基于地理探测器模型的福建省耕地土壤有机碳影响因素研究

陈孟耀; 刘啸歌; 黄达沧; 张黎明; 邢世和

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.06.013

基于地理探测器模型的福建省耕地土壤有机碳影响因素研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.06.013

陈孟耀^{1, 2,},
刘啸歌^{2, 3},
黄达沧^{2, 3, ,},
张黎明^{2, 3},
邢世和^{2, 3}

1.
福建农林大学计算机与信息学院，福建　福州　350002
2.
土壤生态系统健康与调控福建省高校重点实验室，福建　福州　350002
3.
福建农林大学资源与环境学院，福建　福州　350002

基金项目: 福建省自然科学基金项目（2022J05037）；福建省中青年教师教育科研项目（JAT210080）；国家自然科学基金项目（41971050）；福建农林大学科技创新项目（KFb22121XA、KFb23195A）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈孟耀（1998 —），男，硕士研究生，主要从事生态环境与资源统计研究，E-mail：1220073494@qq.com

通讯作者:
黄达沧（1989 —），男，博士，副教授，主要从事时空统计与分析研究，E-mail：huangdc@lreis.ac.cn

中图分类号: S153.6
计量
- 文章访问数: 132
- HTML全文浏览量: 57
- PDF下载量: 35
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2024-04-23
- 录用日期: 2024-07-03
- 修回日期: 2024-06-05
- 网络出版日期: 2024-07-10
- 刊出日期: 2024-06-28

Factors Affecting Soil Organic Carbon on Farmland in Fujian Analyzed by Geodetector Model

CHEN Mengyao^{1, 2
,},
LIU Xiaoge^{2, 3},
HUANG Dacang^{2, 3
, ,},
ZHANG Liming^{2, 3},
XING Shihe^{2, 3}

1.
College of Computer and Information, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian　350002, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Soil Ecosystem Health and Regulation of Fujian Universities, Fuzhou, Fujian　350002, China
3.
College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian　350002, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探明福建省耕地土壤有机碳（Soil organic carbon, SOC）的空间分布及其影响因素。方法基于福建省3万多个耕地土壤调查样点数据，利用皮尔逊相关系数、随机森林模型计算SOC影响因素的重要性，并通过地理探测器模型分析影响全省耕地土壤有机碳空间分布的因素。结果 2008年福建省耕地土壤有机碳样点数据的范围在0.12～67.28 g·kg⁻¹，呈现东南部沿海低、西部和中部高的空间格局。3种模型中地理探测器模型的分析结果最全面和客观。地理探测器模型的因子探测器结果表明气候相关因素是福建省耕地土壤有机碳含量空间分异性的主要影响因子，各影响因子按解释程度前六名分别为：年降水量（0.1685）＞年均温（0.1677）＞海拔（0.1499）＞气候类型（0.1359）＞土壤类型（0.0824）＞地貌类型（0.0731）。通过交互探测器进一步发现年降水量与年均温的交互作用对SOC空间分异的解释程度最大（0.1941），其次为年降水量与土壤类型（0.1923）、年降水量与耕地利用类型（0.1918）。结论强烈的因子交互作用表明，福建省耕地土壤有机碳含量空间分异性是由多种因子共同作用影响而非单一因子决定，对SOC进行研究需要考虑其复杂的空间分异特征。本研究可为提高耕地土壤的空间使用效率、合理布局农业生产提供科学依据。
- 土壤有机碳 /
- 地理探测器 /
- 空间分布 /
- 影响因素 /
- 交互作用
Abstract: Objective Explore the spatial distribution and influencing factors of soil organic carbon (SOC) in cultivated land in Fujian Province. Method Based on the data generated from over 30,000 survey sites on farmland in Fujian, Pearson correlation coefficient and random forest model were employed to derive key factors affecting the SOC. The geodetector model was used to analyze the spatial SOC distribution in the province. Result The data on SOC of the province in 2008 ranged between 0.12 and 67.28 g·kg⁻¹ with a spatial pattern of being low in the southeast coastal areas and high in the west and central regions. The geodetector model was shown to render the most comprehensive and objective analysis among the three models tested. It concluded the climate-related conditions to be the major factors affecting the spatial differentiation of SOC on the farmland with top 6 rankings of: annual precipitation (0.168 5)＞annual average temperature (0.167 7)＞altitude (0.144 9)＞climate type (0.135 9)＞soil type (0.082 4)＞landform type (0.073 1). The interactive detectors further revealed the interaction between the annual precipitation and annual average temperature to exert the greatest influence on the SOC spatial differentiation (0.194 1), while the annual precipitation and soil type (0.192 3) and the annual precipitation and cultivated land use type (0.1918) followed. Conclusion Multiple factors affected the SOC on the farmland in Fujian in the past. For improving the spatial utilization efficiency and bettering the agriculture production layout on the land, it seemed imperative that all various factors highlighted in this study be taken into serious considerations.
- soil organic carbon /
- geodetector /
- spatial distribution /
- influencing factors /
- interaction

HTML全文

图 1 福建省位置示意图

该图基于自然资源部标准地图服务网站下载的审图号为GS(2020)4619号标准地图制作，底图无修改。

Figure 1. Diagram of surveyed sites in Fujian Province

This map is based on the GS (2020) 4619 standard map downloaded from the Ministry of Natural Resources' standard map service website, with no modifications made to the base map.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 福建省耕地土壤有机碳空间分布

Figure 2. Spatial SOC distribution of farmland in Fujian

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 基于随机森林模型的各因素重要性雷达图

Figure 3. Radar diagram of key factors based on random forest model

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 土壤有机碳含量影响因素因子探测结果

Figure 4. Detection results on factors affecting SOC content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 土壤有机碳含量影响因素交互作用探测结果热力图

Figure 5. Heat map of interaction detection results on factors affecting SOC content

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 各连续性因素与土壤有机碳相关分析

Table 1. Correlation between continuity factors and SOC

指标 Index	土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon	年均温 Annual average temperature	年降水量 Annual precipitation	坡度 Slope	坡向 Slope orientation	海拔 Altitude	归一化植被指数 NDVI
土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon	1
年均温 Annual average temperature	−0.333^**	1
年降水量 Annual precipitation	0.380^**	−0.878^**	1
坡度 Slope	0.138^**	−0.404^**	0.387^**	1
坡向 Slope orientation	−0.044^**	0.041^**	−0.062^**	−0.133^**	1
海拔 Altitude	0.284^**	−0.868^**	0.703^**	0.477^**	0.062^**	1
归一化植被指数 NDVI	0.134^**	−0.398^**	0.391^**	0.381^**	−0.129^**	0.317^**	1
^表示在P ＜0.01级别相关性显著。 ^ indicates significant correlation at P＜0.01.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 不同影响因子下的福建省耕地土壤有机碳含量分级

Table 2. Classification of SOC on farmland in Fujian under various affecting factors

分级分类 Graded classification	年均温 Annual average temperature/ ℃	年降水量 Annual precipitation/ mm	坡度 Slope/(°)	坡向 Slope orientation/ （°）	海拔 Altitude/ m	归一化植被指数 NDVI	气候类型 Climate type	地貌类型 Landform type	耕地利用类型 Cultivated land use type	土壤类型 Soil type
1	10.00～17.16	1041～1232	0～3	−1～2	1～112	−1～−0.09	中亚热带 Middle subtropical zone	平原台地 Plain platform	灌溉水田 Irrigated paddy fields	水稻土 Paddy soil
2	17.16～17.95	1232～1338	3～5	2～6	112～244	−0.09～0.13	南亚热带 South subtropical zone	丘陵 Hill	旱地 Dry land	赤红壤 Lateritic red soil
3	17.95～18.73	1338～1438	5～8	6～18	244～376	0.13～0.35		小起伏山地 Small undulating mountains	望天田 Non-irrigated paddy field	红壤 Red earth
4	18.73～19.51	1438～1531	8～12	18～50	376～508	0.35～0.57		中起伏山地 Medium undulating mountain	水浇地 Irrigated land	风砂土 Aeolian sandy soil
5	19.51～20.29	1531～1644	12～17	50～134	508～639	0.57～1		大起伏山地 Great undulating mountains	菜地 Vegetable field	滨海盐土 Coastal saline soil
6	20.29～21.08	1644～1848	17～60	134～360	639～1348					潮土 Tidal soil
7	＞21.08									黄壤 Yellow soil
8										紫色土 Purple soil
9										石灰土 Limestone soil
根据最优参数地理探测器计算结果，年均温、海拔和NDVI采用标准差分类法，分为7类、6类和5类；年降水量采用自然间距分类法，分为6类；坡度采用分位数分类法，分为6类；坡向采用几何间隔分类法，分为6类。 According to calculation results of optimal geographic detector parameters, annual average temperature, altitude, and NDVI are classified using standard deviation classification method, which is divided into 7 categories, 6 categories, and 5 categories, respectively; annual precipitation is classified into 6 categories using natural interval classification method; slope is classified into 6 categories using quantile classification method; slope orientation adopts geometric interval classification method, which is divided into 6 categories.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 气候因素对土壤有机碳的影响

Table 3. Impact of climate factors on SOC

指标 Index	等级 Grade	样点数量 Number of sample points	土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon/（g·kg⁻¹）			标准差 Standard deviation/ （g·kg⁻¹）	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
指标 Index	等级 Grade	样点数量 Number of sample points	最小值 Minimum value	最大值 Maximum value	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation/ （g·kg⁻¹）	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
年均温 Annual average temperature/ ℃	10.00≤年均温 Annual average temperature<17.16	3337	0.17	50.69	17.74	7.35	41.43
	17.16≤年均温 Annual average temperature<17.95	2934	1.28	43.44	17.41	5.59	32.10
	17.95≤年均温 Annual average temperature<18.73	5883	1.39	43.15	17.46	5.55	31.79
	18.73≤年均温 Annual average temperature＜19.51	5857	0.12	67.28	17.07	6.16	36.09
	19.51≤年均温 Annual average temperature＜20.29	4838	0.58	43.85	16.66	6.04	36.25
	20.29≤年均温 Annual average temperature<21.08	5428	0.19	37.12	11.79	5.48	46.48
	21.08≤年均温 Annual average temperature	3082	0.20	32.89	10.57	4.99	47.21
年降水量 Annual precipitation/mm	1041≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1232	5598	0.19	35.50	10.56	4.50	42.61
	1232≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1338	3720	0.58	62.93	13.64	5.87	43.04
	1338≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1438	5165	0.12	41.76	16.61	5.77	34.74
	1438≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1531	6552	1.16	43.85	17.06	5.56	32.59
	1531≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1644	8094	0.17	67.28	17.69	6.14	34.71
	1644≤年降水量 Annual precipitation＜1848	2230	2.38	50.69	17.70	8.02	45.31
气候类型 Climate type	中亚热带 Middle subtropical zone	21274	0.17	67.28	17.27	6.14	35.56
气候类型 Climate type	南亚热带 South subtropical zone	10085	0.12	39.61	12.17	5.73	47.08

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同土壤类型、耕地利用和地貌类型下的土壤有机碳分布

Table 4. Effects of soil types, farmland use, and landform types on SOC

指标 Index	类型 Type	样点数量 Number of sample points	土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon/（g·kg⁻¹）			标准差 Standard deviation/ （g·kg⁻¹）	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
指标 Index	类型 Type	样点数量 Number of sample points	最小值 Minimum value	最大值 Maximum value	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation/ （g·kg⁻¹）	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
土壤类型 Soil type	水稻土 Paddy soil	27997	0.12	67.28	16.16	6.28	39.86
	赤红壤 Lateritic red soil	1831	0.58	30.80	9.72	4.72	48.56
	红壤 Red earth	912	1.22	43.85	15.68	6.56	41.84
	风砂土 Aeolian sandy soil	225	0.58	21.27	5.31	3.56	67.04
	滨海盐土 Coastal saline soil	175	0.99	27.20	7.91	5.10	64.48
	潮土 Tidal soil	108	1.80	30.97	11.56	5.55	48.01
	黄壤 Yellow soil	79	3.60	49.36	17.06	8.96	52.52
	紫色土 Purple soil	32	6.90	31.15	15.92	5.19	32.60
耕地利用类型 Cultivated land use type	灌溉水田 Irrigated paddy fields	23936	0.12	67.28	16.21	6.30	38.86
	旱地 Dry land	3434	0.58	50.69	11.64	6.58	56.53
	望天田 Non-irrigated paddy field	3288	0.17	42.92	16.57	5.75	34.70
	水浇地 Irrigated land	552	1.39	38.80	10.74	5.58	51.96
	菜地 Vegetable field	149	1.69	34.80	11.35	6.42	56.56
地貌类型 Landform type	平原台地 Plain platform	6942	0.19	50.11	12.36	6.44	52.10
	丘陵 Hill	8377	0.45	67.28	16.46	6.44	39.13
	小起伏山地 Small undulating mountains	14921	0.12	62.93	16.63	6.04	36.32
	中起伏山地 Medium undulating mountain	1119	1.39	38.34	16.39	5.74	35.02

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 地形因素对土壤有机碳的影响

Table 5. Impact of terrain factors on SOC

指标 Index	等级 Grade	样点数量 Number of sample points	土壤有机碳 Soil organic carbon/(g·kg⁻¹)			标准差 Standard deviation/(g·kg⁻¹)	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
指标 Index	等级 Grade	样点数量 Number of sample points	最小值 Minimum value	最大值 Maximum value	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation/(g·kg⁻¹)	变异系数 Coefficient of variation/%
坡度 Slope/(°)	0≤坡度 Slope ＜3	5243	0.41	67.28	13.60	6.52	47.94
	3≤坡度 Slope ＜5	5218	0.19	43.85	14.57	6.77	46.46
	5≤坡度 Slope ＜8	5213	0.58	49.88	15.93	6.54	41.05
	8≤坡度 Slope ＜12	5217	0.93	45.19	16.41	6.22	37.90
	12≤坡度 Slope ＜17	5241	1.39	49.36	16.69	6.06	36.31
	17≤坡度 Slope≤60	5227	0.12	62.93	16.58	6.04	36.43
坡向 Slope orientation /(°)	−1≤坡向 Slope orientation ＜2	391	1.16	50.69	14.54	6.84	47.04
	2≤坡向 Slope orientation ＜6	309	2.73	38.74	16.21	6.20	38.25
	6≤坡向 Slope orientation ＜18	956	1.10	41.18	15.31	6.18	40.37
	18≤坡向 Slope orientation ＜50	3376	0.99	50.11	16.10	6.56	40.75
	50≤坡向 Slope orientation≤134	9924	0.20	62.93	15.99	6.43	40.21
	134≤坡向 Slope orientation≤360	16403	0.12	67.28	15.35	6.47	42.15
海拔 Altitude/m	1≤海拔 Altitude＜112	9598	0.19	43.85	11.87	5.73	48.27
	112≤海拔 Altitude＜244	5080	1.16	67.28	17.41	6.29	36.13
	244≤海拔 Altitude＜376	5341	1.28	62.93	17.33	5.51	31.79
	376≤海拔 Altitude＜508	4197	0.12	43.44	16.87	5.56	32.96
	508≤海拔 Altitude＜639	2932	0.17	42.75	17.20	5.75	33.43
	639≤海拔 Altitude≤1348	4211	2.20	50.69	17.56	7.07	40.26

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	王兴, 钟泽坤, 王佳懿, 等. 黄土高原撂荒草地土壤碳库对两年增温增雨的响应 [J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60(2):523−534. WANG X, ZHONG Z K, WANG J Y, et al. Responses of soil carbon pool of abandoned grassland on the Loess Plateau to two-years warming and increased precipitation [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60(2): 523−534. (in Chinese)
[2]	李园园, 王蕾, 刘琪璟, 等. 新疆喀纳斯自然保护区森林碳储量及碳密度变化 [J]. 干旱区研究, 2019, 36(5):1136−1145. LI Y Y, WANG L, LIU Q J, et al. Changes of carbon storage and carbon density of forests in the kanas national nature reserve, Xinjiang [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2019, 36(5): 1136−1145. (in Chinese)
[3]	张维理, KOLBE H, 张认连. 土壤有机碳作用及转化机制研究进展 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(2):317−331. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.007 ZHANG W L, KOLBE H, ZHANG R L. Research progress of SOC functions and transformation mechanisms [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(2): 317−331. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.02.007
[4]	WANG S, ZHUANG Q L, JIA S H, et al. Spatial variations of soil organic carbon stocks in a coastal hilly area of China [J]. Geoderma, 2018, 314: 8−19. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.052
[5]	LI Q Q, ZHANG H, JIANG X Y, et al. Spatially distributed modeling of soil organic carbon across China with improved accuracy [J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2017, 9(2): 1167−1185. doi: 10.1002/2016MS000827
[6]	TENG M J, ZENG L X, XIAO W F, et al. Spatial variability of soil organic carbon in Three Gorges Reservoir area, China [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2017, 599/600: 1308−1316. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.05.085
[7]	MA H H, PENG M, YANG Z, et al. Spatial distribution and driving factors of soil organic carbon in the Northeast China Plain: Insights from latest monitoring data [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 911: 168602. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168602
[8]	李艾雯, 冉敏, 宋靓颖, 等. 四川盆地耕地表层土壤有机碳含量空间分布特征及其影响因素 [J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2023, 32(5):1102−1112. LI A W, RAN M, SONG L Y, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of cropland topsoil organic carbon content in the Sichuan Basin [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2023, 32(5): 1102−1112. (in Chinese)
[9]	张勇, 史学正, 赵永存, 等. 滇黔桂地区土壤有机碳储量与影响因素研究 [J]. 环境科学, 2008, 29(8):2314−2319. ZHANG Y, SHI X Z, ZHAO Y C, et al. Estimates and affecting factors of soil organic carbon storages in Yunnan-Guizhou-guangxi region of China [J]. Environmental Science, 2008, 29(8): 2314−2319. (in Chinese)
[10]	SUN T, TONG W J, CHANG N J, et al. Estimation of soil organic carbon stock and its controlling factors in cropland of Yunnan Province, China [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(5): 1475−1487. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63620-1
[11]	LUO Y L, WANG K, LI H X, et al. Application of a combinatorial approach for soil organic carbon mapping in hills [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 300: 113718. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113718
[12]	BAI Y X, ZHOU Y C. The main factors controlling spatial variability of soil organic carbon in a small Karst watershed, Guizhou Province, China [J]. Geoderma, 2020, 357: 113938. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113938
[13]	程金, 黄文卿, 张世昌, 等. 福建省表层土壤有机碳密度空间分布及影响因素分析 [J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2023, 40(4):805−816. CHENG J, HUANG W Q, ZHANG S C, et al. Spatial distribution and influencing factors of topsoil organic carbon density in Fujian Province, China [J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2023, 40(4): 805−816. (in Chinese)
[14]	ZHAO B H, LI Z B, LI P, et al. Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon and its influencing factors under the condition of ecological construction in a hilly-gully watershed of the Loess Plateau, China [J]. Geoderma, 2017, 296: 10−17. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.02.010
[15]	林景亮. 福建土壤[M]. 福州: 福建科学技术出版社, 1991.
[16]	国土资源部. 国土资源部关于印发试行《土地分类》的通知[L]. 2001-08-21.
[17]	陈中星, 张楠, 张黎明, 等. 福建省土壤有机碳储量估算的尺度效应研究 [J]. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(3):606−619. CHEN Z X, ZHANG N, ZHANG L M, et al. Scale effects of estimation of soil organic carbon storage in Fujian Province, China [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2018, 55(3): 606−619. (in Chinese)
[18]	姚彩燕, 刘绍贵, 乔婷, 等. 基于时空变异的旱地土壤有机碳高效采样策略研究 [J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3):638−648. YAO C Y, LIU S G, QIAO T, et al. Strategy for efficient sampling of upland soil based on spatiotemporal variation of the soil [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(3): 638−648. (in Chinese)
[19]	PENG S Z, DING Y X, LIU W Z, et al. 1 km monthly temperature and precipitation dataset for China from 1901 to 2017 [J]. Earth System Science Data, 2019, 11(4): 1931−1946. doi: 10.5194/essd-11-1931-2019
[20]	金林, 李研. 几种相关系数辨析及其在R语言中的实现 [J]. 统计与信息论坛, 2019, 34(4):3−11. JIN L, LI Y. Discrimination of several correlation coefficients and their implementation in R software [J]. Statistics & Information Forum, 2019, 34(4): 3−11. (in Chinese)
[21]	BREIMAN L. Random forests [J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45: 5−32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[22]	LIAW A, WIENER M. Classification and regression by randomForest [J]. R news, 2002, 2(3): 18−22.
[23]	WANG J F, LI X H, CHRISTAKOS G, et al. Geographical detectors-based health risk assessment and its application in the neural tube defects study of the Heshun region, China [J]. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 2010, 24(1): 107−127. doi: 10.1080/13658810802443457
[24]	王劲峰, 徐成东. 地理探测器: 原理与展望 [J]. 地理学报, 2017, 72(1):116−134. WANG J F, XU C D. Geodetector: Principle and prospective [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2017, 72(1): 116−134. (in Chinese)
[25]	SONG Y Z, WANG J F, GE Y, et al. An optimal parameters-based geographical detector model enhances geographic characteristics of explanatory variables for spatial heterogeneity analysis: Cases with different types of spatial data [J]. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 2020, 57(5): 593−610.
[26]	LI Q Q, YUE T X, WANG C Q, et al. Spatially distributed modeling of soil organic matter across China: An application of artificial neural network approach [J]. CATENA, 2013, 104: 210−218. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.11.012
[27]	JIANG R, WU P, SONG Y Z, et al. Factors influencing the adoption of renewable energy in the U. S. residential sector: An optimal parameters-based geographical detector approach [J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 201: 450−461. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.09.084
[28]	JENKINSON D S, ADAMS D E, WILD A. Model estimates of CO₂ emissions from soil in response to global warming [J]. Nature, 1991, 351: 304−306. doi: 10.1038/351304a0
[29]	REYNA-BOWEN L, LASOTA J, VERA-MONTENEGRO L, et al. Distribution and factors influencing organic carbon stock in mountain soils in Babia góra National Park, Poland [J]. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(15): 3070. doi: 10.3390/app9153070
[30]	DAVIDSON E A, JANSSENS I A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change [J]. Nature, 2006, 440: 165−173. doi: 10.1038/nature04514
[31]	丰思捷, 赵艳云, 李元恒, 等. 内蒙古典型草原表层土壤有机碳储量差异及影响因素 [J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(2):116−120. FENG S J, ZHAO Y Y, LI Y H, et al. The differences and influencing factors of topsoil organic carbon storage in typical steppe of inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(2): 116−120. (in Chinese)
[32]	周晓宇, 张称意, 郭广芬. 气候变化对森林土壤有机碳贮藏影响的研究进展 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(7):1867−1874. ZHOU X Y, ZHANG C Y, GUO G F. Effects of climate change on forest soil organic carbon storage: A review [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2010, 21(7): 1867−1874. (in Chinese)
[33]	ZHANG X F, ADAMOWSKI J F, LIU C F, et al. Which slope aspect and gradient provides the best afforestation-driven soil carbon sequestration on the China’s Loess Plateau? [J]. Ecological Engineering, 2020, 147: 105782. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2020.105782
[34]	丁金梅, 王维珍, 米文宝, 等. 宁夏草地土壤有机碳空间特征及其影响因素 [J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(5):1913−1922. DING J M, WANG W Z, MI W B, et al. Spatial characteristics of soil organic carbon in grassland of Ningxia and its influencing factors [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(5): 1913−1922. (in Chinese)