022-04-26
  • 刊出日期:  2022-06-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回