Evaluation of <i>Paeonia lactiflora</i> Varieties for Introduction to Yangzhou

QIAN Jingyang; LU Lili; LI Qin; TANG Yuhan; TAO Jun; ZHAO Daqiu

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.10.004

Volume 38 Issue 10

Oct. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2023 > 38(10): 1155-1162

QIAN J Y, LU L L, LI Q, et al. Evaluation of Paeonia lactiflora Varieties for Introduction to Yangzhou [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，38（10）：1155−1162 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.10.004

Citation:

QIAN J Y, LU L L, LI Q, et al. Evaluation of Paeonia lactiflora Varieties for Introduction to Yangzhou [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，38（10）：1155−1162 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.10.004

Citation:

PDF( 625 KB)

Evaluation of Paeonia lactiflora Varieties for Introduction to Yangzhou

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2023.10.004

College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu　225009, China

Received Date: 2023-06-09
Rev Recd Date: 2023-07-24

Available Online: 2023-11-20

Publish Date: 2023-10-28

Abstract

Abstract

Objective A variety of Paeonia lactiflora imported from abroad were evaluated for landscaping in Yangzhou, Jiangsu and for germplasm collection. Method The adaptability, characteristics, and ornamental quality of 21 peony varieties from foreign countries were examined based upon 12 selected criteria for a comprehensive evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Scores on the criteria were used to grade each variety for selection. [Result] The weighing of the scores on heat damage index, flower posture, bud differentiation, and florescence of single flower were more heavily among all indicators at 0.4180, 0.1496, 0.1393, and 0.0898, respectively. Of the 21 varieties, 8 (e.g., Peter Brand) scored greater than 3.5 were classified as Grade I and considered appropriated for promotion and application in the region; 6 (e.g., Buckeye Belle) between 3.0 and 3.5 as potentially applicable Grade II; and 7 (e.g., Teenage Boy) below 3.0 as Grade III not recommended for the introduction. Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation using the analytic hierarchy process classified the 21 peony germplasms for resource collection and introduction for landscape in Yangzhou and the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River regions.
- Paeonia lactiflora from abroad,
- cultivar introduction,
- analytic hierarchy process,
- comprehensive evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	王建国, 张佐双. 中国芍药[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2005: 11-12.
[2]	郁书君, 杨玉勇, 余树勋. 芍药与牡丹[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 12-16.
[3]	于晓南, 宋焕芝, 郑黎文. 国外观赏芍药育种与应用及其启示 [J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 36(S2):159−162,166. YU X N, SONG H Z, ZHENG L W. Brief Introduction of breeding and horticulture utilization of ornamental herbaceous peony at abroad [J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2010, 36(S2): 159−162,166.(in Chinese)
[4]	赵大球, 韩晨霞, 陶俊. 不同芍药品种耐热性鉴定 [J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 36(4):105−109. ZHAO D Q, HAN C X, TAO J. Heat tolerance identification of different herbaceous peony(Paeonia lactiflora Pall. ) cultivars [J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2015, 36(4): 105−109.(in Chinese)
[5]	张秀新, 王莲英, 薛璟祺, 等. 植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性测试指南—芍药: NY/T2225—2012 [S] . 北京: 中华人民共和国农业部, 2012-12-07.
[6]	史小华, 张佳平, 刘毅, 等. 国外引进盆栽芍药品种在杭州的生长观测及筛选 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2022, 20(1):334−342. SHI X H, ZHANG J P, LIU Y, et al. Growth observation and selection of potted herbaceous peony introduced from abroad in Hangzhou [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022, 20(1): 334−342.(in Chinese)
[7]	司仕英, 孟秦语, 孙道阳, 等. 关中地区引种芍药品种的综合性状评价 [J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(6):134−139. SI S Y, MENG Q Y, SUN D Y, et al. Evaluation on comprehensive characteristics of herbaceous peonies introduced in Guanzhong [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2021, 36(6): 134−139.(in Chinese)
[8]	史小华, 马广莹, 王小斌, 等. 芍药资源在浙江露地栽培的适应性评价[J]. 分子植物育种, 2022: 1-11. SHI X H, MA G Y, WANG X B, et al. Adaptability evaluation of herbaceous peony resources in open field cultivation in Zhejiang[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022: 1-11. (in Chinese)
[9]	杨春胤, 雷利锋, 刘新伟, 等. 应用层次分析法建立微型盆栽月季品种综合评价体系 [J]. 农业科学研究, 2018, 39(4):89−93. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0747.2018.04.016 YANG C Y, LEI L F, LIU X W, et al. Applying analytic hierarchy process to establish a comprehensive evaluation system of micro-potted roses varieties [J]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 39(4): 89−93.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0747.2018.04.016
[10]	艾叶, 陈璐, 兰思仁, 等. 基于层次分析法的建兰品种观赏价值综合评价 [J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 48(6):736−741. AI Y, CHEN L, LAN S R, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the ornamental value of Cymbidium ensifolium cultivars using analytical hierarchy process method [J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 48(6): 736−741.(in Chinese)
[11]	付存念, 潘可可, 杨程鹏, 等. 基于层次分析法的温州月季资源适应性评价 [J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2021, 48(5):763−770. FU C N, PAN K K, YANG C P, et al. Evaluation of rose resources on the adaptability of Wenzhou based on analytic hierarchy process(AHP) [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2021, 48(5): 763−770.(in Chinese)
[12]	ZHAO D Q, TANG Y H, XIA X, et al. Integration of transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome provides insights into how calcium enhances the mechanical strength of herbaceous peony inflorescence stems [J]. Cells, 2019, 8(2): 102. doi: 10.3390/cells8020102
[13]	ZHAO D Q, LUAN Y T, SHI W B, et al. Melatonin enhances stem strength by increasing lignin content and secondary cell wall thickness in herbaceous peony [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2022, 73(17): 5974−5991. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac165
[14]	ZHANG T T, TANG Y H, LUAN Y T, et al. Herbaceous peony AP2/ERF transcription factor binds the promoter of the tryptophan decarboxylase gene to enhance high-temperature stress tolerance [J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2022, 45(9): 2729−2743.
[15]	HAO Z J, LIU D, GONG S J, et al. High throughput sequencing of herbaceous peony small RNAs to screen thermo-tolerance related microRNAs [J]. Genes & Genomics, 2017, 39(4): 397−408.
[16]	WU Y Q, LI T T, CHENG Z Y, et al. R2R3-MYB transcription factor PlMYB108 confers drought tolerance in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall. ) [J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2021, 22(21): 11884. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111884
[17]	ZHAO D Q, ZHANG X Y, WANG R, et al. Herbaceous peony tryptophan decarboxylase confers drought and salt stresses tolerance [J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019, 162: 345−356. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.03.013
[18]	黄永高, 何小弟, 金飚, 等. 扬州芍药种质资源现状的鉴定和评价 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006, 34(5):177−180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2006.05.069 HUANG Y G, HE X D, JIN B, et al. Identification and evaluation of Yangzhou Paeonia lactiflora germplasm resources [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 34(5): 177−180.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2006.05.069
[19]	刘苏闽, 赵明, 何小弟, 等. 芍药性状聚类分析及其在育种上的应用 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2009, 37(6):240−242. LIU S M, ZHAO M, HE X D, et al. Cluster analysis of Paeonia lactiflora characters and its application in breeding [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 37(6): 240−242.(in Chinese)
[20]	王荣, 何智冲, 方学敏, 等. 扬州芍药栽培品种表型多样性分析 [J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(6):901−908. WANG R, HE Z C, FANG X M, et al. Analysis of phenotypic diversity of Paeonia lactiflora cultivars in Yangzhou [J]. Plant Science Journal, 2016, 34(6): 901−908.(in Chinese)
[21]	ZHANG J P, LI D Q, SHI X H, et al. Mining and expression analysis of candidate genes involved in regulating the chilling requirement fulfillment of Paeonia lactiflora ‘Hang Baishao’ [J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2017, 17(1): 262. doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1205-1
[22]	ZHANG J P, WU Y, LI D Q, et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the underground renewal buds during dormancy transition and release in ‘Hangbaishao’ peony (Paeonia lactiflora) [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3): e0119118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119118
[23]	张佳平, 李丹青, 李康, 等. “芍药南移”的重新思考 [J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(4):91−95. ZHANG J P, LI D Q, LI K, et al. Reconsideration for the southward plantation of Paeonia lactiflora [J]. Chinese Landscape Architecture, 2016, 32(4): 91−95.(in Chinese)