Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Vegetations in Red Soil Erosion Area

ZHAO Zhuang; ZOU Shuang-quan; HUANG Zhao-chang; WANG Xiao-peng; HU Kun; ZHU Qiao-lian; TONG Chen-xiao; MAO Yan-ling

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.014

Volume 33 Issue 10

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(10): 1090-1096

ZHAO Zhuang, ZOU Shuang-quan, HUANG Zhao-chang, WANG Xiao-peng, HU Kun, ZHU Qiao-lian, TONG Chen-xiao, MAO Yan-ling. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Vegetations in Red Soil Erosion Area[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10): 1090-1096. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.014

Citation:

ZHAO Zhuang, ZOU Shuang-quan, HUANG Zhao-chang, WANG Xiao-peng, HU Kun, ZHU Qiao-lian, TONG Chen-xiao, MAO Yan-ling. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Vegetations in Red Soil Erosion Area[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10): 1090-1096. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.014

Citation:

ZHAO Zhuang, ZOU Shuang-quan, HUANG Zhao-chang, WANG Xiao-peng, HU Kun, ZHU Qiao-lian, TONG Chen-xiao, MAO Yan-ling. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Vegetations in Red Soil Erosion Area[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10): 1090-1096. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.014

PDF( 868 KB)

Distribution Characteristics of Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Under Different Vegetations in Red Soil Erosion Area

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.014

ZHAO Zhuang^{1, 2
,},
ZOU Shuang-quan³,
HUANG Zhao-chang^{1, 2},
WANG Xiao-peng^{1, 2},
HU Kun^{1, 2},
ZHU Qiao-lian^{1, 2},
TONG Chen-xiao^{1, 2},
MAO Yan-ling^{1, 3
,
,}

1.
College of Resource and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
2.
University Key Lab of Soil Ecosystem Health and Regulation in Fujian, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
3.
Fujian Colleges and Universities Engineering Research Institute of Conservation & Utilization of Natural Bioresources, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China

Received Date: 2018-08-27
Rev Recd Date: 2018-09-20
Publish Date: 2018-10-01

Abstract

Abstract

The soil collected from 6 types of vegetation inclued Podocarpus macrophyllus, Yulania denudate, Acer palmatum 'Atropurpureum', Camellia japonica, Armeniaca mume, Nageia nagi were studied and their soil physical and chemical properties were analyzed, in order to study the distribution characteristics of soil physical and chemical properties during the restoration process of ecosystem in eroded red soil region. The results showed that (1) Soil bulk density had a significant or extremely significant level of negative correlation with maximum water holding capacity, capillary water holding capacity, minimum field water holding capacity, non-capillary pores and total pores. Camellia japonica had the largest bulk density, poor soil porosity and water holding capacity, and the soil bulk density of Armeniaca mume and Nageia nagi cypress was small, and the soil pore and water holding capacity were better. (2) The soil pH ranged from 4.60 to 5.20, which was acidic. Nageia nagi soil had the lowest pH and the strongest acidity. The 0-20 cm soil layer of Armeniaca mume had the highest pH and the weak acidity. (3) The vegetation had an effect on the accumulation of soil nutrients. The soil organic matter content decreased with the increase of soil depth, and the range was 2.27-20.02 g·kg^-1. There was a significant positive correlation between total nitrogen and organic matter content. Yulania denudata soil showed higher phosphorus content, and available potassium was mainly concentrated in surface soil. (4) Analysis of soil comprehensive fertility index values showed that the soil quality collected from Yulania denudata was the highest, and the recovery effect was also the best. The physical and chemical properties of soil collected from 6 types of vegetation showed obvious differences. Yulania denudata was the dominant vegetation variety to improve soil structure and enhance soil fertility.
- red soil,
- soil erosion,
- vegetation,
- soil physical and chemical properties

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	陈志强, 陈志彪.南方红壤侵蚀区土壤肥力质量的突变——以福建省长汀县为例[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(10):3002-3010. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201310007
[2]	于泳, 林洪.我国红壤侵蚀研究进展[J].亚热带水土保持, 2009, 21(3):34-38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2651.2009.03.009
[3]	谢凯, 罗旭辉, 翁伯琦, 等.南方红壤区水土流失治理与循环农业发展对策研究[J].福建农业学报, 2013, 28(11):1159-1163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.11.017
[4]	鄢新余, 陈志强, 陈志彪, 等.南方红壤侵蚀区植被恢复过程植物群落多样性[J].福建师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 31(2):90-95, 120. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10389-2009170632.htm
[5]	姬少玲, 黄夏.自然恢复和人工重建对退化森林生态系统的影响[J].辽宁林业科技, 2017(4):32-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2017.04.012
[6]	鲁如坤.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2000.
[7]	张庆费, 宋永昌.浙江天童植物群落次生演替与土壤肥力的关系[J].生态学报, 1999, 19(2):174-178. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.1999.02.006
[8]	邓欢, 张斌, 王会利, 等.侵蚀红壤区不同人工植被恢复下的土壤肥力比较[J].中国农业科技导报, 2007, 9(3):79-85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2007.03.015
[9]	刘飞渡, 韩蕾.亚热带红壤丘陵区不同人工林型对土壤理化性质、微生物类群和酶活性的影响[J].生态环境学报, 2015(9):1441-1446. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tryhj201509003
[10]	BURTON A J, PREGITZER K S, HENDRICK R L.Relationships between fine root dynamics and nitrogen availability in Michigan northern hardwood forests[J].Oecologia, 2000, 125(3):389-399. doi: 10.1007/s004420000455
[11]	易小波, 邵明安, 赵春雷, 等.黄土高原南北样带不同土层土壤容重变异分析与模拟[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(4):198-205. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyjxxb201704026
[12]	黄昌勇, 徐建明.土壤学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2010.
[13]	单梦颖, 杨永刚, 吴兆录.云南省中部3种森林土壤含水率、容重和细根重及其垂直分布[J].云南地理环境研究, 2013, 25(4):38-44. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yndlhjyj201304007
[14]	康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等.南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J].应用生态学报, 2010, 21(10):2479-2486. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201010005
[15]	LEI Y, CHEN L D, WEI W, et al.Comparison of deep soil moisture in two re-vegetation watersheds in semi-arid regions[J].Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 513(1):314-321. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=48a37e697ff7e9955c920c0df1a41e1b
[16]	杨秀敏, 任广萌, 李立新, 等.土壤pH值对重金属形态的影响及其相关性研究[J].中国矿业, 2017, 26(6):79-83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2017.06.015
[17]	丁卉, 李朋飞, 孙维红, 等.不同种植模式对茶花生长及土壤理化性质的影响[J].江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(12):106-110. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201812025
[18]	路岑, 张维勇, 石磊, 等.梵净山不同植被类型下土壤养分的差异[J].贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(2):177-181. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2016.02.045
[19]	王美丽, 李军, 朱兆洲, 等.土壤溶解性有机质的研究进展[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2010, 23(3):304-310, 316. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2010.03.015
[20]	马芬, 马红亮, 邱泓, 等.水分状况与不同形态氮添加对亚热带森林土壤氮素净转化速率及N₂O排放的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2015, 26(2):379-387. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201502007
[21]	巩杰.黄土丘陵区小流域不同植被恢复类型的环境效应及生态适应性研究[D].北京: 中国科学院生态环境研究中心, 2005. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=Y1632266
[22]	姜红梅, 李明治, 王亲, 等.祁连山东段不同植被下土壤养分状况研究[J].水土保持研究, 2011, 18(5):166-170. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stbcyj201105035
[23]	朱秋莲, 邢肖毅, 张宏, 等.黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(15):4674-4682. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201315018