• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

基于偏最小二乘判别分析研究铜藻液体肥对3种蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响

周明炀 付洋 成立文 曾美端 曾庆淞 郑毅

周明炀,付洋,成立文,等. 基于偏最小二乘判别分析研究铜藻液体肥对3种蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 福建农业学报,2023,38(1):116−126 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.015
引用本文: 周明炀,付洋,成立文,等. 基于偏最小二乘判别分析研究铜藻液体肥对3种蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响 [J]. 福建农业学报,2023,38(1):116−126 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.015
ZHOU M Y, FU Y, CHENG L W, et al. Evaluation of Sargassum horneri Liquid Fertilizer for Vegetable Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2023,38(1):116−126 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.015
Citation: ZHOU M Y, FU Y, CHENG L W, et al. Evaluation of Sargassum horneri Liquid Fertilizer for Vegetable Seed Germination and Seedling Growth [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2023,38(1):116−126 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.015

基于偏最小二乘判别分析研究铜藻液体肥对3种蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.01.015
基金项目: 福建省海洋高新产业发展专项项目(闽海洋高新〔 2015〕11号)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    周明炀(1999−),男,硕士研究生,研究方向:应用与环境微生物(E-mail:1263202739@qq.com

    通讯作者:

    郑毅(1970−),男,博士,副教授,研究方向:微生物工程(E-mail:eyizheng@fjnu.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: S 145.2

Evaluation of Sargassum horneri Liquid Fertilizer for Vegetable Seed Germination and Seedling Growth

  • 摘要:   目的  铜藻为沿海常见的低质海藻,为实现铜藻高质利用,以新鲜铜藻为原料制备铜藻液体肥,研究其对上海青、黄瓜和番茄等3种蔬菜种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响,并基于偏最小二乘判别分析(Partial least squares discriminant analysis,PLS-DA)探究铜藻液体肥增肥的生物学效应。  方法  采用酶法和发酵法2种工艺制备铜藻液体肥,并各设置5组稀释倍数(200倍、400倍、600倍、800倍和1000倍)进行种子萌发试验和幼苗盆栽试验。  结果  (1)种子萌发试验中,发酵法制备铜藻液体肥的200倍液、600倍液在上海青种子萌发上效果最佳,发芽指数较空白组显著提高11.8%,较两组阳性对照分别提高1.9%和1.3%;发酵制备的200倍液对黄瓜种子萌发影响最好,发芽指数较空白和两组阳性对照均显著提高,增幅分别达33.0%、21.0%和6.7%;发酵制备的1000倍液在番茄种子萌发上成效最佳,发芽指数较空白和两组阳性对照分别显著提升13.6%、14.4%和19.3%。(2)幼苗盆栽试验中,相关性分析结果表明各生长指标间普遍存在极显著正相关性,主成分分析(Principal component analysis, PCA)结果显示铜藻液体肥对3种蔬菜的影响作用各有差异,构建实验样品的PLS-DA模型分析不同制备方法的铜藻液体肥肥效并与阳性对照对比,结果表明发酵制备的400倍液对上海青幼苗促生效果最佳,各指标均显著高于阳性对照海藻肥,其中根鲜重提高最显著,增幅为144%;酶法制备的800倍液对黄瓜幼苗生长效果最好,各指标均显著高于阳性对照海藻肥,其中根长提高最显著,增幅为28%;发酵制备的600倍液对番茄幼苗作用效果最好,各指标均显著高于阳性对照海藻肥,其中株干重提高最显著,增幅为31%。  结论  铜藻液体肥具备很好的增肥生物学效应,发酵法制备的铜藻液体肥肥效普遍优于酶法制备,施用前者能提高种子萌发率,促进幼苗地上部分和地下部分的生长,以上结果为海藻液体肥的生产与应用提供科学数据。
  • 图  1  铜藻液体肥影响生长指标的主成分得分

    M-1:上海青+酶解铜藻液体肥;M-2:黄瓜+酶解铜藻液体肥;M-3:番茄+酶解铜藻液体肥;J-1:上海青+酵解铜藻液体肥;J-2:黄瓜+酵解铜藻液体肥;J-3:番茄+酵解铜藻液体肥。

    Figure  1.  PCA plot on scores of S. horneri liquid fertilizer affecting vegetable growth indicators

    M-1: B. chinensis + enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer; M-2: cucumber + enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer; M-3: tomato + enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer; J-1: B. chinensis + fermented S. horneri liquid fertilizer; J-2: cucumber + fermented S. horneri liquid fertilizer; J-3: tomato + fermented enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer.

    图  2  上海青幼苗生长指标的偏最小二乘法判别分析

    CK:清水组;M:酶解铜藻液体肥;J:酵解铜藻液体肥。下图同。

    Figure  2.  PLSDA on bok choy seedling growth indices

    CK: blank control; M: enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer; J: fermented S. horneri liquid fertilizer. Same for following figures.

    图  3  上海青幼苗生长指标的Biplot图

    X:各生长指标。下图同。

    Figure  3.  Biplot of bok choy seedling growth indices

    X: seedling growth index. Same for following figures.

    图  4  黄瓜幼苗生长指标的偏最小二乘法判别分析

    Figure  4.  PLSDA on cucumber seedling growth indices

    图  5  黄瓜幼苗生长指标的Biplot图

    Figure  5.  Biplot of cucumber seedling growth indices

    图  6  番茄幼苗生长指标的偏最小二乘法判别分析

    Figure  6.  PLSDA on tomato seedling growth indices

    图  7  番茄幼苗生长指标的Biplot图

    Figure  7.  Biplot of tomato seedling growth indices

    表  1  不同铜藻液体肥对上海青种子萌发的影响

    Table  1.   Effects of S. horneri liquid fertilizers on bok choy seed germination

    处理
    Group
    发芽率
    Germination rate/%
    发芽势
    Germination potential/%
    发芽指数
    Germination index
    CK100.00±0.00 a98.67±1.15 a89.44±1.25 d
    AC199.67±0.58 ab99.33±0.58 a98.11±1.4 ab
    AC2100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a98.67±1.89 a
    M200100.00±0.00 a97.33±2.52 ab73.67±1.04 f
    M400100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a94.67±2.02 bc
    M60099.67±0.58 ab99.67±0.58 a98.50±1.32 a
    M800100.00±0.00 a95.67±3.21 b83.94±1.44 e
    M1000100.00±0.00 a97.67±2.31 ab93.92±6.39 c
    J200100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a
    J40099.33±0.58 b99.33±0.58 a99.33±0.58 a
    J600100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a
    J80099.67±0.58 ab99.33±1.15 a99.44±0.96 a
    J1000100.00±0.00 a100.00±0.00 a99.50±0.50 a
    表中数据为平均值±标准偏差;同列不同小写字母表示在0.05水平差异显著。下表同。
    The data in the table are mean ± standard deviation; different lowercase letters in the same column indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level. Same for following table.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  施用铜藻液体肥对黄瓜种子萌发的影响

    Table  2.   Effects of S. horneri liquid fertilizers on cucumber seed germination

    处理
    Group
    发芽率
    Germination rate/%
    发芽势
    Germination potential/%
    发芽指数
    Germination index
    CK98.33±0.58 ab97.67±1.53 a69.38±3.56 e
    AC198.00±1.00 ab97.67±1.53 a76.28±1.09 d
    AC297.33±1.53 ab97.00±2.00 a86.48±2.42 bc
    M20098.67±2.31 ab98.00±1.73 a90.18±3.35 ab
    M40097.67±0.58 ab96.67±0.58 a88.33±3.59 abc
    M60098.00±1.73 ab97.33±1.15 a77.72±2.45 d
    M80097.00±1.00 ab96.00±2.00 a86.86±4.00 bc
    M100099.67±0.58 a98.67±0.58 a90.66±2.40 ab
    J20097.00±1.00 ab96.33±0.58 a92.30±2.35 a
    J40097.67±1.53 ab97.00±1.00 a83.26±2.45 c
    J60098.33±2.08 ab97.67±1.53 a84.44±0.64 c
    J80096.00±1.73 b95.67±2.08 a88.09±3.41 abc
    J100097.00±2.65 ab95.67±2.31 a75.51±1.94 d
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  施用铜藻液体肥对番茄种子萌发的影响

    Table  3.   Effects of S. horneri liquid fertilizers on tomato seed germination

    处理
    Group
    发芽率
    Germination rate/%
    发芽势
    Germination potential/%
    发芽指数
    Germination index
    CK89.00±2.65 cd89.00±2.65 cd27.26±1.82 bc
    AC188.00±2.65 d87.67±2.89 d27.06±1.08 c
    AC289.00±2.65 cd87.33±4.16 d25.96±1.52 cd
    M20092.33±3.21 bc92.33±3.21 bc31.96±0.53 a
    M40093.00±1.73 bc92.67±2.08 bc23.16±0.70 d
    M60098.00±1.73 a98.00±1.73 a25.25±1.46 cd
    M80092.67±3.79 bc91.67±3.06 bcd25.09±2.56 cd
    M100091.00±0.00 bcd91.00±0.00 bcd25.05±2.93 cd
    J20092.33±0.58 bc92.00±0.00 bc30.75±0.28 a
    J40087.67±1.53 d87.33±1.53 d30.02±0.69 a
    J60090.33±0.58 cd90.00±1.00 bcd24.67±1.41 cd
    J80094.67±1.15 ab94.00±2.00 b29.85±1.88 ab
    J100093.00±1.00 bc93.00±1.00 bc30.96±0.90 a
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  幼苗生长指标相关性分析

    Table  4.   Correlation among seedling growth indicators

    生长指标
    growth indicators
    株高
    Plant height
    根长
    Root length
    株鲜重
    Fresh plant
    根鲜重
    Fresh root
    株干重
    Dry plant
    根干重
    Dry root weight
    叶面积
    Leaf area
    株高 Plant height 1
    根长 Root length 0.511** 1
    株鲜重 Fresh plant 0.689** 0.916** 1
    根鲜重 Fresh root 0.423** 0.972** 0.879** 1
    株干重 Dry plant 0.695** 0.893** 0.985** 0.856** 1
    根干重 Dry root weight 0.562** 0.951** 0.945** 0.938** 0.931** 1
    叶面积 Leaf area −0.088 0.752** 0.574** 0.800** 0.546** 0.684** 1
    *表示在0.05水平上显著相关,**表示在0.01水平上显著相关。
    * and ** represented significant correlation (P<0.05) and extremely significant correlation (P<0.01) respectively.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  酵解400倍铜藻液体肥与阳性对照对上海青幼苗生长的影响

    Table  5.   Effects of 400x dilution of fermented S. horneri liquid fertilizer and positive control on growth of bok choy seedlings

    处理
    Group
    株高
    Plant height/cm
    根长
    Root length/cm
    株鲜重
    Fresh plant weight/g
    根鲜重
    Fresh root weight/g
    株干重
    Dry plant weight/g
    根干重
    Dry root weight/g
    叶面积
    Leaf area/cm2
    AC13.342±0.007 c4.427±0.046 b0.406±0.002 c0.047±0.000 c0.019±0.000 b0.010±0.001 b0.503±0.007 c
    AC23.579±0.032 b4.669±0.097 b0.423±0.001 b0.058±0.002 b0.020±0.000 b0.011±0.000 b0.676±0.006 b
    J4005.517±0.006 a5.411±0.063 a0.613±0.002 a0.141±0.002 a0.032±0.000 a0.026±0.000 a1.525±0.011 a
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  酶解800倍铜藻液体肥与阳性对照对黄瓜幼苗生长的影响

    Table  6.   Effects of 800x dilution of enzymatically digested S. horneri liquid fertilizer and positive control on growth of cucumber seedlings

    处理
    Group
    株高
    Plant height/cm
    根长
    Root length/cm
    株鲜重
    Fresh plant weight/g
    根鲜重
    Fresh root weight/g
    株干重
    Dry plant weight/g
    根干重
    Dry root weight/g
    叶面积
    Leaf area/cm2
    AC17.083±0.014 c6.718±0.031 c2.402±0.002 c0.557±0.003 c0.194±0.004 c0.027±0.000 c1.965±0.002 c
    AC28.031±0.032 b7.105±0.018 b2.683±0.002 b0.591±0.002 b0.216±0.005 b0.029±0.001 b2.396±0.004 b
    M8009.860±0.024 a9.095±0.015 a3.077±0.004 a0.681±0.001 a0.266±0.002 a0.036±0.001 a2.998±0.004 a
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7  酵解600倍铜藻液体肥与阳性对照对番茄幼苗生长的影响

    Table  7.   Effects of 600x dilution of fermented S. horneri liquid fertilizer and positive control on growth of tomato seedlings

    处理
    Group
    株高
    Plant height/cm
    根长
    Root length/cm
    株鲜重
    Fresh plant weight/g
    根鲜重
    Fresh root weight/g
    株干重
    Dry plant weight/g
    根干重
    Dry root weight/g
    叶面积
    Leaf area/cm2
    AC19.31±0.032 c4.709±0.026 c0.628±0.003 c0.073±0.000 c0.090±0.001 c0.018±0.000 c0.310±0.003 c
    AC29.749±0.025 b5.536±0.028 b0.684±0.003 b0.087±0.000 b0.092±0.001 b0.019±0.000 b0.337±0.003 b
    J60010.486±0.021 a6.367±0.030 a0.799±0.001 a0.112±0.001 a0.121±0.000 a0.024±0.000 a0.395±0.000 a
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 秦雕, 李聪, 秦宇. 中国海藻产业发展与应用现状 [J]. 科技和产业, 2021, 21(3):104−110.

    QIN D, LI C, QIN Y. On the development and application status of seaweed industry in China [J]. Science Technology and Industry, 2021, 21(3): 104−110.(in Chinese)
    [2] LIU F, LIU X F, WANG Y, et al. Insights on the Sargassum horneri golden tides in the Yellow Sea inferred from morphological and molecular data [J]. Limnology and Oceanography, 2018, 63(4): 1762−1773. doi: 10.1002/lno.10806
    [3] 麻坤, 刁钢. 化肥对中国粮食产量变化贡献率的研究 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):1113−1120.

    MA K, DIAO G. Research on the contribution rate of fertilizer to grain yield in China [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 1113−1120.(in Chinese)
    [4] SRIDHAR S, RENGASAMY R. Influence of Seaweed Liquid Fertilizer on Growth and Biochemical Characteristics of Arachis hypogea L. under field trial [J]. Journal of Ecobiotechnology, 2011, 3(12): 18−22.
    [5] 方同光, 吴秋纫, 李根深. 用于促进植物生长的海藻提取液的生产方法, 所得到的海藻提取液, 及其复合肥料: CN1269339A[P]. 2000-10-11.
    [6] 周丽, 高进华, 解学仕, 等. 含腐植酸型海藻生物肥的研发及肥效评价 [J]. 腐植酸, 2021(5):30−35.

    ZHOU L, GAO J H, XIE X S, et al. Research and development of seaweed biofertilizer containing humic acid and its fertilizer effect evaluation [J]. Humic Acid, 2021(5): 30−35.(in Chinese)
    [7] SIVASANKARI S, VENKATESALU V, ANANTHARAJ M, et al. Effect of seaweed extracts on the growth and biochemical constituents of Vigna sinensis [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(14): 1745−1751. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2005.06.016
    [8] WAJAHATULLAH K, USHA P.R, SOWMYALAKSHMI S, et al Seaweed extracts as biostimulants of plant growth and development [J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2009, 28(4): 386−399. doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9103-x
    [9] ALMAROAI Y A, EISSA M A. Role of marine algae extracts in water stress resistance of onion under semiarid conditions [J]. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2020, 20(3): 1092−1101. doi: 10.1007/s42729-020-00195-0
    [10] 管宇翔, 韩西红, 张琳, 等. 海藻肥对黄瓜抗旱性的影响及机理研究试验 [J]. 种子科技, 2020, 38(21):3−5.

    GUAN Y X, HAN X H, ZHANG L, et al. Effect of seaweed fertilizer on drought resistance of cucumber and its mechanism [J]. Seed Science & Technology, 2020, 38(21): 3−5.(in Chinese)
    [11] 孙晓, 尹皓婵, 张占田, 等. 海藻提取物对水稻产量及养分利用的影响 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(16):100−103.

    SUN X, YIN H C, ZHANG Z T, et al. Influences of seaweed extracts on rice yield and nutrient utilization [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(16): 100−103.(in Chinese)
    [12] 付洋. 海藻液体肥制备工艺研究及肥效初探[D]. 福州: 福建师范大学, 2018.

    FU Y. Studies on the preparation technology and preliminary manurial efficiency of seaweed liquid fertilizer[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Normal University, 2018. (in Chinese)
    [13] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
    [14] 高紫云, 宋洪川, 郭嘉航, 等. 不同引发方式对甘遂种子萌发的影响 [J]. 云南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(6):44−50.

    GAO Z Y, SONG H C, GUO J H, et al. Effects of different initiation methods on seed germination of Euphorbia kansui [J]. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2021, 41(6): 44−50.(in Chinese)
    [15] 徐本美, 顾增辉. 种子活力的研究 [J]. 种子, 1989, 8(5):53−55.

    XU B M, GU Z H. Study on seed vigor [J]. Seed, 1989, 8(5): 53−55.(in Chinese)
    [16] 袁华芳, 周刚. 雷力海藻肥在大棚番茄上的应用试验 [J]. 上海蔬菜, 2010(3):62.

    YUAN H F, ZHOU G. Application experiment of leili seaweed fertilizer on tomato in greenhouse [J]. Shanghai Vegetables, 2010(3): 62.(in Chinese)
    [17] SINGH H P, BATISH D R, KOHLI R K. Autotoxicity: Concept, organisms, and ecological significance [J]. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 1999, 18(6): 757−772. doi: 10.1080/07352689991309478
    [18] 纪洪亭, 王勇, 曾燕楠, 等. 基于主成分分析评价不同类型肥料对向日葵穴盘苗素质的影响 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(29):100−106.
    [19] 施婷婷, 杨秀莲, 王良桂. 3个桂花品种花香组分动态特征及花被片结构解剖学观测 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):12−20.

    SHI T T, YANG X L, WANG L G. Dynamic characteristics of floral components and anatomical observation of petals in three cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(4): 12−20.(in Chinese)
    [20] 高嘉宁, 张丹, 何海燕, 等. 基于正交偏最小二乘判别分析法分析滇重楼和华重楼品质成分差异性 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2019, 25(1):136−142.

    GAO J N, ZHANG D, HE H Y, et al. Difference in quality components of Paris polyphylla var. yunnanensis and P. polyphylla var. chinensis based on the orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis model [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2019, 25(1): 136−142.(in Chinese)
    [21] 陈芊如, 褚德朋, Ilyas Naila, 等. 海藻提取物的农业应用研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(20):49−56.

    CHEN Q R, CHU D P, NAILA I, et al. Research progress on agricultural application of seaweed extracts [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(20): 49−56.(in Chinese)
    [22] 马光恕, 廉华, 杨瑾, 等. 海藻糖对NaCl胁迫下番茄种子萌发的缓解效应 [J]. 北方园艺, 2010(1):38−40.

    MA G S, LIAN H, YANG J, et al. Mitigative effect of trehalose on NaCl stress of tomato seed germination [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010(1): 38−40.(in Chinese)
    [23] 汤洁. 海藻植物营养剂的开发利用现状和前景 [J]. 中国农技推广, 2011, 27(6):41−43.

    TANG J. Present situation and prospect of development and utilization of seaweed plant nutrients [J]. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2011, 27(6): 41−43.(in Chinese)
    [24] 王旭承, 王婷, 王梦娇, 等. 海藻肥对低温胁迫下铁皮石斛抗氧化能力及相关基因表达的影响 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(1):194−201.

    WANG X C, WANG T, WANG M J, et al. Effects of seaweed fertilizer on antioxidant capacity and related gene expression of Dendrobium officinale under low-temperature stress [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(1): 194−201.(in Chinese)
    [25] 魏锋玉, 李赟. 海藻浸提液对小白菜种子萌发的影响 [J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(2):124−125.

    WEI F Y, LI Y. Effect of seaweed extract on seed germination of Chinese cabbage [J]. Modern Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 2011(2): 124−125.(in Chinese)
    [26] ZHENG S Y, JIANG J, HE M L, et al. Effect of kelp waste extracts on the growth and development of pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L. ) [J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 38683. doi: 10.1038/srep38683
    [27] MUTALE-JOAN C, REDOUANE B, NAJIB E, et al. Screening of microalgae liquid extracts for their bio stimulant properties on plant growth, nutrient uptake and metabolite profile of Solanum lycopersicum L [J]. Scientific Reports, 2020, 10: 2820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59840-4
    [28] 颜佳雯, 朱长俊, 王浩然, 等. 不同海藻肥栽培料对平菇酶活力的影响 [J]. 生物化工, 2021, 7(3):76−78,86.

    YAN J W, ZHU C J, WANG H R, et al. Study on enzyme activity of pleurotusostreatus based on different seaweed fertilizers [J]. Biological Chemical Engineering, 2021, 7(3): 76−78,86.(in Chinese)
    [29] 何锐, 谭星, 高美芳, 等. 添加不同浓度海藻肥对水培芥蓝生长及品质的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(11):2051−2059.

    HE R, TAN X, GAO M F, et al. Effects of different concentrations of seaweed extract on growth and quality of Chinese kale in hydroponics [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(11): 2051−2059.(in Chinese)
    [30] HERNÁNDEZ-HERRERA R M, SANTACRUZ-RUVALCABA F, RUIZ-LÓPEZ M A, et al. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L. ) [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2014, 26(1): 619−628. doi: 10.1007/s10811-013-0078-4
    [31] 杨春妹, 杨锦, 崔丹丹, 等. 海带酶解和菌解工艺优化及其降解产物对菜心抗逆性的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(8):1432−1444.

    YANG C M, YANG J, CUI D D, et al. Optimization of parameters for enzymatic and bacterial hydrolysis of seaweeds and the effects of two products on the stress resistance of Chinese flowering cabbage [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(8): 1432−1444.(in Chinese)
    [32] 金依静, 李蓝, 刘秋平, 等. 超声-复合酶解法提取海带中海藻酸钠的工艺优化 [J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(5):132−137.

    JIN Y J, LI L, LIU Q P, et al. Optimization of extraction process of sodium alginate from Laminaria japonica by ultrasonic-complex enzymatic hydrolysis method [J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(5): 132−137.(in Chinese)
  • 加载中
图(7) / 表(7)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  334
  • HTML全文浏览量:  103
  • PDF下载量:  50
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2022-04-11
  • 修回日期:  2022-08-12
  • 网络出版日期:  2023-03-06
  • 刊出日期:  2023-01-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回