Ecological Security of Cultivated Land in Qingliu County Analyzed by Entropy Matter-Element Model

QIU Ling-jing; FAN Sheng-long; RU Kai-li; SUN Qiao-yan; ZHANG Shan-shan

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.03.017

Volume 33 Issue 3

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(3): 313-320

QIU Ling-jing, FAN Sheng-long, RU Kai-li, SUN Qiao-yan, ZHANG Shan-shan. Ecological Security of Cultivated Land in Qingliu County Analyzed by Entropy Matter-Element Model[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(3): 313-320. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.03.017

Citation:

QIU Ling-jing, FAN Sheng-long, RU Kai-li, SUN Qiao-yan, ZHANG Shan-shan. Ecological Security of Cultivated Land in Qingliu County Analyzed by Entropy Matter-Element Model[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(3): 313-320. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.03.017

Citation:

QIU Ling-jing, FAN Sheng-long, RU Kai-li, SUN Qiao-yan, ZHANG Shan-shan. Ecological Security of Cultivated Land in Qingliu County Analyzed by Entropy Matter-Element Model[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(3): 313-320. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.03.017

PDF( 1039 KB)

Ecological Security of Cultivated Land in Qingliu County Analyzed by Entropy Matter-Element Model

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.03.017

College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China

Received Date: 2017-09-06
Rev Recd Date: 2018-02-15
Publish Date: 2018-03-01

Abstract

Abstract

Taking Qingliu county, a typical mountainous agricultural region in Fujian, as an example, this study selected 16 indicators, such as per capita cultivated land, to analyze the ecological security of the area. From 2010 to 2016, data were collected to fit in the entropy-based matter-element model for comparisons and evaluations. The results showed that (1) the security level of the area cultivated land belonged to the "transition toward security" classification, but the trend could possibly reverse; (2) programs like the "Comprehensive Utilization of Industrial Solid Wastes" enhanced the eco-security, but the population growth as well as 5 other factors could restrict the extent of potential improvement; and, (3) in general, the conclusion drawn by this study agreed with that obtained by the multi-index comprehensive evaluation with a few year-to-year discrepancies; however, the matter-element model was deemed more intuitive and accurate in analyzing the impact of individual indicators.
- cultivated land,
- ecological security,
- entropy-based matter-element model,
- Qingliu county

FullText(HTML)

References(22)

References

[1]	张锐, 刘友兆.我国耕地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(7):945-951. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/97642X/201307/46538072.html
[2]	郑华伟, 夏梦蕾, 张锐, 等.基于熵值法和灰色预测模型的耕地生态安全诊断[J].水土保持通报, 2016, 36(3):284-289, 296. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_stbctb201603049
[3]	宋振江, 杨俊, 李争, 等.基于层次分析法的矿粮复合区生态环境影响评价——以相山铀矿为例[J].湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版), 2015, 33(3):355-360. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hbmzxyxb-zrkx201503032
[4]	崔明哲, 杨凤海, 李佳.基于组合赋权法的哈尔滨市耕地生态安全评价[J].水土保持研究, 2012, 19(6):184-187, 192. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stbcyj201206039
[5]	BEESLEY K B, RAMSEY D. Agricultural land preservation[J].International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 2009, 25(6):65-69. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=55929c2aaf695b735bc54c6f5e891efc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[6]	吴大放, 刘艳艳, 刘毅华, 等.耕地生态安全评价研究展望[J].中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(3):257-267. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stnyyj201503001
[7]	樊鹏飞, 孟悦, 梁流涛, 等.耕地生态安全评价及时空格局分析——以传统农业区河南省周口市为例[J].河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 47(01):16-23. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-11415-1013267275.htm
[8]	欧定华, 夏建国, 欧晓芳, 等.基于GIS和RBF的城郊区生态安全评价及变化趋势预测——以成都市龙泉驿区为例[J].地理与地理信息科学, 2017, 33(1):49-58. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-STBY201506042.htm
[9]	刘小波, 秦天彬, 周宝同, 等.基于改进SPA的乐山市耕地生态安全评价[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 41(3):147-154. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/93403X/201603/668410668.html
[10]	张燕, 王莎.耕地生态补偿标准制定进路选择——基于耕地生态安全视角[J].学习与实践, 2017, 396(2):21-28. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JJDL201404001.htm
[11]	邓元杰, 张秋月, 曲比伟石.基于熵权TOPSIS法的内江市耕地生态安全评价及障碍因子诊断[J].云南地理环境研究, 2016, 28(5):61-68. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZJNB201508024.htm
[12]	郭荣中, 杨敏华, 申海建.长株潭地区耕地生态安全评价研究[J].农业机械学报, 2016, 47(10):193-201. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.10.025
[13]	杨俊, 宋振江, 李争.基于PSR模型的耕地生态安全评价——以长江中下游粮食主产区为例[J].水土保持研究, 2017, 24(3):301-307+313. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-STBY201302032.htm
[14]	张锐, 郑华伟, 刘友兆.基于PSR模型的耕地生态安全物元分析评价[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(16):5090-5100. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90772X/201316/47110551.html
[15]	王军. 石家庄市耕地动态变化与生态安全评价研究[D]. 石家庄: 河北师范大学, 2009.
[16]	赵文晖, 杨伟州, 王利香, 等.基于可拓优度评价模型的耕地生态安全评价——以保定市为例[J].河南农业科学, 2015, 44(2):60-65. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hnnykx201502013
[17]	范胜龙, 杨玉珍, 陈训争, 等.基于PSR和无偏GM(1, 1)模型的福建省耕地生态安全评价与预测[J].中国土地科学, 2016, 30(9):19-27. http://cpfd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CPFDTOTAL-DIDD201011004088.htm
[18]	国家环境保护总局.生态县、生态市、生态省建设指标(试行)[J].环境保护, 2003(9):21-28. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/HJBU200309005.htm
[19]	姚绍红.熵权法在多因素评估系统中的应用与研究[J].电脑知识与技术, 2015, 11(27):200-201, 209. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dnzsyjs-itrzyksb201527088
[20]	余健, 房莉, 仓定帮, 等.熵权模糊物元模型在土地生态安全评价中的应用[J].农业工程学报, 2012, 28(5):260-266. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2012.05.043
[21]	李鹏, 俞国燕.多指标综合评价方法研究综述[J].机电产品开发与创新, 2009, 22(4):24-25, 28. http://www.docin.com/p-510121675.html
[22]	马爱慧. 耕地生态补偿及空间效益转移研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2011.