• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

米根霉菌纤维素酶活性及其对农田废弃物的降解效果

王伟英 柯叶鑫 李鸿浩 肖顺 王宗华

王伟英,柯叶鑫,李鸿浩,等. 米根霉菌纤维素酶活性及其对农田废弃物的降解效果 [J]. 福建农业学报,2023,38(1):75−80 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.010
引用本文: 王伟英,柯叶鑫,李鸿浩,等. 米根霉菌纤维素酶活性及其对农田废弃物的降解效果 [J]. 福建农业学报,2023,38(1):75−80 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.010
WANG W Y, KE Y X, LI H H, et al. Cellulose Enzymatic Activity of Rhizopus oryzae and Degrading Efficiency on Agricultural Waste [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2023,38(1):75−80 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.010
Citation: WANG W Y, KE Y X, LI H H, et al. Cellulose Enzymatic Activity of Rhizopus oryzae and Degrading Efficiency on Agricultural Waste [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2023,38(1):75−80 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.010

米根霉菌纤维素酶活性及其对农田废弃物的降解效果

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.010
基金项目: 福建省自然科学基金项目(2020J011368)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    王伟英(1980−),女,硕士,副研究员,主要从事农业生物技术研究(E-mail:weiyingwang178@126.com

    通讯作者:

    肖顺(1978−)男,博士,教授,主要从事植物病菌鉴定与应用研究(E-mail:xiaoshun@163.com

  • 中图分类号: X 71

Cellulose Enzymatic Activity of Rhizopus oryzae and Degrading Efficiency on Agricultural Waste

  • 摘要:   目的  对米根霉菌的纤维素降解酶活性及其对农田废弃物降解效果进行探究和测定,以期促进农业废弃资源的合理利用,减少农业废弃物对生态环境的污染。  方法  把从霉烂的玉米棒芯中分离纯化到的米根霉菌C1,通过液态试验。测定发酵过程中羧甲基纤维素酶(CMCase)、滤纸酶(FPase)和微晶纤维素酶(Avicelase)的活性;将菌液接入到菜叶中,测定该菌株的降解力和酶活变化,分析其降解效果。  结果  在发酵液中,米根霉菌的CMCase酶活>Avicelase酶活>FPase酶活,其中CMCase活性达到35.33 U·mL−1,具有较强的活性。在固体发酵中,米根霉菌对农田废弃菜叶有很强的降解效果,在第6天时生成大量腐烂液,降解率为47%,而未接菌对照基本无降解,二者有明显差异。  结论  本试验所用的米根霉C1菌株属于纤维降解菌,具有较高的纤维素酶活性,对农田废弃菜叶具有明显的降解效果,可明显缩短降解时间,研究结果可为农田废弃物的降解和利用提供理论基础和指导思路。
  • 图  1  菜叶发酵过程酶活力变化

    同一种酶中的不同小写字母表示不同发酵时间之间差异显著(P<0.05)。

    Figure  1.  Changes on enzyme activities

    Data with different letters on same enzyme indicate significant difference at 0.05 level in different fermentation times.

    图  2  不同处理的菜叶发酵过程温度变化

    不同字母表示同一时间不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。

    Figure  2.  Temperature changes during vegetable leaf decomposition

    Data with different letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level among treatments at same sampling time.

    图  3  菜叶腐烂变化

    Figure  3.  Decomposition of vegetable leaves

    图  4  不同处理对腐烂液的影响

    不同小写字母表示不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),图5同。

    Figure  4.  Effect on R. oryzae C1 fermentation broth by varied treatments

    Data with different letters indicate significant difference between treatments at 0.05 level. Same for Fig. 5.

    图  5  不同处理对菜叶降解率的影响

    Figure  5.  Degradation of R. oryzae C1fermentation broth-treated vegetable leaves

  • [1] 宋大利, 侯胜鹏, 王秀斌, 等. 中国秸秆养分资源数量及替代化肥潜力 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1):1−21.

    SONG D L, HOU S P, WANG X B, et al. Nutrient resource quantity of crop straw and its potential of substituting [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(1): 1−21.(in Chinese)
    [2] 李明华, 孟秀梅, 王成龙. 纤维素酶高产菌筛选鉴定及酶学性质初步研究 [J]. 中国酿造, 2021, 40(8):134−138.

    LI M H, MENG X M, WANG C L. Screening and identification of high-producing cellulose strain and enzymatic property [J]. China Brewing, 2021, 40(8): 134−138.(in Chinese)
    [3] 石祖梁, 刘璐璐, 王飞, 等. 我国农作物秸秆综合利用发展模式及政策建议 [J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(6):16−22.

    SHI Z L, LIU L L, WANG F, et al. Development model and policy proposal for comprehensive utilization of crop straw in China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(6): 16−22.(in Chinese)
    [4] PAYNE C M, KNOTT B C, MAYES H B, et al. Fungal cellulases [J]. Chemical Reviews, 2015, 115(3): 1308−1448. doi: 10.1021/cr500351c
    [5] BOMMARIUS A S, SOHN M, KANG Y Z, et al. Protein engineering of cellulases [J]. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2014, 29: 139−145. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.04.007
    [6] SHAHAB R L, BRETHAUER S, DAVEY M P, et al. A heterogeneous microbial consortium producing short-chain fatty acids from lignocellulose [J]. Science, 2020, 369(6507): eabb1214. doi: 10.1126/science.abb1214
    [7] 周艳华, 张春艳. 黑曲霉产纤维素酶的研究进展 [J]. 农业技术与装备, 2021(8):72−73,76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-887X.2021.08.031

    ZHOU Y H, ZHANG C Y. Research progress on cellulase produced by Aspergillus niger [J]. Agricultural Technology & Equipment, 2021(8): 72−73,76.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-887X.2021.08.031
    [8] 刘国栋, 高丽伟, 曲音波. 青霉生产木质纤维素降解酶系的研究进展 [J]. 生物工程学报, 2021, 37(3):1058−1069.

    LIU G D, GAO L W, QU Y B. Progress in the production of lignocellulolytic enzyme systems using Penicillium species [J]. Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 2021, 37(3): 1058−1069.(in Chinese)
    [9] 周若飞, 汤斌, 李松, 等. 匍枝根霉淀粉发酵产纤维素酶的条件研究 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(6):93−97.

    ZHOU R F, TANG B, LI S, et al. Studies on the fermentation conditions of Rhizopus stolonifer to produce cellulase by starch hydrolysate [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2016, 42(6): 93−97.(in Chinese)
    [10] THONGCHUL N, NAVANKASATTUSAS S, YANG S T. Production of lactic acid and ethanol by Rhizopus oryzae integrated with cassava pulp hydrolysis [J]. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2010, 33(3): 407−416. doi: 10.1007/s00449-009-0341-x
    [11] 李鑫, 顾夕梅. 米根霉利用玉米芯渣同步糖化发酵联产富马酸和真菌壳聚糖 [J]. 林业工程学报, 2017, 2(6):97−102.

    LI X, GU X M. Co-production of fumaric acid and fungal chitosan from corncob by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation with Rhizopus oryzae [J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2017, 2(6): 97−102.(in Chinese)
    [12] 李霜, 徐晴, 黄和. 发酵法制备富马酸的关键技术及其进展 [J]. 生物加工过程, 2013, 11(2):52−57. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3678.2013.02.008

    LI S, XU Q, HUANG H. Key technologies and their advances for fumaric acid production by fermentation process [J]. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2013, 11(2): 52−57.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3678.2013.02.008
    [13] 吴钰洁, 牛剑峰, 乐超银. 根霉3.010产纤维素酶酶学特性研究 [J]. 中国酿造, 2009, 28(12):43−45.

    WU Y J, NIU J F, LE C Y. Enzymatic properties of cellulases produced by Rhizopus 3.010 [J]. China Brewing, 2009, 28(12): 43−45.(in Chinese)
    [14] 纪淑兰, 李迅, 王飞. 丝瓜络固定化米根霉催化光皮树油制备生物柴油 [J]. 化工进展, 2022, 41(10):5381−5389.

    JI S L, LI X, WANG F. Immobilization of Rhizopus oryzae onto loofah sponge as a whole-cell biocatalyst to preparation of biodiesel from Comus wilsoniana fruit oil [J]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress, 2022, 41(10): 5381−5389.(in Chinese)
    [15] 谭海刚, 刘晓珍, 刘金羽, 等. 小米-玉米粉发酵饮品的研究 [J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 34(4):279−283.

    TAN H G, LIU X Z, LIU J Y, et al. Study on the fermented beverage of millet-corn flour [J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2017, 34(4): 279−283.(in Chinese)
    [16] 赵国振, 熊向峰, 陈朝银, 等. 马铃薯淀粉同步糖化发酵制备L-乳酸条件的统计学优化 [J]. 生物加工过程, 2010, 8(4):6−11.

    ZHAO G Z, XIONG X F, CHEN C Y, et al. Optimization of production of L-lactic acid from potato starch by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation [J]. Chinese Journal of Bioprocess Engineering, 2010, 8(4): 6−11.(in Chinese)
    [17] 王海滨, 韩立荣, 冯俊涛, 等. 高效纤维素降解菌的筛选及复合菌系的构建 [J]. 农业生物技术学报, 2015, 23(4):421−431. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2015.04.001

    WANG H B, HAN L R, FENG J T, et al. Screening of highly efficient cellulose degradation microbes and construction of composite strains [J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2015, 23(4): 421−431.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2015.04.001
    [18] 张森翔, 尹小燕, 龚志伟, 等. 纤维素酶降解秸秆特性及其基因工程研究进展 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2015, 31(5):20−26.

    ZHANG S X, YIN X Y, GONG Z W, et al. Advances in research of straw degradation with cellulase and its genetic engineering [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2015, 31(5): 20−26.(in Chinese)
    [19] 李茂, 字学娟, 吕仁龙, 等. 添加乳酸菌和纤维素酶对王草青贮品质和瘤胃降解率的影响 [J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2020, 56(7):161−165.

    LI M, ZI X J, LV R L, et al. Effects of adding lactic acid bacteria and cellulase on storage quality and rumen degradation rate of Pennisetum purpureum [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2020, 56(7): 161−165.(in Chinese)
    [20] 陶治东, 何艳慧, 邓子禾, 等. 香菇菌渣高效纤维素降解菌的筛选及产酶优化 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2021, 37(11):158−165.

    TAO Z D, HE Y H, DENG Z H, et al. Screening of high-efficiency cellulose-degrading microorganism from spent Lentinula edodes substrate and optimization of its enzyme production [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2021, 37(11): 158−165.(in Chinese)
    [21] NGUYEN S N, VIEN M, LE T T H, et al. Effects of enzymatic treatment conditions on dietary fibre content of wheat bran and use of cellulose-treated bran in cookie [J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2021, 56(8): 4017−4025.
    [22] 梅金飞, 刚利萍, 余梅霞, 等. 烟草秸秆废弃物中纤维素降解菌的筛选、鉴定及产酶条件优化 [J]. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(8):15−23.

    MEI J F, GANG L P, YU M X, et al. Screening and identification of cellulose-degrading bacteria in waste tobacco stalks and optimization of enzyme production conditions [J]. Tobacco Science & Technology, 2020, 53(8): 15−23.(in Chinese)
    [23] ZHAO X S, LIU L Y, DENG Z J, et al. Screening, cloning, enzymatic properties of a novel thermostable cellulase enzyme, and its potential application on water hyacinth utilization [J]. International Microbiology, 2021, 24(3): 337−349. doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00170-4
    [24] 吴婧, 聂彩娥, 朱媛媛, 等. 一株兼具产IAA能力纤维素降解菌的筛选、鉴定及条件优化 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2020, 36(12):54−63.

    WU J, NIE C E, ZHU Y Y, et al. Isolation, identification of a cellulose-degrading bacterium with IAA-producing ability and optimization of its culture conditions [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2020, 36(12): 54−63.(in Chinese)
    [25] FENG X, DING H, TEJIRIAN A. Detrimental effect of cellulose oxidation on cellulose hydrolysis by cellulase [J]. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2009, 45(3): 203−209. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2009.06.002
    [26] 周群, 盛莉. pH对米根霉发酵厨余垃圾生产L-乳酸的影响 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2014(2):176−180.

    ZHOU Q, SHENG L. Effect of pH on yield of lactic acid from kitchen wastes fermentation by Rhizopus oryzae AS 3.819 [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2014(2): 176−180.(in Chinese)
    [27] 尹礎, 夏乐先, 柳建设, 等. 一株纤维素降解菌株的分离鉴定及产酶特征研究 [J]. 环境科学与技术, 2009, 32(3):50−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2009.03.013

    YIN C, XIA L X, LIU J S, et al. Isolation, identification of a cellulose-producing strain and characterization of cellulose-producing capability [J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 32(3): 50−53.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6504.2009.03.013
  • 加载中
图(5)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  364
  • HTML全文浏览量:  192
  • PDF下载量:  37
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-05-25
  • 修回日期:  2022-07-31
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-03-28
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回