Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!
YU Fu-song, CHE Yong-liang, JIANG Bin, WU Sheng-hui, LIN Lin, CHEN Shao-ying, LIN Tian-long. Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 22(3): 231-234.
Citation:
YU Fu-song, CHE Yong-liang, JIANG Bin, WU Sheng-hui, LIN Lin, CHEN Shao-ying, LIN Tian-long. Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 22(3): 231-234.
YU Fu-song, CHE Yong-liang, JIANG Bin, WU Sheng-hui, LIN Lin, CHEN Shao-ying, LIN Tian-long. Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 22(3): 231-234.
Citation:
YU Fu-song, CHE Yong-liang, JIANG Bin, WU Sheng-hui, LIN Lin, CHEN Shao-ying, LIN Tian-long. Comparison of RT-PCR and DFA methods for detecting classical swine fever virus[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 22(3): 231-234.
A pair of primers for RT-PCR to detect the classical swine fever virus (CSFV) were synthesized according to the published genome sequences of CSFV strains.After the RT-PCR method was established and optimized,15 clinic specimens were detected for CSFV by RT-PCR in comparison with the direct immunofluoresence assay (DFA).The result indicated that a 509 bp specifical fragment was obtained from the CSFV vaccine strains by RT-PCR with the sensitivity reaching 10 pg of CSFVRNA.Negative results were obtained from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV),porcine parvovirus (PPV),pseudorabies virus (PRV) and porcine circovirus Ⅱ (PCV2).The nucleotide sequence homology of RT-PCR products was 95%-99% of the other CSFV strains.The positive detection rate of the 15 clinic specimens reached 66.7% by RT-PCR,as compared to 60.0% by DFA.The two method’s coincidence rate was 80%.These results indicated that the RTPCR method was more sensitive than DFA,and that both methods were suitable for rapid detection of CSFV.
DownLoad: