Fertility of Tea Plantation Soil in Anxi
-
摘要:
目的 探究福建省安溪县茶园土壤养分及其分布情况。 方法 在安溪县22个主要产茶乡镇随机采集茶园土壤样品243个，通过测量土壤的pH值、有机质含量、全氮、全磷、全钾、碱解氮、有效磷和速效钾，并利用Fuzzy综合评估法计算出茶园土壤肥力综合指数（IFI），以此来评估土壤肥力质量等级。 结果 ①安溪县各乡镇茶园土壤pH值为3.79～4.97，均值为4.36，变异系数为11.51%，乡镇间茶园土壤pH差异显著（P＜0.05）。②只有一个乡镇茶园土壤有机质含量不符合Ⅰ级土壤指标（＞20.00 g·kg−1）。③茶园碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾含量分别为109.70～184.70 mg·kg−1、5.34～257.21 mg·kg−1、78.18～272.20 mg·kg−1，土壤碱解氮含量均为Ⅰ级，有20个乡镇茶园土壤有效磷和速效钾均为Ⅰ级、其余各有2个为Ⅱ级。④全氮磷钾含量分别为0.38～2.05 g·kg−1、0.14～1.76 g·kg−1、4.83～24.06 g·kg−1，其中有4个乡镇茶园土壤全氮含量不符合Ⅰ级标准，为Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级各2个；有5个乡镇茶园土壤全钾含量不符合Ⅰ级标准，为Ⅱ级4个、Ⅲ级1个；而全磷只有1个乡镇符合Ⅰ级标准，Ⅱ级和Ⅲ级分别占68.18%、27.27%，乡镇间差异较大；⑤茶园IFI肥力等级中Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级分别占81.82%、4.55%、9.09%、4.55%。 结论 安溪县茶园土壤酸化严重，有机质和速效养分总体较丰富，全量养分较缺乏，尤其是全磷含量普遍不足；总体肥力等级较好，但是养分结构不均衡、空间分布不均匀。因此，建议：（1）通过增施有机肥等手段改良茶园土壤酸化；（2）适当增施含氮磷钾全量养分的矿物质，以增加全量养分储备；（3）推广测土配方技术，促进精准施肥和减肥增效。 Abstract:Objective Degree and distribution of tea plantations soil fertility in Anxi County, Fujian were determined and statistically analyzed. Method Soil specimens were collected from plantations in 22 major tea-producing towns in Anxi. pH, organic matter, total NPK, alkaline N, available P, and available K of the soils were measured. Fertility IFI for each sampling site was calculated by the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Result From the randomly sampled 243 specimens, the following results were obtained. (1) pH of the plantation soils ranged 3.79-4.97 averaging 4.36 with a coefficient of variation of 11.51%. There were significant differentiations among the towns (P＜0.05). (2) On the content of organic matter, only one town did not meet the Grade I standard of being higher than 20.00g·kg-1. (3) Alkaline N, available P, and available K in the soils ranged 109.70-184.70 mg·kg-1, 5.34-257.21 mg·kg-1, and 78.18-272.20 mg·kg-1, respectively. Hence, the alkaline N in all specimens reached the Grade I level, but the available P and K left two localities fall into Grade II. (4) The total N, P, and K at all sites were 0.38-2.05 g·kg-1, 0.14-1.76g·kg-1, and 4.83-24.06 g·kg-1, respectively. On account of total N, two towns were rated Grade II and two Grade III; on total K, 4 were Grade II and one Grade III; and on P, only one qualified for Grade I and 68.18% of the towns rated Grade II and 27.27% Grade III. Significant differences were evident among the towns and villages. And (5) on account of IFI, 81.82% of the sites belonged to Grade I, 4.55% Grade II, 9.09% Grade III, and 4.55% Grade IV. Conclusion Soil acidification was severe at the tea plantations in the county. The soil was generally rich in organic matter and available nutrients, but deficient in total nutrients, especially P. The IFI at the plantations was generally of acceptable grades, however, the structure and spatial distribution of soil fertility were not well balanced. To overcome such shortcomings, it was recommended the following measures be implemented for the region: (1) using green manure to enrich organic matter content mitigating soil acidification, (2) increasing NPK application to enhance total nutrient reserve, and (3) formulating precise and efficient fertilization with routine soil testing to foster technical advancements. -
Key words:
- Anxi County /
- tea plantation /
- soil fertility /
- evaluation
-
图 1 安溪县茶园土壤pH、有机质分布
Figure 1. Distribution of tea plantation soil pH and organic matter in Anxi County
图 2 安溪县茶园土壤氮素含量分布
Figure 2. Distribution of tea plantation soil nitrogen content in Anxi County
图 3 安溪县茶园土壤磷素含量分布
Figure 3. Distribution of tea plantation soil P content in Anxi County
图 4 安溪县茶园土壤钾素含量分布
Figure 4. Distribution of tea plantation soil K content in Anxi County
表 1 茶园土壤养分分级标准
Table 1. Standards for classifying nutrient contents in tea plantation soil
指标
IndicatorsⅠ级
Grade ⅠⅡ级
Grade ⅡⅢ级
Grade Ⅲ优质茶园标准
High quality tea plantation standardpH 4.5～5.5 4.0～4.5或5.5～6.5 ＞6.5或＜4.0 4.5～5.5 有机质 Organic matter/（g·kg−1） ＞20.00 15.00～20.00 ＜15.00 ≥20.00 全氮 Total nitrogen/（g·kg−1） ＞1.00 0.80～1.00 ＜0.80 ≥1.50 全磷 Total phosphorus/（g·kg−1） ＞1.00 0.40～1.00 ＜0.40 ≥1.00 全钾 Total potassium/（g·kg−1） ＞10.00 5.00～10.00 ＜5.00 ≥10.00 碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen/（mg·kg−1） ＞100.00 80.00～100.00 ＜80.00 ≥100.00 有效磷 Available phosphorus/（mg·kg−1） ＞20.00 5.00～20.00 ＜5.00 ≥20.00 速效钾 Available potassium/（mg·kg−1） ＞100.00 60.00～100.00 ＜60.00 ≥100.00 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 土壤肥力综合指数分级标准
Table 2. Standards of comprehensive fertility index on tea plantation soil
土壤肥力综合指标 IFI IFI≥0.7 0.6≤IFI＜0.7 0.5≤IFI＜0.6 IFI＜0.5 肥力等级 Soil fertility grade Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ 肥力水平 Fertility level 高 High 较高 Higher 中等 Medium 低 Low
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 各项养分指标隶属度函数曲线转折点取值表
Table 3. Threshold nutrient index on membership function curves
转折点取值
Turning point
valuepH 有机质
Organic matter/
（g·kg−1）全氮
Total nitrogen/
（g·kg−1）全磷
Total phosphorus/
（g·kg−1）全钾
Total potassium/
（g·kg−1）碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen/
（mg·kg−1）有效磷
Available phosphorus/
（mg·kg−1）速效钾
Available potassium/
（mg·kg−1）x1 4.0 20 0.75 0.30 5.00 30.00 3.00 30.00 x2 4.5 60 2.00 1.00 25.00 150.00 40.00 200.00 x3 5.5 — — — — — — — x4 7.0 — — — — — — — —表示无该取值
— Indicates that the value does not exist
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 各项土壤肥力指标权重系数取值表
Table 4. Weighted factors of soil fertility index
指标
IndicatorspH 有机质
Organic Matter/
（g·kg−1）全氮
Total nitrogen/
（g·kg−1）全磷
Total phosphorus/
（g·kg−1）全钾
Total potassium/
（g·kg−1）碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen/
（mg·kg−1）有效磷
Available phosphorus/
（mg·kg−1）速效钾
Available potassium/
（mg·kg−1）权重系数
Weighting factor/%2.75 11.34 10.19 14.12 12.44 5.72 26.41 17.04
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 安溪县茶园土壤养分状况
Table 5. Soil fertility of tea plantations in Anxi County
乡镇
TownpH 有机质
Organic matter/
（g·kg−1）全氮
Total nitrogen/
（g·kg−1）全磷
Total phosphorus/
（g·kg−1）全钾
Total potassium/
（g·kg−1）碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen/
（mg·kg−1）有效磷
Available phosphorus/
（mg·kg−1）速效钾
Available potassium/
（mg·kg−1）蓬莱 Penglai 4.39±0.06gⅡ 62.6±3.44dⅠ 1.05±0.07fⅠ 0.83±0.00dⅡ 13.4±0hⅠ 123.27±18.48lⅠ 153.04±16.99bⅠ 78.18±5.83jⅡ 祥华 Xianghua 4.34±0.35gⅡ 62.68±21.46dⅠ 1.35±0.42cⅠ 0.43±0.32jⅡ 15.21±9.6fⅠ 145.63±32.47hⅠ 31.56±34.76hⅠ 102.54±54.77hⅠ 福田 Futian 4.26±0.11iⅡ 61.47±28.23eⅠ 1.12±0.17fⅠ 0.89±0.42cⅡ 11.08±3.96iⅠ 126.72±16.29kⅠ 20.22±24.87jⅠ 90.64±57.92iⅡ 感德 Gande 4.54±0.47eⅠ 52.56±25.38gⅠ 1.07±0.45fⅠ 0.55±0.26hⅡ 15.27±6.92fⅠ 123.9±22.99lⅠ 83.25±72.5eⅠ 101.68±58.07iⅠ 虎邱 Huqiu 4.88±0.6bⅠ 55.2±20.7gⅠ 1.14±0.25fⅠ 0.81±0.28eⅡ 15.43±5.41fⅠ 142.49±29.12iⅠ 111.42±64.06cⅠ 238.66±86.28bⅠ 剑斗 Jiandou 4.07±0.19jⅡ 38.39±19.58mⅠ 1.11±0.36fⅠ 0.92±0.20cⅡ 13.84±2.26gⅠ 127.53±20.49kⅠ 84.46±66.7eⅠ 134.88±41.07gⅠ 桃舟 Taozhou 4.53±0.35eⅠ 58.04±14.12gⅠ 1.22±0.17eⅠ 0.67±0.30fⅡ 14.54±8.69fⅠ 136.12±24.22jⅠ 51.88±58.28hⅠ 162.69±52.44fⅠ 金谷 Jingu 4.59±0.13dⅠ 7.35±1.66oⅢ 0.38±0.05iⅢ 0.14±0.02oⅢ 12.35±1.21hⅠ 109.7±3.93mⅠ 5.34±3.83kⅡ 113.45±31.83hⅠ 湖上 Hushang 4.44±0.33fⅡ 42.62±18.8jⅠ 1.11±0.39fⅠ 0.87±0.22cⅡ 8.15±4.33kⅡ 184.7±34.66aⅠ 17.56±23.82jⅡ 114.78±72.6hⅠ 官桥 Guanqiao 3.99±0.26kⅢ 59.85±31.8fⅠ 1.17±0.35eⅠ 0.31±0.17lⅢ 4.83±0.62mⅢ 160.36±29.29eⅠ 63.65±70.91fⅠ 106.68±54.34hⅠ 蓝田 Lantian 3.92±0.2lⅢ 55.46±16.25gⅠ 1.32±0.46cⅠ 1.764±0.00aⅠ 18.1±0eⅠ 137.54±25.75jⅠ 257.21±36.28aⅠ 179.33±28.11eⅠ 大坪 Daping 4.01±0.44kⅡ 72.35±29.57aⅠ 1.58±0.3bⅠ 0.38±11.33kⅢ 24.06±3.71aⅠ 137.93±22.48jⅠ 46.37±49.44hⅠ 104.98±39.91hⅠ 长卿 Changqing 3.79±0.17mⅢ 65.06±18.86bⅠ 1.19±0.27eⅠ 0.89±0.25cⅡ 10.08±7.1jⅠ 170.3±70.71dⅠ 73.66±38.6fⅠ 189.85±106.37dⅠ 龙门 Longmen 4.73±0.44cⅠ 40.42±27.23kⅠ 1.3±0.59dⅠ 0.52±0.14hⅡ 20.45±7.15cⅠ 133.94±25.19jⅠ 87.71±108.6dⅠ 160.16±133.66fⅠ 参内 Cannei 4.32±0.27hⅡ 39.64±21.97lⅠ 0.88±0.25gⅡ 0.27±0.00mⅢ 5.8±0lⅡ 141.09±21.4iⅠ 24.03±25.18jⅠ 119.83±17.06hⅠ 芦田 Lutian 4.35±0.76gⅡ 44.31±23.47hⅠ 1.09±0.51fⅠ 0.89±0.15cⅡ 20.28±13.06cⅠ 157.5±46.55fⅠ 59.75±73.52gⅠ 239.98±171.94bⅠ 白濑 Bailai 4.27±0.3iⅡ 28.06±16.41nⅠ 0.98±0.33fⅠ 0.46±0.16iⅡ 19.6±8.2dⅠ 142.57±32.74iⅠ 28.59±26.73iⅠ 251.19±216.24bⅠ 龙涓 Longjuan 4.26±0.41iⅡ 54.69±22.5gⅠ 1.18±0.6eⅠ 0.64±0.19gⅡ 14.71±5.13fⅠ 149.28±26.95gⅠ 58.36±58.45gⅠ 167.1±61.63fⅠ 城厢 Chengxiang 4.97±0.4aⅠ 42.14±18.1jⅠ 1.26±0.62dⅠ 0.19±0.00nⅢ 9.7±0jⅡ 164.05±30.2eⅠ 31.38±26.62hⅠ 173.38±100.28eⅠ 湖头 Hutou 4.35±0.47gⅡ 43.56±19.61iⅠ 1.2±0.27eⅠ 0.49±0.11iⅡ 9.84±1.18jⅡ 175.87±22.8bⅠ 58.81±50.09gⅠ 272.2±201.37aⅠ 尚卿 Shangqing 4.62±0.17dⅠ 64.67±18.65cⅠ 2.05±0.96aⅠ 1.42±0.00bⅡ 22.8±0bⅠ 174.02±20.31cⅠ 36.71±36.68hⅠ 229.8±114.37cⅠ 西坪 Xiping 4.27±0.36iⅡ 40.85±20.06kⅠ 0.81±0.4hⅢ 0.23±0.06nⅢ 11.35±1.3iⅠ 147.24±26.63gⅠ 37.12±62.15hⅠ 177.99±150.92eⅠ 平均值 Average 4.36 50.96 1.14 0.62 14.53 145.82 60.66 165.50 变异系数(%)
Coefficient of variation11.51 47.54 71.4 110.68 23.96 52.14 42.72 59.16 表中数据显示为均值±标准差，同列不同小写字母表示差异显著（P＜0.05），Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ为茶园土壤养分分级标准。
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation; those with different lowercase letters on same column indicate significant differences at P＜0.05. Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, and Ⅳ are grades on soil nutrients of tea plantations.
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 安溪县茶园土壤肥力指数情况
Table 6. IFI of tea plantations in Anxi County
乡镇
Town土壤肥力
综合指数值
IFI等级
Grade分布频率
Distribution frequency /%Ⅰ级
Grade ⅠⅡ级
Grade ⅡⅢ级
Grade ⅢⅣ级
Grade Ⅳ蓬莱
Penglai0.743 Ⅰ级 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 祥华
Xianghua0.754 Ⅰ级 44.1 5.9 14.7 35.3 福田
Futian0.615 Ⅱ级 25.0 5.0 15.0 55.0 感德
Gande0.765 Ⅰ级 54.2 8.3 8.3 29.2 虎邱
Huqiu0.875 Ⅰ级 85.7 9.5 4.8 0.0 剑斗
Jiandou0.733 Ⅰ级 58.3 16.7 8.3 16.7 桃舟
Taozhou0.847 Ⅰ级 75.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 金谷
Jingu0.419 Ⅳ级 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 湖上
Hushang0.578 Ⅲ级 16.7 16.7 16.7 50.0 官桥
Guanqiao0.724 Ⅰ级 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 蓝田
Lantian0.861 Ⅰ级 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 大坪
Daping0.860 Ⅰ级 61.1 27.8 0.0 11.1 长卿
Changqing0.829 Ⅰ级 79.2 12.5 8.3 0.0 龙门
Longmen0.838 Ⅰ级 50.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 参内
Cannei0.574 Ⅲ级 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 芦田
Lutian0.864 Ⅰ级 55.0 5.0 5.0 35.0 白濑
Bailai0.729 Ⅰ级 28.6 42.9 28.6 0.0 龙涓
Longjuan0.835 Ⅰ级 66.7 18.8 10.4 4.2 城厢
Chengxiang0.744 Ⅰ级 33.3 50.0 16.7 0.0 湖头
Hutou0.814 Ⅰ级 60.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 尚卿
Shangqing0.983 Ⅰ级 54.5 27.3 18.2 0.0 西坪
Xiping0.740 Ⅰ级 24.1 15.5 15.5 44.8
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 柳书俊, 姚新转, 赵德刚, 等. 湄潭茶园土壤养分特征及肥力质量评价 [J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11):33−45. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020061LIU S J, YAO X Z, ZHAO D G, et al. An evaluation of soil nutrient status and balance in Meitan tea plantations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 33−45.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2020061 [2] 任艳芳, 何俊瑜, 张艳超, 等. 贵州省开阳茶园土壤养分状况与肥力质量评价 [J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(4):668−674.REN Y F, HE J Y, ZHANG Y C, et al. Soil nutrient status and comprehensive evaluation of quality of soil fertility of tea garden in Kaiyang of Guizhou Province [J]. Soils, 2016, 48(4): 668−674.(in Chinese) [3] 姜彬, 闫板瑞, 李家鑫, 等. 黄河中游渭北卤泊滩地区盐碱地土壤肥力综合评价及分析 [J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 52(3):371−379. doi: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2022-03-002JIANG B, YAN B R, LI J X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of soil fertility of saline-alkaline land in Weibei Lubotan area in the middle reaches of the Yellow River [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 52(3): 371−379.(in Chinese) doi: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2022-03-002 [4] 李政昊, 刘斯泓, 李嘉琦, 等. 辽宁省铁岭植烟区土壤肥力特征及综合评价 [J]. 土壤通报, 2022, 53(3):631−639.LI Z H, LIU S H, LI J Q, et al. Soil fertility characteristics and comprehensive evaluation of tobacco-planting area in Tieling of Liaoning Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2022, 53(3): 631−639.(in Chinese) [5] 李文昭, 颜雄, 徐国勇, 等. 遵义市典型茶园土壤肥力质量评价 [J]. 南方农业, 2019, 13(21):184−187.LI W Z, YAN X, XU G Y, et al. Evaluation of soil fertility quality of typical tea plantations in Zunyi city [J]. South China Agriculture, 2019, 13(21): 184−187.(in Chinese) [6] 温继良, 周元清, 杨东华, 等. 新平县茶园土壤养分特征及肥力质量评价 [J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2018, 33(5):925−933.WEN J L, ZHOU Y Q, YANG D H, et al. Nutrient characteristics and assessment for the fertility quality of the tea plantation soils in Xinping County [J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2018, 33(5): 925−933.(in Chinese) [7] 李娟, 章明清, 尤志明, 等. 福建乌龙茶园土壤速效氮磷钾丰缺指标与肥力状况评价 [J]. 茶叶学报, 2018, 59(1):19−25. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4872.2018.01.005LI J, ZHANG M Q, YOU Z M, et al. Plentiful and lack index of soil available nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and soil fertility evaluation for oolong tea garden in Fujian Province [J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2018, 59(1): 19−25.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4872.2018.01.005 [8] 王海斌, 陈晓婷, 丁力, 等. 福建省安溪县茶园土壤酸化对茶树产量及品质的影响 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018, 24(6):1398−1403.WANG H B, CHEN X T, DING L, et al. Effect of soil acidification on yield and quality of tea tree in tea plantations from Anxi County, Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018, 24(6): 1398−1403.(in Chinese) [9] 安溪县地方志编纂委员会. 安溪县志(第二版)[M]. 厦门: 厦门大学出版社, 2012. [10] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. [11] 中华人民共和国农业部. 国家绿色食品产地质量标准: NY/T 391—2000[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. [12] 中华人民共和国农业部. 国家茶叶产地环境技术条件: NY/T 853—2004[S]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005. [13] 刘娟, 张乃明, 邓洪. 勐海县茶园土壤养分状况及肥力质量评价[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(1): 79-86.LIU J, ZHANG N M, DENG H. Soil nutrient status and fertility evaluation of tea gardens in Menghai County[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(1): 79-86. (in Chinese) [14] MOKARRAM M, HOJATI M. Using ordered weight averaging (OWA) aggregation for multi-criteria soil fertility evaluation by GIS (case study: Southeast Iran) [J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 2017, 132: 1−13. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.005 [15] 缪叶旻子, 吴全聪, 李晓丽, 等. 基于改进模糊层次分析法的茶园土壤肥力评价 [J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2019, 49(10):80−87.MIAO Y M Z, WU Q C, LI X L, et al. Evaluation of quality of soil in tea garden based on the improved fuzzy analytic hierarchy process [J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2019, 49(10): 80−87.(in Chinese) [16] 杨文俪. 福建省安溪县茶园土壤酸化速率与改良技术 [J]. 茶叶学报, 2021, 62(2):89−93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4872.2021.02.009YANG W L. Acidification rate and improvement technology of tea garden soil in Anxi County, Fujian Province [J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2021, 62(2): 89−93.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4872.2021.02.009 [17] 户杉杉, 高水练, 陈倩洁, 等. 套种大豆对茶园化肥需求量的影响 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(12):2776−2782.HU S S, GAO S L, CHEN Q J, et al. Effect of interplanting soybean on fertilizer demand in tea garden [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(12): 2776−2782.(in Chinese) [18] 张赟. 康县茶园土壤肥力状况评价 [J]. 基层农技推广, 2019, 7(4):47−51.ZHANG Y. Evaluation on soil fertility of tea garden in Kangxian County [J]. Primary Agricultural Technology Extension, 2019, 7(4): 47−51.(in Chinese) [19] 张君, 蔡德宝, 杨树琼, 等. 丹江口库区不同坡度对土壤肥力特征的影响 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2):32−38.ZHANG J, CAI D B, YANG S Q, et al. Soil fertility characteristics of different slopes in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021(2): 32−38.(in Chinese) [20] 吴志丹, 江福英, 张磊, 等. 福建省安溪县铁观音茶园土壤氮素状况 [J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(1):16−24.WU Z D, JIANG F Y, ZHANG L, et al. Study on soil nitrogen status of tieguanyin tea gardens in Anxi County of Fujian Province [J]. Soils, 2020, 52(1): 16−24.(in Chinese) [21] 张智, 安冰, 付军, 等. 广西国有派阳山林场桉树人工林土壤肥力质量评价 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(9):2137−2143.ZHANG Z, AN B, FU J, et al. Evaluation on soil fertility quality of Eucalyptus plantation in Guangxi state-owned Paiyangshan forest farm [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(9): 2137−2143.(in Chinese) [22] 唐健, 赵隽宇, 覃祚玉, 等. 1993—2018年广西桉树主产区土壤肥力演变特征分析 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(1):94−99.TANG J, ZHAO J Y, QIN Z Y, et al. Soil fertility evolution characteristics in main Eucalyptus producing areas of Guangxi: 1993-2018 [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(1): 94−99.(in Chinese) [23] 吴志丹, 江福英, 尤志明, 等. 福建省安溪县铁观音茶园土壤钾素状况 [J]. 茶叶学报, 2018, 59(1):26−32.WU Z D, JIANG F Y, YOU Z M, et al. Study on soil potassium status of tieguanyin tea plantations in Anxi County of Fujian Province [J]. Acta Tea Sinica, 2018, 59(1): 26−32.(in Chinese) [24] SOLOMON D, FRITZSCHE F, TEKALIGN M, et al. Soil organic matter composition in the subhumid Ethiopian Highlands as influenced by deforestation and agricultural management [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2002, 66(1): 68. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2002.6800 [25] 吴岳庭, 李海平, 丁梦娇, 等. 玉米秸秆还田方式对酸性植烟土壤肥力及烟叶产值的影响 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(2):320−325.WU Y T, LI H P, DING M J, et al. Effects of maize straw returning method on acid tobacco planting soil fertility and tobacco yield [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 34(2): 320−325.(in Chinese) [26] 罗跃新, 林国轩, 邓慧群, 等. 测土配方施肥技术在茶园上的应用研究 [J]. 现代农业科技, 2011(24):83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2011.24.041LUO Y X, LIN G X, DENG H Q, et al. Study on the application of soil testing and formula fertilization technology in tea garden [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011(24): 83.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2011.24.041 -
点击查看大图
图(4) / 表(6)
计量
- 文章访问数: 234
- HTML全文浏览量: 112
- PDF下载量: 60
- 被引次数: 0
