• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

互花米草的化学防控及其对鱼类和红树林植物的安全性评价

Control Efficacy on Spartina alterniflora and Safety to Fish and Mangroves of Herbicides

  • 摘要:
    目的 筛选互花米草(Spartina alterniflora)防控药剂,评价所选药剂对鱼类和红树林植物的安全性,为互花米草的有效和可持续防控提供支持。
    方法 采用喷雾法和绝对值调查法测定8种除草剂对互花米草的田间防除效果,筛选效果最佳的除草剂及其适宜的施用浓度;采用半静态法测定所筛选药剂对大黄鱼(Larimichthys crocea)和斑马鱼(Danio rerio)的毒性;采用盆栽法测定所筛选药剂对红树林植物秋茄树(Kandelia obovata)光合和生长指标的影响。
    结果 25%咪唑烟酸水剂对互花米草的田间防除效果最好,18750~26250 mL·hm−2施用量药后45 d的株防效和鲜重防效分别可达88.43%~92.62%和87.98%~93.62%;该药剂有效成分在试验浓度范围内,药后96 h对大黄鱼和斑马鱼的LC50分别为1.32、6.78 mg·L−1,药后28 d对秋茄树叶片光合速率、株高、地上部鲜重、地下部鲜重、叶绿素含量和根系活力的抑制率可达25.38%~49.50%。其他7种除草剂对互花米草的田间防除效果均显著低于咪唑烟酸。
    结论 25%咪唑烟酸水剂是防控互花米草最佳的除草剂,田间推荐使用18750~26250 mL·hm−2;但该药剂对大黄鱼和斑马鱼属于中毒物质,对秋茄树叶片的光合能力和植株的生长具有抑制作用,在实际应用中需严格控制剂量和场所。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective  Herbicides applied to control Spartina alterniflora with minimum collateral damage to fish and mangroves were tested for aquacultural application.
    Method Field control efficacy on S. alterniflora of 8 herbicides were determined by absolute value investigation method. Effective herbicide was selected with spray concentration determined which were used subsequently in a semi-static toxicity test on large yellow croakers (Larimichthys crocea) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) as well as in a pot experiment to monitor the photosynthetic and growth of mangroves (Kandelia obovata).
    Result The 25% imazapyr aqueous solution sprayed at the rate of 18 750–26 250 mL·hm−2 was found most effective for the weeding, with the reductions of 88.43%–92.62% on weed count and 87.98%–93.62% on fresh weed weight in 45 d. The 96 h median lethal concentration LC50 of the active herbicide ingredient on L. crocea was 1.32 mg·L−1, and 6.78 mg·L−1 on D. rerio. An inhibition rate ranging from 25.38% to 49.50% on the leaf photosynthetic rate, plant height, aboveground fresh weight, belowground fresh weight, chlorophyll content, and root activity was shown on mangrove plants 28 d after herbicide spraying. The field control efficacy of the other seven herbicides against S. alterniflora was significantly lower than that of imazapyr.
    Conclusion Spraying 25% imazapyr aqueous solution at a rate of 18 750–26 250 mL·hm−2 could effectively control the spread of S. alterniflora on a farming field. The application was moderately toxic to L. crocea and D. rerio and inhibitory to the photosynthesis and growth of K. obovata. Hence, in practice, it needed to be cautiously implemented with proper supervision.

     

/

返回文章
返回