• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

狐尾藻对重金属锌的富集及体内分布特征

Accumulation and Subcellular Distribution of Different Forms of Zinc in Myriophyllum spicatum L.

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨锌在狐尾藻(Myriophyllum spicatum L.)体内的富集性及分布特征。
    方法 通过水培试验研究不同锌质量浓度(0、50、200 mg·L−1)对狐尾藻生物量、株高、叶片表皮细胞变化和抗氧化酶活性的影响,分析狐尾藻各器官中锌积累含量、亚细胞分布和化学形态。
    结果 狐尾藻在各质量浓度锌处理下均能存活,当锌质量浓度为50 mg·L−1(Z1)时,狐尾藻株高和生物量相较于对照组(0 mg·L−1),分别显著增加了22.87%和10.06%,根、叶中SOD活性也显著高于对照,而叶绿素和根、叶中丙二醛含量与对照无明显差异;当锌质量浓度为200 mg·L−1(Z2)时,狐尾藻的株高、生物量相比对照无显著差异,而其叶绿素含量显著低于对照处理,根、叶中丙二醛和超氧化物歧化酶活性显著高于对照,其叶片表皮细胞有部分损伤。锌处理后,狐尾藻根、茎和叶锌含量分别为55.48~242.44 mg·kg−1、14.78~31.02 mg·kg−1和18.01~69.79 mg·kg−1,Z1和Z2处理后各器官中锌含量显著高于对照处理,且根部中锌含量显著高于叶片和茎部。狐尾藻叶和茎中锌主要分布于细胞壁,占比分别占32.56%~49.50%和41.21%~43.52%;根中锌主要为可溶性组分,占比为32.10%~50.48%。狐尾藻叶和茎中锌的化学形态以氯化钠提取态、醋酸提取态、盐酸提取态为主,三者所占比例分别为77.00%~86.00%和81.00%~86.38%,根部中锌主要以水提取态、氯化钠提取态为主,二者占比59.71%~63.65%。
    结论 狐尾藻对锌具有较好的富集能力,其根部的富集能力大于茎叶。细胞壁沉积固定、液泡(可溶组分)区隔化及锌以多种低活性形态存在是狐尾藻积累与耐受锌的重要机制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective Accumulation and distribution of different forms of zinc in Myriophyllum spicatum L. were examined for applying the aquatic plant to remove the heavy metal in water.
    Method A hydroponic experimentation was conducted to determine the biomass, height, leaf epidermal cell variation, and antioxidant enzyme activities of the plants grown in water under varied zinc concentrations. Subcellular distribution and chemical forms of Zn in the roots, stems, and leaves of the plant were analyzed.
    Result M. spicatum plants survived in the water under the spiked Zn. At the Zn concentration of 50 mg·L−1(Z1), the plant height significantly increased by 22.87% and the biomass 10.06% over control with no significant differences on chlorophyll and MDA contents in the roots and leaves. On the other hand, the SOD activities in the roots and leaves of the treatment plants were significantly elevated. At 200 mg·L−1(Z2), the plant height and biomass showed no significant differences, but chlorophyll was significantly lowered by the treatments, and the MDA content and SOD activity in the roots and leaves were significantly increased by the treatments. Depending upon the treatments, the Zn contents in the roots of the aquatic plants ranged 55.48–242.44 mg·kg−1, in the stems 14.78–31.02 mg·kg−1, and in the leaves 18.01–69.79 mg·kg−1. Those under the Z1 and Z2 treatments were significantly higher than the others, and that in the roots significantly higher than that in the leaves or stems. The subcellular Zn in M. spicatum was mainly located in the leaf cell walls, which accounted for 32.56%–49.50%, and stem cell walls, which accounted for 41.21%–43.52%. In the roots, Zn was mostly in the soluble fractions that comprised 32.10%–50.48% of total. The NaCl-, HAc-, and HCl-extractable Zn were predominant at 77.00%–86.00% in the leaves and at 81.00%–86.38% in the stems. Whereas the water and NaCl-soluble Zn were mostly found in the roots at 59.71%–63.65%.
    Conclusion M. spicatum extracted Zn from the environment and stored in various forms more in the roots than the stems and leaves. The ability of the aquatic plant in accumulating Zn with tolerance might come from the cell wall retention and vacuoles segregation (soluble components), and in part, due to the low-reactivity forms of the heavy metal it absorbed.

     

/

返回文章
返回